More effective dithiocarbamate derivatives inhibiting carbonic anhydrases, generated by QSAR and computational design

References

• Carta F, Aggarwal M, Maresca A, Scozzafava A, McKenna R, Masini E et al. Dithiocarbamates strongly inhibit carbonic anhydrases and show antiglaucoma action in vivo. J Med Chem 2012;55:1721–1730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carta F, Aggarwal M, Maresca A, Scozzafava A, McKenna R, Supuran CT. Dithiocarbamates: A new class of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Crystallographic and kinetic investigations. Chem Commun (Camb) 2012;48:1868–1870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XJ, Xu HW, Guo LL, Zheng JX, Xu B, Guo X et al. Synthesis and in vitro antitumor activity of new butenolide-containing dithiocarbamates. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2011;21:3074–3077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti SM, Maresca A, Viparelli F, Carta F, De Simone G, Mühlschlegel FA et al. Dithiocarbamates are strong inhibitors of the β-class fungal carbonic anhydrases from Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2012;22:859–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maresca A, Carta F, Vullo D, Supuran CT. Dithiocarbamates strongly inhibit the ß-class carbonic anhydrases from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2011. DOI: 10.3109/14756366.2011.641015
   Google Scholar
• Segovia N, Crovetto G, Lardelli P, Espigares M. In vitro toxicity of several dithiocarbamates and structure-activity relationships. J Appl Toxicol 2002;22:353–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Boxtel AL, Pieterse B, Cenijn P, Kamstra JH, Brouwer A, van Wieringen W et al. Dithiocarbamates induce craniofacial abnormalities and downregulate sox9a during zebrafish development. Toxicol Sci 2010;117:209–217.
   Google Scholar
• Tilton F, La Du JK, Vue M, Alzarban N, Tanguay RL. Dithiocarbamates have a common toxic effect on zebrafish body axis formation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2006;216:55–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Boxtel AL, Kamstra JH, Fluitsma DM, Legler J. Dithiocarbamates are teratogenic to developing zebrafish through inhibition of lysyl oxidase activity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2010;244:156–161.
   Google Scholar
• Akamatsu M. Current state and perspectives of 3D-QSAR. Curr Top Med Chem 2002;2:1381–1394.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oprea TI, Taboureau O, Bologa CG. Of possible cheminformatics futures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2012;26:107–112.
   Google Scholar
• de Paula da Silva CH, Sanches SM, Taft CA. A molecular modeling and QSAR study of suppressors of the growth of Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes. J Mol Graph Model 2004;23:89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Ma GY, Yang Y, Cheng K, Zheng QZ, Mao WJ et al. Synthesis, molecular modeling and biological evaluation of dithiocarbamates as novel antitubulin agents. Bioorg Med Chem 2010;18:4310–4316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark DE. Prediction of intestinal absorption and blood-brain barrier penetration by computational methods. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2001;4:477–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miri R, Firuzi O, Peymani P, Zamani M, Mehdipour AR, Heydari Z et al. Synthesis, cytotoxicity, and QSAR study of new aza-cyclopenta[b]fluorene-1,9-dione derivatives. Chem Biol Drug Des 2012;79:68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisek K, Kuret J. QSAR studies for prediction of cross-ß sheet aggregate binding affinity and selectivity. Bioorg Med Chem 2012;20:1434–1441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labute P. Derivation and applications of molecular descriptors based on approximate surface area. Methods Mol Biol 2004;275:261–278.
   Google Scholar
• Mayuresh S, Tukaram J, Ujjawala C, Mahanthesh MC, Manish B. QSAR – A novel tool in drug design. Int J Pharm Appl 2010;1:62–75.
   Google Scholar
• Praba GO, Velmurugan D. Quantitative structure-activity relationship of some pesticides. Indian J Biochem Biophys 2007;44:470–476.
   Google Scholar
• Oprea TI. Property distribution of drug-related chemical databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2000;14:251–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available at: www.hyper.com. Accessed on: 3 August 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cho SJ, Tropsha A. Cross-validated R2-guided region selection for comparative molecular field analysis: A simple method to achieve consistent results. J Med Chem 1995;38:1060–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oprea TI, Waller CL. Theoretical and practical aspects of three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships. J Comp Chem 1997;11:127.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers JL, Nicewander WA. Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician 1988;42:59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avram S, Duda-Seiman D, Borcan F, Radu B, Duda-Seiman C, Mihailescu D. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of new mastoparan derivatives using QSAR and computational mutagenesis. Int J Pept Res Ther 2011;17:7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Avram S, Berner H, Milac AL, Wolschann P. Quantitative structure-activity relationship studies on membrane receptors inhibition by antipsychotic drugs. Application to schizophrenia treatment. Monatshefte für Chemie – Chemical Monthly 2008;139:407–26.
   Google Scholar
• Avram S, Mihailescu D, Borcan F, Milac AL. Prediction of improved antimicrobial mastoparan derivatives by 3D-QSARCoMSIA/CoMFA and computational mutagenesis. Monatshefte für Chemie – Chemical Monthly 2012;143:535–43.
   Google Scholar