Treatment decision making in anonymous donor egg in-vitro fertilisation: A qualitative study of childless women and women with genetically related children

References

• Applegarth, L., Goldberg, N. C., Cholst, I., McGoff, N., Fantini, D., Zellers, N., (1995). Families created through ovum donation: a preliminary investigation of obstetrical outcome and psychological adjustment. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 12, 574–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie, C., Smith, J., Hewison, J., & Mason, G. (2000). Ultrasound screening for chromosomal abnormality: women's reactions to false positive results. British Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 377–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. (2000). The elusive embryo: how men and women approach new reproductive technologiesBerkley: University of California Press
   Google Scholar
• Brocki, J. M. & Wearden, A. J. (2006). A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 21, 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill, D. J. & Wardle, P. E. (2002). Management of infertility. British Medical Journal, 325, 28–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callan, V. J., Kloskf, B., Kashima, Y., & Hennessey, J. F. (1988). Toward understanding women's decisions to continue or stop in vitro fertilization: the role of social, psychological and background factors. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 5, 363–369.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J., Applegarth, L., Josephs, L., Grill, E., Baser, R. E., & Rosenwaks, Z. (2011). A cross-sectional cohort study of infertile women awaiting oocyte donation: the emotional, sexual and quality life impact. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 711.e1–716.e1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centres for Disease Control. (2008). Annual ART Report 2008: ART cycles using donor eggs. http://www.cdc.gov/art/ART2008.
   Google Scholar
• Daniluk, J. C. (1988). Infertility: intrapersonal and interpersonal impact. Fertility and Sterility, 49, 982–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniluk, J. C. (1996). When treatment fails: the transition to biological childlessness for infertile women. Women and Therapy, 19, 81–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniluk, J. C. & Hurtig-Mitchell, J. (2003). Themes of hope and healing: infertile couples' experiences of adoption. Journal of Counselling and Development, 18, 389–399.
   Google Scholar
• DeLacey, S. (2007). Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: fresh insights into patients thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos. Human Reproduction, 22, 1751–1758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, B., Hart, G., Scoular, A., & Bigrigg, A. (2001). Qualitative analysis of psychosocial impact of diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis: implications for screening. British Medical Journal, 322, 195–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Y. M. & Rosenberg, H. S. (2005). Depression in primary versus secondary infertility egg recipients. Fertility and Sterility, 83, 1882–1884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESHRE. (2001). The European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction Embryology (ESHRE), K.G. Nygren, and A. Nyboe Andersen. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1998. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction, 16, 2459–2471.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ESHRE. (2009). Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., Ferraretti, A.P., Kupka M.S., de Mouzon, J. & Nygren, K.G. Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE: Human Reproduction, 24, 1267–1287.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied progress: a cultural account of assisted conceptionLondon, UK: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. & Roberts, C. (2006). Born and made: an ethnography of pre-implantation genetic diagnosisWoodstock, Oxon, UK: Princeton University Press
   Google Scholar
• Fuscaldo, G., Russell, S., & Gillam, L. (2007). How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: patients views. Human Reproduction, 22, 3129–3138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., Murray, C., Brinsden, P., & Abdalla, H. (1999). Social versus biological parenting: family functioning and the socioemotional development of children conceived by egg or sperm donation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 519–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfeld, D. A., Greenfeld, D. G., Mazure, C. M., Keefe, D. L., & Olive, D. L. (1998). Do attitudes toward disclosure in donor oocyte recipients predict the use of anonymous versus directed donation? Fertility and Sterility, 79, 1009–1014.
   Google Scholar
• Greil, A. L. (1991). Not yet pregnant: infertile couples in contemporary AmericaNew Brunswick: Rutgers University Press
   Google Scholar
• Greil, A. L. (1997). Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 45, 1679–1704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, S. J. & Craft-Rosenberg, M. (2002). The disclosure decisions of parents who conceive children using donor eggs. Journal of Obstetric Gynaecology and Neonatal Nursing, 31, 283–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallebone, E. L. (1991). Non-genetic mothers and their ‘own’ children: infertility and IVF donor birth. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 25, 122–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammarberg, K., Astbury, J., & Baker, H. W. G. (2001). Women's experience of IVF: a follow up study. Human Reproduction, 10, 374–383.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann-Kuschinsky, E., Davis, S., Brochard, E., & Vasilenko, P. (1995). Assessment of recipient patients concerns and feelings associated with anonymous oocyte donation. Fertility and Sterility, 64, 251–253.
   Google Scholar
• Hershberger, P. E. (2004). Recipients of oocyte donation: an integrative review. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatal Nursing, 33, 610–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberger, P. E. (2006). Pregnant, donor oocyte recipient women describe their lived experience of establishing the “family lexicon”. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatal Nursing, 36, 161–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberger, P., Klock, S., & Barnes, R. (2007). Disclosure decisions about pregnant women who received donor oocytes; a phenomenological study. Fertility and Sterility, 87, 288–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HFEA. (1990). Human Fertilisation and Embryology ActLondon: H.M.S.O
   Google Scholar
• HFEA Register data. (2009). Fertility facts and figures Donor Conceptions-treatments. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/donor- conception-treatments.html
   Google Scholar
• Huys, J., Evers-Kiebooms, G., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1992). Decision making in the context of genetic risk: the use of scenarios. Birth Defects Original Article Series, 28, 17–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khamsi, F., Endman, M. W., Lacanna, I. C., & Wong, J. (1997). Some psychological aspects of oocyte donation from known donors on altruistic basis. Fertility and Sterility, 68, 323–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkland, A., Power, M., Burton, G., Baber, R., Studd, J., & Abdalla, A. (1992). Comparison of attitudes of donors and recipients to oocyte donation. Human Reproduction, 7, 355–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M. (2008). Being a ‘real’ mum: Motherhood through donated eggs and embryos. Women's Studies International Forum, 31, 241–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, M. & Rosenthal, D. (1999). Representations of reproductive technology in women's narratives of infertility. Women & Health, 29,17–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klock, S. C. & Greenfeld, D. A. (2004). Parents knowledge about the donors and their attitudes toward disclosure in oocyte donation. Human Reproduction, 19, 1575–1579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klock, S. C., Chang, G., Hiley, A., & Hill, J. (1997). Psychological distress among women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Psychosomatics, 38, 503–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, M. (2005). Nameless relations: anonymity, Melanesia and reproductive gift exchange between British ova donors and recipientsNew York: Berghahn Books
   Google Scholar
• Lalos, A., Jacobsson, L., Lalos, O., &Von Schoultz, B. (1985). The wish to have a child: a pilot study of infertile couples. Acta Psychiatry Scandinavica, 72, 476–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiblum, S. R., Kemmann, E., Colburn, D., Pasquale, S., & DeLisi, A.-M. (1987). Unsuccessful in vitro fertilization: a follow-up study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics, 4, 46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, C., Croyle, R. T., Tercyak, K. P., & Hamann, H. (2002). Genetic testing psychological aspects and implications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 784–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindheim, S. R., Kavic, S. R., & Sauer, M. V. (2000). Understanding differences in the perception of anonymous parties: a comparison between gamete donors and their recipients. Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics, 17, 127–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlstedt, P. (1985). The psychological component of infertility. Fertility and Sterility, 43, 335–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, E. C. (1995). Barren in the promised land: childless Americans and the pursuit of happinessNew York: Basic Books
   Google Scholar
• Monach, J. H. (1993). Childless: no choice. The experience of involuntary childlessnessLondon: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C. & Golombok, S. (2000). Oocyte and semen donation: a survey of UK licensed centres. Human Reproduction, 15, 2133–2139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, C. & Golombok, S. (2003). To tell or not to tell: the decision-making process of egg donation parents. Human Fertility, 6, 89–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nachtigall, R. D., Becker, G., Friese, C., Butler, A., & MacDougall, K. (2005). Parents' conceptualisation of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 431–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, C. R., Fisher, R., Feyles, V., Tekpetey, F., Hughes, L., & Isacsson, D. (2007). Changes in patient preferences in the disposal of cryopreserved embryos. Human Reproduction, 22, 3124–2138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshansky, E. F. (1987). Identity of self as infertile: an example of theory generating research. Advances in Nursing Science, 9, 54–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peddie, V. L., Van Teijlingen, E., & Bhattacharya, S. (2004). Ending in-vitro fertilization: women's perception's of decision making. Human Fertility, 7, 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Peddie, V. L., Van Teijlingen, E., & Bhattacharya, S. (2005). A qualitative study of women's decision making at the end of IVF treatment. Human Reproduction, 20, 1944–1951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettee, D. & Weckstein, L. N. (1993). A survey of parental attitudes toward oocyte donation. Human Reproduction, 8, 1963–1965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provoost, V., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., Gerris, J., Van De Velde, A., De Lissnyder, E., (2009). Infertility patients beliefs about their embryos and their disposition preferences. Human Reproduction, 24, 896–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purewal, S. & van den Akker, O. (2009). ‘I feel like they were mine and I should be looking after them’: an exploration of non-patient women's attitudes towards oocyte donation.&#146>;Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 30, 215–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raoul-Duval, A., Letur-Konirsch, H., & Frydman, R. (1992). Anonymous oocyte donation: a psychological study of recipients, donors and children. Human Reproduction, 7, 51–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reading, A. E., Chang, L. C., & Kerin, J. F. (1989). Psychological state and coping styles across an IVF treatment cycle. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 7, 95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (1991). Compelled to try: the never-enough quality of conceptive technology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 5, 29–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (1993). With child in mind: studies of the personal encounter with infertilityPhiladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press
   Google Scholar
• Schover, L. R., Thomas, A. J., Falcone, T., Attaran, M., & Goldberg, J. (1998). Attitudes about genetic risk of couples undergoing in-vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 13, 862–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade, P., Emery, J., & Lieberman, B. A. (1997). A prospective, longitudinal study of emotions and relationships in in-vitro fertilization treatment. Human Reproduction, 12, 183–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to research on psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Michie, S., Stephenson, M., & Quarrell, O. (2002). Risk perception and decision making processes in candidates for genetic testing for Huntington's disease: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 131–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to methodsIn J. A. Smith (Ed.), 2nd ed., pp London: Sage51–80
   Google Scholar
• Soderstrom-Anttila, V., Salevaara, M., & Suikkari, A. M. (2010). Increasing openness in oocyte donation families regarding disclosure over 15 years. Human Reproduction, 25, 2535–2542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderstrom-Anttila, V., Sajaniemi, N., Tiitinen, A., & Hovatta, O. (1998). Health and development of children born after oocyte donation compared with that of those born after in-vitro fertilization, and parents' attitudes regarding secrecy. Human Reproduction, 13, 2009–2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throsby, K. (2002). Negotiating ‘normality’ when IVF fails. Narrative Inquiry, 12, 43–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorova, I. G. & Kotzeva, T. (2006). Contextual shifts in Bulgarian women's identity in the face of infertility. Psychology and Health, 21, 123–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A. J. & Coyle, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction, 15, 2041–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tymstra, T. (1989). The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of “anticipated decision regret”. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 5, 207–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tymstra, T. (2007). At least we tried everything’: about binary thinking, anticipated decision regret and the imperative character of medical technology. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 28, 131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Akker, O. B. A. (2000). The importance of a genetic link in mothers commissioning a surrogate baby in the UK. Human Reproduction,15, 110–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Akker, O. (2006). A review of family donor constructs: current research and future directions. Human Reproduction Update, 12, 91–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. A., Dean, J. H., Grayson, N., & Sullivan, E. A. (2006). Assisted reproductive technology in Australia and New ZealandSydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit
   Google Scholar
• Wroe, A. L. & Salkovskis, P. M. (1999). Factors influencing anticipated decisions about genetic testing. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4, 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoeten, M. J., Tymstra, T. J., & Alberda, A. T. (1987). The waiting list for IVF. The motivations and expectations of women waiting for IVF treatment. Human Reproduction, 2, 623–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar