Compressed images for affinity prediction-2 (CIFAP-2): an improved machine learning methodology on protein–ligand interactions based on a study on caspase 3 inhibitors

References

• Herrling PL. The drug discovery process. In: Imaging in drug discovery and early clinical trials. Springer; 2005:1–14
   Google Scholar
• Jacob L, Vert J-P. Protein-ligand interaction prediction: an improved chemogenomics approach. Bioinformatics 2008;24:2149–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y. Drug design by machine learning: ensemble learning for qsar modeling. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications. Los Angeles (CA): IEEE Computer Society; 2005:187–93
   Google Scholar
• Burbidge R, Trotter M, Buxton B, Holden S. Drug design by machine learning: support vector machines for pharmaceutical data analysis. Comput Chem 2001;26:5–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deng W, Breneman C, Embrechts MJ. Predicting protein-ligand binding anities using novel geometrical descriptors and machine-learning methods. J Chem Inf Model 2004;44:699–703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini A, Shrimpton PJ, Muggleton SH. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming. Proteins 2007;69:823–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Xi L, Wang C, et al. A novel method for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction and the related descriptors exploration. J Comput Chem 2009;30:900–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballester PJ, Mitchell JBO. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking. Bioinformatics 2010;26:1169–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saghaie L, Shahlaei M, Madadkar-Sobhani A. Application of partial least squares and radial basis function neural networks in multivariate imaging analysisquantitative structure activity relationship: study of cyclin dependent kinase 4 inhibitors. J Mol Graphics Modell 2010;29:518–28
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 1996;24:123–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J. Molecular biology of the cell. New York: Garland Science; 2002:125–93
   Google Scholar
• Erdas O, Andac CA, Gurkan-Alp AS, et al. Compressed images for affinity prediction (CIFAP): a study on predicting binding affinities for checkpoint kinase 1 protein inhibitors. J Chemometr 2013;27:155–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney AW. A direct method of nonparametric measurement selection. IEEE Trans Comput 1971;100:1100–3
   Google Scholar
• Drucker H, Burges CJC, Kaufman L, et al. Support vector regression machines. Adv Neural Info Proces Syst 1996;6:155–61
   Google Scholar
• Jang J-SR. Anfis: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 1993;23:665–85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudil P, Novovicová J, Kittler J. Floating search methods in feature selection. Patt Recogn Lett 1994;15:1119–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marill T, Green D. On the effectiveness of receptors in recognition systems. IEEE Trans Informat Theory 1963;9:11–17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang B, Boross PI, Tozser J, Weber IT. Structural and kinetic analysis of caspase-3 reveals role for s5 binding site in substrate recognition. J Mol Biol 2006;360:654–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington HA, Ho KL, Ghosh S, Tung KC. Construction and analysis of a modular model of caspase activation in apoptosis. Theor Biol Med Model 2008;5:26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Mach RH, Reichert DE. Docking and 3d-qsar studies on isatin sulfonamide analogues as caspase-3 inhibitors. J Chem Inf Model 2009;49:1963–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber IT, Fang B, Agniswamy J. Caspases: structure-guided design of drugs to control cell death. Mini Rev Med Chem 2008;8:1154–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Long SA, Murray JH, et al. Potent and selective nonpeptide inhibitors of caspases 3 and 7. J Med Chem 2001;44:2015–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu W, Zhang J, Zeng C, et al. N-benzylisatin sulfonamide analogues as potent caspase-3 inhibitors: synthesis, in vitro activity, and molecular modeling studies. J Med Chem 2005;48:7637–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu W, Rothfuss J, d'Avignon A, et al. Isatin sulfonamide analogs containing a michael addition acceptor: a new class of caspase 3/7 inhibitors. J Med Chem 2007;50:3751–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa K, Funatsu K. New description of protein-ligand interactions using a spherical self-organizing map. Bioorg Med Chem 2012;20:5410–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Long SA, Adams JL, et al. Potent and selective nonpeptide inhibitors of caspases 3 and 7 inhibit apoptosis and maintain cell functionality. J Biol Chem 2000;275:16007–14
   Google Scholar
• Accelrys Software Inc., Discovery Studio Modeling Environment, Release 1.7, San Diego: Accelrys Software Inc. Available from: http://www.accelrys.com/ [last accessed 15 Jul 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Sanner MF. Python: a programming language for software integration and development. J Mol Graph Model 1999;17:57–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott O, Olson AJ. Autodock vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, effcient optimization and multithreading. J Comp Chem 2010;31:455–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, et al. Autodock4 and autodocktools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexiblity. J Comput Chem 2009;16:2785–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATLAB. version 7.12 (R2011a). The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, 2011
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Hadi AS. Regression analysis by example. John Wiley & Sons; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Picard R, Cook D. Cross-validation of regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 1984;79:575–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbraikh A, Tropsha A. Beware of q2! J Mol Graph Model 2002;20:269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tropsha A, Gramatica P, Gombar VK. The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of qspr models. QSAR & Comb Sci 2003;22:69–77
   Google Scholar