Ultrasound prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformations: Hospital-based screening and necropsy study

References

• Carrera JM. Diagno´ stico Prenatal. Barcelona; 1987. pp 107– 129.
   Google Scholar
• European Study Group of Prenatal Diagnosis: Recommenda- tions and Protocols for Prenatal Diagnosis. Barcelona, EAPM; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo M y, Carrera JM. Diagno´ stico de los defectos conge´nitos. In: Fabre E, editor. Manual de Asistencia a la Patolog´ıa Obste´trica. Zaragoza: Grupo de Trabajo de la SEGO; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Levi S. Screening for congenital malformations by ultrasound. In: Kurjak E, editor. Textbook of Perinatal Medicine. London: The Parthenon Publishing Group; 1998. pp 587–609.
   Google Scholar
• Levi S. Mass screening for fetal malformations: the European Study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:555–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto V, Wankelmuth M, D’Addario V. General Aspects on Ultrasound Screening of Congenital Anomalies. pp 365–371. In: Kurjak A, Chervenak FA, editors. Textbook of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New Delhi: Jaypee; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Galindo A. Ventajas e inconvenientes del Diagno´ stico Prenatal. In: Avances en Ecograf´ıa Obste´trica. Madrid: Homenaje al Prof. Pedro de la Fuente; 2005. pp 45–70.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera JM. Deca´logo de una buena praxis me´dica en diagno´ stico prenatal. Prog Diagn Pren 1999;6:271.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera JM, Cusi V, Carrera M. Fetal Necropsy. In: Carrera JM, Chervenak F, Kurjak A, editors. Controversies in Perinatal Medicine. London: The Parthenon Publishing Group; 2003. pp 107–129.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin VJ, Kalousek DK, Dimmick JE, Applegarth DA, Hardwick DF. Diagnostic pathologic investigation of the malformed conceptus. Persp Pediat Pathol 1982;7:65–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalousek DK, Fitch N, Paradice BA. Pathology of the human embryo and previable fetus. NewYork: Springer; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Kalousek DK, Neave C. Pathology of abortion, the embryo and the previable fetus. In: Wigglesworth IS, Singer DB, editors. Textbook of fetal and perinatal pathology. Boston: Blackwell, 1991. pp 123–160.
   Google Scholar
• Keeling JW. Postmortem examination of the fetus. In: Rodeck CH, Nicolaides KH, editors. Prenatal diagnosis. Proceedings of the Eleventh Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Winter RM, Knowles SAS, Bigber FR, Baraister M. The nalformed fetus and stillbirth. A diagnostic approach. Chichester: John Wiley; 1988. pp 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ballesta F. Sistema´tica diagno´ stica de las malformaciones en el recie´n nacido. In: Carrera JM, editor. Diagno´ stico prenatal. Barcelona: Salvat Medicina; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• De Grouchyy J, Turleau C. Clinical atlas of human chromosomes, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman RM, Gorlin R. Malformaciones en el lactante y en el nun˜ o. Barcelona: Salvat; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Graham JM. Smith’s recognizable patterns of human defor- mation, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Jaso E, Gracia R, Jaso E. Sindromes pedia´tricos dismorfoge´n- icos. Madrid: Normal; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Schinzel A. Catalogue of unbalanced chromosmes aberrations in man. New York: Walter de Gruyter; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DW. Recognizable patterns of human malformation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DW. Recognizable patterns of human deformation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Haxton MJ, Bell J. Fetal anatomic abnormalities and other associated factors in middle-trimester abortion and thier relevance to patient counselling. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90:501–506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milunsky A. Genetics law and obstetrics practice. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983;90:497–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keeling JW. Fetal hydrops. In: Keeling JW, editor. Fetal and neonatal pathology. 2nd ed. London: Springer; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence KM, Martin D. A technique for obtaining undistorted specimens of the central nervous system. J Clin Pathol 1959;12:188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrera JM, Alegre M, Torrents M. La ultrasonograf´ıa en el diagno´ stico prenatal. In: Carrera JM, editor. Diagno´ stico prenatal. Barcelona: Salvat Medicina; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Report of the European Study Group on Prenatal Diagnosis. Recommendations and protocols on prenatal diagnosis. Barcelona: Garsi; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Rutledge JC et al. Anatomic correlates of the ultrasonographic prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1986;6:51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton-Smith J, Farndon PA, Mc Keown C, Donnai D. Examination of fetuses after induced abortion for fetal abnormality. Br Med J 1990;300:295–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrera JM, Cusi V, Torrents M, Mun˜ oz A. Necropsia embrionaria y fetal temprana. In: Carrera JM, Kurjak A, editors. Medicina del embrio´ n. Barcelona: Masson. pp 587–602.
   Google Scholar
• Keeling JW, Manning N, Chamberlain P. Accuracy of fetal anomaly scanning (Abstract). Pediatr Pathol 1990;10: 653.
   Google Scholar
• Manchester DK, Pretorius DH, Aavery C et al.. Accuracy of ultrasound diagnoses in pregnancies complicated by suspected fetal anomalies. Prenat Diagn 1988;8:109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Laurini RN. Presente y futuro de la patolog´ıa del desarollo. Patolog´ıa 1986;19:8–15.
   Google Scholar