Griefwork online: Perinatal loss, lifecourse disruption and online support

References

• Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR). (2002). Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the Aoir Ethics Working committee. http://aoir.org/documents/ethics-guide/ Accessed 24 October 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In: Richardson, J. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press: 241–258.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, L.J., Aoun, S.M., O’Connor, M., & Rumbold, B. (2014). Bringing the gap in palliative bereavement support: an international perspective. Death Studies, 38, 54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness, 4, 167–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bury, M. (1991). The sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects. Sociology of Health and Illness, 13, 451468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury, M. (2001). Illness narratives: Fact or fiction? Sociology of Health and Illness, 23, 263285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callister, L.C. (2006). Perinatal loss: a family perspective. Journal of Perinatal Neonatal Nursing, 20, 227–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, A. (2007). Sociology in the Age of the Internet. Buckingham: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. (2006). New Social Ties: Contemporary Connections in a Fragmented Society. Houndsmills: Macmillan Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (2003). Woe the Women: DES, mothers and daughters. In: Earle, S. & Letherby G. (eds.), Gender, Identity and Reproduction: Social Perspectives. Houndsmills: Palgrave: 160–173.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (2008). A technology of care: caregiver response to perinatal loss. Women's Studies International Forum, 31, 278–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyegrov, K. (2003). Micro-Sociological analysis of social support following traumatic bereavement: unhelpful and avoidant responses from the community. Omega, 48, 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, S. & Letherby, G. (eds.) (2003). Gender, Identity and Reproduction: social perspectives. Houndsmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, S., Komaromy, C., & Layne, L. (eds.) (2012). Understanding Reproductive Loss: Perspectives on Life, Death and Fertility. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Exley, C. & Letherby, G. (2001). Managing a disrupted lifecourse: issues of identity and emotion work. Health, 5, 112–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, K. (2000). “The Management of Hunger”: using fiction in writing anthropology. Qualitative Inquiry, 6, 474–488.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, J., Bradley, H., Levitas, R., Smith, L., & Garcia, J. (2007). The loss of possibility: scientisation of death and the special case of early miscarriage. Sociology of Health&Illness, 29, 1003–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., & Barab, S. (2002). Searching for safety online: managing “Trolling” in a feminist forum. The Information Society: An International Journal, 18, 371–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A.R. (1983[2003]). The Managed Heart: Commercialisation of Human Feelings. California: California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inckle, K. (2010). Telling tales? Using ethnographic fictions to speak embodied ‘truth’. Qualitative Research, 10, 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R.V. (2009). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Letherby, G. (1993). The meanings of miscarriage. Women's Studies International Forum, 16, 165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1998). Sociological imaginations and imagining sociologies: bodies, auto/biographies and other mysteries. Sociology, 32, 647–663.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. (2012). Bereaved Parents: a contradiction in terms? In: Earle, S., Komaromy, C., & Layne, L. (eds.), Understanding Reproductive Loss: Perspectives on Life, Death and Fertility, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Reif, L.V., Patton, M.J., & Gold, P.B. (1995). Bereavement, stress and social support in members of a self-help group. Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 292–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonds, W. & Rothman, B.K. (1992). Centuries of Solace: Expressions of Maternal Grief in Popular literature. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, C.S. (2006). Grief support groups used by few: are bereavement needs being met? Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life and Palliative Care, 2, 29–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stroebe, M., Stroebe, W., & Schut, H. (2001). Gender differences in adjustment to bereavement: an empirical and theoretical review. Review of General Psychology, 5, 62–83.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, V.R., Lavitt, M., & Kelley, D. (2000). The nature and prevention of harm in technology-mediated self-help settings: three exemplars. In: Finn J. & Holden G. (eds.), Human Services Online: A New Arena for Service Delivery. New York: The Howarth Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, T. (2011). Angels not souls: popular religion in the online mourning for British celebrity Jade Goody. Religion, 41, 
29–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, T. (2013). Contemporary Community Grieving. Talk to Cruse-Bereavement Care Annual Conference (July). http://www.cruse.org.uk/./Contemporary%20Community%20Grieving.pdf Accessed 24 October 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. (1984). The genesis of chronic illness, narrative re-construction. Sociology of Health and Illness, 6, 175–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S.J. (2000). Chronic illness as biographical disruption or biographical disruption as chronic illness?: reflections on a core concept. Sociology of Health and Illness, 22, 40–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K.R., Wallin, J.S., & Reiser, C. (2003). Social stratification and the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review, 21, 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar