What is normal semen quality? On the use and abuse of reference limits for the interpretation of semen analysis results

References

• Amann, R. P. (2009a). Considerations in evaluating human spermatogenesis on the basis of total sperm per ejaculate. Journal of Andrology, 30, 626–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amann, R. P. (2009b). Evaluating spermatogenesis using semen: the biology of emission tells why reporting total sperm per sample is important, and why reporting only number of sperm per milliliter is irrational. Journal of Andrology, 30, 623–625.
   Google Scholar
• Amann, R. P. & Howards, S. S. (1980). Daily spermatozoal production and epididymal spermatozoal reserves of the human male. The Journal of Urology, 124, 211–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björndahl, L., Barratt, C. L., Fraser, L. R., Kvist, U., & Mortimer, D. (2002). ESHRE basic semen analysis courses 1995–1999: immediate beneficial effects of standardized training. Human Reproduction, 17, 1299–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björndahl, L., Mortimer, D., Barratt, C. L. R., Castilla, J. A., Menkveld, R., Kvist, U., et al(2010). A practical guide to basic laboratory andrologyCambridgeCambridge University Pressp 336.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen, E., Petersen, J. H., Andersson, A. M., & Skakkebaek, N. E. (2004). Effects of ejaculatory frequency and season on variations in semen quality. Fertility and Sterility, 82, 358–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Zhang, W., Luo, Y., Long, X., & Sun, X. (2009). Predictive value of semen parameters in in vitro fertilisation pregnancy outcome. Andrologia, 41, 111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. N., Klock, S. C., Geoghegan, A., & Travassos, D. E. (1999). Relationship between psychological stress and semen quality among in-vitro fertilization patients. Human Reproduction, 14, 753–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. G., Atkinson, A. D., & Nieschlag, E. (1999). Experience with external quality control in spermatology. Human Reproduction, 14, 765–769.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. G., Björndahl, L., Vreeburg, J., & Nieschlag, E. (2002). Semen analysis and external quality control schemes for semen analysis need global standardization. International Journal of Andrology, 25, 306–311.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper, T. G., Keck, C., Oberdieck, U., & Nieschlag, E. (1993). Effects of multiple ejaculations after extended periods of sexual abstinence on total, motile and normal sperm numbers, as well as accessory gland secretions, from healthy normal and oligozoospermic men. Human Reproduction, 8, 1251–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. G., Neuwinger, J., Bahrs, S., & Nieschlag, E. (1992). Internal quality control of semen analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 58, 172–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, T. G., Noonan, E., von Eckardstein, S., Auger, J., Baker, H. W., Behre, H. M., et al(2010). World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Human Reproduction Update, 16, 231–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonge, C., LaFromboise, M., Bosmans, E., Ombelet, W., Cox, A., & Nij, M. (2004). Influence of the abstinence period on human sperm quality. Fertility and Sterility, 82, 57–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohle, G. R. (2010). Clinical investigation of the infertile male. Clinical AndrologyIn: Björndahl, L., Giwercman, A., Tournaye, H., Weidner, W., (Eds), New YorkInforma Healthcare
   Google Scholar
• Dunphy, B. C., Kay, R., Barratt, C. L., & Cooke, I. D. (1989). Quality control during the conventional analysis of semen, an essential exercise. Journal of Andrology, 10, 378–385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elzanaty, S., Malm, J., & Giwercman, A. (2005). Duration of sexual abstinence: epididymal and accessory sex gland secretions and their relationship to sperm motility. Human Reproduction, 20, 221–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzick, D. S., Overstreet, J. W., Factor-Litvak, P., Brazil, C. K., Nakajima, S. T., Coutifaris, C., et al(2001). Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. The New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1388–1393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, C. & Jackson, M. H. (1945). Assessment of male fertility by semen analysis – an attempt to standardise methods. Lancet, 2, 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Haugen, T. B., Egeland, T., & Magnus, O. (2006). Semen parameters in Norwegian fertile men. Journal of Andrology, 27, 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Jedrzejczak, P., Taszarek-Hauke, G., Hauke, J., Pawelczyk, L., & Duleba, A. J. (2008). Prediction of spontaneous conception based on semen parameters. International journal of Andrology, 31, 499–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jequier, A. M. & Ukombe, E. B. (1983). Errors inherent in the performance of a routine semen analysis. British Journal of Urology, 55, 434–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kvist, U. & Björndahl, L. (2002). Manual on basic semen analysis. ESHRE monographsIn: Heineman, M. J., (Ed), OxfordOxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, E., Lunenfeld, E., Weiss, N., Friger, M., Har-Vardi, I., Koifman, A., & Potashnik, G. (2005). Relationship between the duration of sexual abstinence and semen quality: analysis of 9,489 semen samples. Fertility and Sterility, 83, 1680–1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkveld, R., Wong, W. Y., Lombard, C. J., Wetzels, A. M., Thomas, C. M., Merkus, H. M., & Steegers-Theunissen, R. P. (2001). Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds. Human Reproduction, 16, 1165–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortimer, D. (1994). Practical laboratory andrologyOxfordOxford University Pressp 393.
   Google Scholar
• Neill, J. D. (2005). Knobil and Neill's physiology of reproductionAmsterdamElsevier Academic Press
   Google Scholar
• Ombelet, W., Bosmans, E., Janssen, M., Cox, A., Vlasselaer, J., Gyselaers, W., Vandeput, H., et al(1997). Semen parameters in a fertile versus subfertile population: a need for change in the interpretation of semen testing. Human Reproduction, 12, 987–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabst, R. (1969). Studies on structure and function of human ductus deferens. Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte, 129, 154–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pound, N., Javed, M. H., Ruberto, C., Shaikh, M. A., & Del Valle, A. P. (2002). Duration of sexual arousal predicts semen parameters for masturbatory ejaculates. Physiology & Behavior, 76, 685–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punjabi, U. & Spiessens, C. (1998). Basic semen analysis courses: experience in Belgium. Modern ART in the 2000s – andrology in the ninetiesIn: Ombelet, W., Bosmans, E., Vandeput, H., Vereecken, A., Renier, M., Hoomans, E., (Eds), London, UKThe Parthenon Publishing Group
   Google Scholar
• Raziel, A., Friedler, S., Schachter, M., Kaufman, S., Omanski, A., Soffer, Y., & Ron-El, R. (2001). Influence of a short or long abstinence period on semen parameters in the ejaculate of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertility and Sterility, 76, 485–490.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riddell, D., Pacey, A., & Whittington, K. (2005). Lack of compliance by UK andrology laboratories with World Health Organization recommendations for sperm morphology assessment. Human Reproduction, 20, 3441–3445.
   Google Scholar
• Skakkebaek, N. E. (2010). Normal reference ranges for semen quality and their relations to fecundity. Asian Journal of Andrology, 12, 95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Solberg, H. E. (1999). Chapter 14. Establishment and use of reference values. Tietz textboook of clinical chemistryIn: Burtis, C. A., (Ed), PhiladelphiaWB Saunders Company
   Google Scholar
• Sripada, S., Townend, J., Campbell, D., Murdoch, L., Mathers, E., & Bhattacharya, S. (2010). Relationship between semen parameters and spontaneous pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility, 94, 624–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Steeg, J. W., Steures, P., Eijkemans, M. J, Habbema, J. D., Hompes, P. G., Kremer, J. A., et al(2010). Role of semen analysis in subfertile couples. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 1013–1019.
   Google Scholar
• Vreeburg, J. T. M. & Weber, R. F. A. (1998). Basic semen analysis courses: experience in the Netherlands. Modern ART in the 2000s – andrology in the ninetiesIn: Ombelet, W., Bosmans, E., Vandeput, H., Vereecken, A., Renier, M., Hoomans, E., (Eds), London, UKThe Parthenon Publishing Group
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1987). WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interactions. 2nd edCambridge, UKCambridge University Pressp 67.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1992). WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions. 3rd edCambridge, UKCambridge University Pressp 107.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1999). WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interactions. 4th edCambridge, UKCambridge University Pressp 128.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2010). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th edGenevaWorld Health Organization p 286.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, Y., Sofikitis, N., Mio, Y., & Miyagawa, I. (2000). Influence of sexual stimulation on sperm parameters in semen samples collected via masturbation from normozoospermic men or cryptozoospermic men participating in an assisted reproduction programme. Andrologia, 32, 131–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar