References
- Astuti, R. (2009). ‘Revealing and Obscuring Rivers’ Pedigrees’, in Sarah Bamford and James Leach (eds) Kinship and Beyond: The Genealogical Model Reconsidered, New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books
- Atkinson, R. & Flint, J. (2001). Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies. Social Research Update, Issue 33, Guildford, UK: University of Surrey.
- Barton, M., Walker, K., & Wiesner, B. P. (1945). Artificial Insemination. British medical journal, 1, 40–43.
- British Infertility Counselling Association. (2003). Opening the Record: Planning the provision of counselling to people applying for information from the HFEA Register, BICA Publications: Available at www.bica.net/openingtherecord
- British Medical Journal. (1973). Report of Panel on Human Artificial Insemination Supplement, 7th April, pp 3-5, Annual Report of Council Appendices: Appendix V.
- Brudenell, M., McLaren, A., Short, R., & Symonds, M. (eds) (1976). Artificial Insemination: Proceedings of the Fourth Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
- Carsten, J. (1997). The Heat of the Hearth: The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Carsten, J. (2000). Knowing where you’ve come from: ruptures and continuities of time and kinship in narratives of adoption reunion. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institution, (N.S.), 6, 687–703.
- Ciba Foundation. (1973). Law and Ethics of A.I.D. and Embryo Transfer, Ciba Foundation Symposium 17 (new series), Amsterdam and New York: Associated Scientific Publishers.
- Cusine, D. (1988). New Reproductive Techniques: a legal perspective, Aldershot: Gower Publishing Company Limited.
- Daniels, K. (1989).Semen donors: their motivations and attitudes to their offspring. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 7, 121–127.
- Daniels, K., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & Curson, R. (2005). Short communication: previous semen donors and their views regarding the sharing of information with offspring. Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 20, 1670–1675.
- Department of Health. (2003). Donor information: providing information about gamete or embryo donors: Responses to consultation. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_4071838.
- Edwards, J. (2009) ‘Introduction: The Matter in Kinship’ in Jeanette: Edwards and Carles Salazar (eds), European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology, New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
- Edwards, J. (2000). Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Edwards, J. & Strathern, M. (2000). ‘Including our own’, in Cultures of Relatedness: New approaches to the study of relatedness, ed. Janet, Carsten, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Family Law Reform Act 1987, London: HMSO. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1987/42/contents
- Feversham Report. (1960). Report of the Departmental Committee on Human Artificial Insemination, Cmnd 1105, London: HMSO
- Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied Progress: a cultural account of assisted conception, London and New York: Routledge.
- HMSO. (1990). Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Chapter 37. The Stationary Office, London, SW8 5DT. Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/1990?title=Human%20Fertilisation%20and%20Embryology%20Act
- HMSO. (2008). Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. Chapter 22. The Stationary Office, London, SW8 5DT. Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/2008?title=Human%20Fertilisation%20and%20Embryology%20Act
- Marcus, G. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117.
- Rapp, R. (1999). Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: the Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America, New York and London: Routledge.
- Sheldon, S. (2005). Fragmenting Fatherhood: the Regulation of Reproductive Technologies. Modern Law Review, 68, 523–553.
- Snowden, R. & Mitchell, G. (1983). The Artificial Family: a consideration of artificial insemination by donor, London: Unwin Paperbacks.
- Speirs, J.M. (2007a). ‘Secretly connected? Anonymous semen donation, genetics and meanings of kinship’. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Edinburgh. Available at: http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/1842/2649/4/JM%20Speirs%20PhD%20thesis%202008.pdf
- Speirs, J.M. (2007b). ‘Personal semen donors: report of a survey of UK clinics’ provision of donor-assisted conception treatment to patients using own known donors’. Available at: http://aquarius.futurewebspace.co.uk/ngdt.co.uk/downloads/Use%20of%20known%20sperm%20donors.pdf
- Strathern, M. (1999). ‘Refusing information’, chapter 4 in Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things, New Brunswick, New Jersey: The Athlone Press.