Assisted reproduction for postmenopausal women

References

• Allan, S. (2012). Donor conception, secrecy and the search for information. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19, 631–650.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banh, D., Havemann, D., & Phelps, J. (2010). Reproduction beyond menopause: how old is too old for assisted reproductive technology? Journal of Assisted Reproductive Genetics, 27, 365–370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballantyne, A. & de Lacey, S. (2008). Wanted—egg donors for research: a research ethics approach to donor recruitment and compensation. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 1, 145–164.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T.L. & Childress, J.F. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. (1976). The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Venture Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (2009). ‘It's way out of my league.’ Low-income women's experiences of medicalised infertility. Gender and Society, 23, 688–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. (2010). Beyond (financial) accessibility: inequalities within the medicalisation of infertility. Sociology of Health and Illness, 32, 631–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E. & Farrand, A. (2005). Reproductive tourism – a price worth paying for reproductive autonomy. Critical Social Policy, 25, 91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budev, M., Arroliga, A.C., & Falcone, T. (2005). Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Critical Care Medicine, 33, S301–S306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bytheway, B. (2005). Ageism and age categorization. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, J. & Roberts, D. (1996). A feminist social justice approach to reproduction assisting technologies. Kentucky Law Journal, 84, 1198.
   Google Scholar
• Cluroe, A. & Synek, B. (1995). A fatal case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with cerebral infarction. Pathology, 27, 344–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corea, G. (1985). The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Culley, L. & Hudson, N. (2009). Constructed Relatedness. Ethnicity, gender and third party assisted conception in the UK. Current Sociology, 57, 249–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, W. (1973). The Tuskegee syphilis study. New England Journal of Medicine, 289, 730–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutas, D. (2007). Postmenopausal motherhood: immoral, illegal? A case study. Bioethics, 21, 458.
   Google Scholar
• Donchin, A. (1996). Feminist critiques of new fertility technologies: implications for social policy. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 21, 475–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, C. (2006). Genetics, fathers and families: exploring the implications of changing the law in favour of identifying sperm donors. Social and Legal Studies, 15, 494–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucette-Dudman, D. & LaCure, J. R. (1996). Raising Our Children's Children. Minneapolis, MN: Fairview.
   Google Scholar
• Downie, J., Hay, D., Horner, B., Wichmann, H., & Hislop, A. (2009). Children living with their grandparents: resilience and well-being. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, S. & Letherby, G. (2007). Conceiving time? Women who do or do not conceive. Sociology of Health and Illness, 29, 233–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, T. & Golombok, S. (2012). Donor insemination: a follow-up study of disclosure decisions, family relationships and child adjustment at adolescence. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 25, 193–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1994). ‘Living in a Post-traditional Society’. In: Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, C. (eds), Reflexive Modernization, Cambridge: Polity Press, 56–109.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, R. (2003). Childfree and feminine: understanding the gender identity of voluntarily childless women. Gender and Society, 17, 122–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., Readings, J., Blake, L., Casey, P., Mellish, L., Marks, A., & Jadva, V. (2011). Children conceived by gamete donation: Psychological adjustment and mother-child relationships at age 7. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 230–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok, S., Blake, L., Casey, P., Roma, G., & Jadva, V. (2013). Children born through reproductive donation: a longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 653–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, C. & Silverstein, M. (2002). Grandmothers raising grandchildren: family structure and well-being in culturally diverse families. The Gerontologist, 42, 676–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goold, I. & Savulescu, J. (2009). In favour of freezing eggs for non-medical reasons. Bioethics, 23, 47–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, V. & Daniels, K.R. (2007). The (ir)relevance of genetics: engendering parallel worlds of procreation and reproduction. Sociology of Health and Illness, 29, 692–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greil, A. & McQuillan, J. (2010). Trying times: medicalisation, intent and ambiguity in the definition of infertility. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 24, 137–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, J.A. (2006). Towards transnational feminisms: some reflections and concerns in relation to the globalisation of reproductive technologies. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13, 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimes, E., Taylor, K., & Turkmendag, I. (2012). Eggs, ethics and exploitation? Investigating women's experiences of an egg sharing scheme. Sociology of Health and Illness, 34, 1199–1214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. (2006). Tampering with nature: ‘nature’ and the ‘natural’ in media coverage of genetics and biotechnology. Media, Culture and Society, 28, 811–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, K. (2006). Constructing families and kinship through donor insemination. Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 261–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, K. & Daniels, K. (2007). Parents dilemmas in sharing donor insemination conceptions stories with their children. Children and Society, 21, 420–431.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, K. (2009). Egg freezing: a breakthrough for reproductive autonomy? Bioethics, 23, 39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, M., Salter-Ling, N., & Glover, L. (2000). Donor insemination: telling children about their origins. Child Psychology and Psychiatry Review, 5, 157–163.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. & van Balen, F. (eds). (2002). Infertility Around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender and Reproductive Technologies: A View from the Social Sciences. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. & Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. (2008). Assisted reproductive technologies and cultural change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 177–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2009). The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Human Reproduction, 24, 1909–1919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, K. (2005). From Post-industrial to Post-modern Society: New Theories of the Contemporary World. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lafontaine, C. (2009). Regenerative medicine's immortal body: from the fight against ageing to the extension of longevity. Body and Society, 15, 53–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laslett, P. (1987). The emergence of the third age. Ageing and Society, 7, 133–160.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, N. (2008). Alternative kinship, marriage and reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 375–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, M. (2004). Assisted reproduction: managing an unruly technology. Health Care Analysis, 12, 41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDougall, K., Becker, G., Scheib, J., & Nachtigall, R. (2007). Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes. Fertility and Sterility, 87, 524–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. (2010). Medical travel and the sale of human biological materials: suggestions for ethical policy development. Global Social Policy, 10, 377–395.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L.J. (2010). Anticipating infertility. Egg freezing, genetic preservation and risk. Gender and Society, 24, 526–545.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, C. (2007). For dignity or money: feminists on the commodification of women's reproductive labour. Chapter 11. In: Steinbock, B. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 258–281.
   Google Scholar
• McMahan, J. (2007). Killing Embryos for stem cell research. Metaphilosophy, 38, 170–189.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinnie, A. (2001). Gamete donation and anonymity. Should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents? Human Reproduction, 16, 807–817.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minkler, M. & Roe, K. (1993). Grandmother as Caregivers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, C. (1994). Unwomanly Conduct: The Challenges of Intentional Childlessness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, T. (2004). Case Studies in Biomedical Research Ethics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C. & Golombok, S. (2003). ‘To tell or not to tell: the decision making process of egg-donation parents.’Human Fertility, 6, 89–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nash, C. (2004). Genetic Kinship. Cultural Studies, 18, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtigall, R., Becker, G., Friese, C., & Butler, A. (2005). Parents’ conceptualisations of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertility and Sterility, 84, 431–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, C., McDermid, A. Tekpetey, F., & Tummon, I. (2003). Embryo donation: attitudes towards donation procedures and factors predicting willingness to donate. Human Reproduction, 14, 878–884.
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, N., Boldt, J., & Nagy, Z. (2010). Oocyte cryopreservations: is it time to remove its experimental label? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 27, 69–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noyes, N., Porcu, E., & Borini, A. (2009). Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 18, 769–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, J. (1999). On the use of IVF by post-menopausal women. Hypatia. 14, 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Pennings, G. (2001). Postmenopausal women and the right of access to oocyte donation. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18, 171–181.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen T.S (2004). A Woman's choice? On women, assisted reproduction and social coercion. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 7, 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Plas, E., Berger, P., Hermann, M., & Pfluger, H. (2000). Effects of aging on male fertility? Experimental Gerontology, 35, 543–551.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Readings, J., Black, L., Casey, P, Vasanti, J., & Golombok, S. (2011). Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.01.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remennick, L. (2000). Childless in the land of imperative motherhood: stigma and coping among infertile Israeli women. Sex Roles, 43, 821–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. (2001). Regulating the market for human eggs. Bioethics, 15, 1–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnik, D. (1998). The Ethics of HIV Research in Developing Nations. Bioethics, 12, 286–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, B.K. (2000). Recreating Motherhood. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, N.F. (1976). The motherhood mandate. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selgelid, M. (2003). Ethics and eugenic enhancement. Poiesis Prax, 1, 239–261.
   Google Scholar
• Semba, S., Moriya, T., Youssef, E., & Sasano, H. (2000). An autopsy case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with massive pulmonary edema and pleural effusion. Pathology International, 50, 549–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, L. (1997). Remaking Eden: Cloning and Beyond in a Brave New World. New York: Avon books.
   Google Scholar
• Sneed, J. & Whitbourne, S. (2005). Models of the aging self. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 375–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel, A. & Sutcliffe, A. (2009). Long-term health implications for children conceived by IVF/ICSI. Human Fertility, 12, 21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szewczuk, E. (2012). Age-related infertility: a tale of two technologies. Sociology of Health and Illness, 34, 429–443.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson C. (2002). Fertile ground: feminists theorize infertility. In: Inhorn, M & Van Balen, E. (Eds.), Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 52–78.
   Google Scholar
• Turkmendag, I. (2012). The donor-conceived child's right to personal identity’: the public debate on donor anonymity in the United Kingdom. Journal of Law and Society, 39, 58–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A. & Cole, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction, 15, 2041–2051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnithan, M. (2010). Infertility and assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) in a globalised India: ethics, medicalisation and agency. Asian Bioethics Review, 2, 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, A. (2010). Challenges of medical travel to global regulation: a case study of reproductive travel in Asia. Global Social Policy, 10, 396–415.
   Google Scholar
• Widdows, H. (2009). Persons and their parts: New reproductive technologies and risks of commodification. Health Care Analysis, 17, 36–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar