Docking, CoMFA and CoMSIA studies of a series of sulfonamides derivatives as carbonic anhydrase I inhibitors

References

• Keilin D, Mann T. Carbonic anhydrase. Purification and nature of the enzyme. Biochem J 1940;34:1163–1176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nuti E, Orlandini E, Nencetti S, Rossello A, Innocenti A, Scozzafava A et al. Carbonic anhydrase and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors. Inhibition of human tumor-associated isozymes IX and cytosolic isozyme I and II with sulfonylated hydroxamates. Bioorg Med Chem 2007;15:2298–2311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare BW, Supuran CT. A physically interpretable quantum-theoretic QSAR for some carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with diverse aromatic rings, obtained by a new QSAR procedure. Bioorg Med Chem 2005;13:2197–2211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavernet L, Gonzalez Funes JL, Blanch LB, Estiu G, Maresca A, Supuran CT. Affinity of sulfamates and sulfamides to carbonic anhydrase II isoform: experimental and molecular modeling approaches. J Chem Inf Model 2010;50:1113–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarko L, Supuran CT. QSAR studies for the inhibition of the transmembrane isozymes XII and XIV of human carbonic anhydrase with a series of sulfonamides. Bioorg Med Chem 2007;15:5666–5671.
   Google Scholar
• Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrases: novel therapeutic applications for inhibitors and activators. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2008;7:168–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supuran CT, Winum JY (ed.: Wang B). Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2009, p. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida T, Munei Y, Hitaoka S, Chuman H. Correlation analyses on binding affinity of substituted benzenesulfonamides with carbonic anhydrase using ab initio MO calculations on their complex structures. J Chem Inf Model 2010;50:850–860.
   Google Scholar
• Pastorekova S, Parkkila S, Zavada J. Tumor-associated carbonic anhydrases and their clinical significance. Adv Clin Chem 2006;42:167–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Tsai KC, Du L, Fang H, Li M, Xu W. How to generate reliable and predictive CoMFA models. Curr Med Chem 2011;18:923–930.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Hamid MK, Abdel-Hafez AA, El-Koussi NA, Mahfouz NM, Innocenti A, Supuran CT. Design, synthesis, and docking studies of new 1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-thione derivatives with carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity. Bioorg Med Chem 2007;15:6975–6984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal VK, Banerji M, Gupta M, Singh J, Khadikar PV, Supuran CT. QSAR study on carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: water-soluble sulfonamides incorporating beta-alanyl moieties, possessing long lasting-intra ocular pressure lowering properties–a molecular connectivity approach. Eur J Med Chem 2005;40:1002–1012.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal VK, Bano S, Supuran CT, Khadikar PV. QSAR study on carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: aromatic/heterocyclic sulfonamides containing 8-quinoline-sulfonyl moieties, with topical activity as antiglaucoma agents. Eur J Med Chem 2004;39:593–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melagraki G, Afantitis A, Sarimveis H, Igglessi-Markopoulou O, Supuran CT. QSAR study on para-substituted aromatic sulfonamides as carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors using topological information indices. Bioorg Med Chem 2006;14:1108–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicker N, Ho Y, Robinson J, Woo LL, Purohit A, Reed MJ et al. Docking studies of sulphamate inhibitors of estrone sulphatase in human carbonic anhydrase II. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2003;13:863–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare BW, Supuran CT. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Part 86. A QSAR study on some sulfonamide drugs which lower intra-ocular pressure, using the ACE non-linear statistical method. Eur J Med Chem 2000;35:859–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supuran CT, Clare BW. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors − Part 57: Quantum chemical QSAR of a group of 1,3,4-thiadiazole- and 1,3,4-thiadiazoline disulfonamides with carbonic anhydrase inhibitory properties. Eur J Med Chem 1999;34:41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güzel O, Maresca A, Hall RA, Scozzafava A, Mastrolorenzo A, Mühlschlegel FA et al. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. The beta-carbonic anhydrases from the fungal pathogens Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans are strongly inhibited by substituted-phenyl-1H-indole-5-sulfonamides. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2010;20:2508–2511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer RD, Patterson DE, Bunce JD. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J Am Chem Soc 1988;110:5959–5967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klebe G, Abraham U, Mietzner T. Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity. J Med Chem 1994;37:4130–4146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirhadi S, Ghasemi JB. 3D-QSAR analysis of human immunodeficiency virus entry-1 inhibitors by CoMFA and CoMSIA. Eur J Med Chem 2010;45:4897–4903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momany FA, Rone R. Validation of the general purpose QUANTA ®3.2/CHARMm® force field. J Comput Chem 1992;13:888–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Discovery Studio, Accelrys Software, Inc, San Diego, CA, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Politi A, Durdagi S, Moutevelis-Minakakis P, Kokotos G, Mavromoustakos T. Development of accurate binding affinity predictions of novel renin inhibitors through molecular docking studies. J Mol Graph Model 2010;29:425–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GOLD: User Guides and Tutorials http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/support/documentation/gold/3_1/gold31.pdf (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Tripos, QSARTM Manual, SYBYL, version 7.3, 2006, St. Louis 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Baroni M, Costantino G, Cruciani G, Riganelli D, Valigi R, Clementi S. Generating Optimal Linear PLS Estimations (GOLPE): An advanced chemometric tool for handling 3D-QSAR problems. Quant Struct Act Relat 1993;12:9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cho SJ, Tropsha A. Cross-validated R2-guided region selection for comparative molecular field analysis: a simple method to achieve consistent results. J Med Chem 1995;38:1060–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Gao Y, Liu L, Lai L. All-orientation search and all-placement search in comparative molecular field analysis. J Mol Model 1998;4:276–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark R, Fox P. Statistical variation in progressive scrambling. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2004;18:563–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar