Use of ultrasound in the labor and delivery

References

• Chavez MR, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Oyelese Y, Vintzileos AM. Fetal transcerebellar diameter measurements with particular emphasis in the third trimester: a reliable predictor of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:979–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovick TJ, Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Rodis JF, Nochimson DJ. Neonatal survival rates based on estimated fetal weights in extremely premature infants. Am J Perinatol 1989;6:329–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlev A, Walfisch A, Bar-David J, Hershkovitz R, Friger M, Hallak M. Maternal estimation of fetal weight as a complementary method of fetal weight assessment: a prospective clinical trial. J Reprod Med 2006;51:515–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeh-Mestechkin D, Walfisch A, Shachar R, Shoham-Bardi I, Vardi H, Hallak M. Suspected macrosomia? Better not tell. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008;278:225–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noumi G, Collado-Khoury F, Bombard A, Julliard K, Weiner Z. Clinical and sonographic estimation of fetal weight performed during labor by residents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1407–1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Bardin R, Ben-Haroush A. Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used? J Ultrasound Med 2009;28:617–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoscia M, Vimercati A, Ceci O, Vincino M, Selvaggi LE. Estimation of birth weight by two-dimensional ultrasonography: a critical appraisal of its accuracy. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:57–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niziurski P, Piasek G. Accuracy of weight prediction of full term newborns in ultrasonography. Ginekol Pol 2006;77:352–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colman A, Maharaj D, Hutton J, Tuohy J. Reliability of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in term singleton pregnancies. N Z Med J 2006;119:U2146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mongelli M, Benzie R, Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal macrosomia: a comparison of weight prediction models using computer simulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:500–503.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noumi G, Collado-Khoury F, Bombard A, Julliard K, Weiner Z. Clinical and sonographic estimation of fetal weight performed during labor by residents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1407–1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M. Fetal weight estimatin in diabetic pregnancies and suspected fetal macrosomia. J Perinat Med 2004;32:113–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pundir J, Sinha P. Non-diabetic macrosomia: an obstetric dilemma. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;29:200–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abramowicz JS, Rana S, Abramowicz S. Fetal cheek-to-cheek diameter in the prediction of mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1205–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrikovsky BM, Oleschuk C, Lesser M, Gelertner N, Gross B. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using sonographically measured abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness. J Clin Ultrasound 1997;25:378–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pates JA, McIntire DD, Casey VM, Leveno KJ. Predicting macrosomia. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:39–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackmon R, Ferber A, Horani J, O'Reilly Green CP, Divon MY. Combined analysis with amniotic fluid index and estimated fetal weight for prediction of severe macrosomia at birth. Am J obstet Gynecol 2007;196:333e1–333e4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maticot-Baptista D, Collin A, Martin A, Maillet R, Reithmuller D. Prevention of shoulder dystocia by ultrasound selection at the beginning of labour of fetuses with large abdominal circumference. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2007;36:42–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loetworawanit R, Chittacharoen A, Sututvoravut S. Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia. J Med Assoc Thai 2006;89(Suppl 4):S60–S64.
   Google Scholar
• Cromi A, Ghezzi F, DiNaro E, Siesto G, Bergamini V, Raio L. Large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord as a predictor of fetal macrosomia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:861–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SY, Khandelwal M, Gaughan JP, Agar MH, Reece EA. Is the intrapartum biophysical profile useful? Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:471–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson SC, Crawford RA, Spencer JA, Lee A. Intrapartum amniotic fluid index and its relationship to fetal distress. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166(Part1):78–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dawson WB, Dumas MD, Romano WM, Gagnon R, Gratton RJ, Mowbray RD. Translabial ultrasonography and placental previa: does measurement of the os-placenta distance predict outcome? J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:441–446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhide A, Prefumo F, Moore J, Hollis B, Thilaganathan B. Placental edge to internal os distance in the late third trimester and mode of delivery in placenta previa. BJOG 2003;110:860–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Nagi J, Ofili-Yebovi D, Marsh M, Jurcovic D. First-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy evolving into placenta previa/accreta at term. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:1569–1573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo L, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Placental abruption. In: Sciarra JJ, editor. Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2nd ed. Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008 (CD-ROM).
   Google Scholar
• Oyelese Y, Catanzarite V, Prefumo F, Lashley S, Schachter M, Tovbin Y, Goldstein V, Smulian JC. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103(Part 1):937–942.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oyelese Y, Spong C, Fernandez MA, McLaren RA. Second-trimester low-lying placenta and in-vitro fertilization? Exclude vasa previa. J Matern Fetal Med 2000;9:370–372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ, Weinbaum PJ, Mirochnick MA, Escoto DT. Fetal biophysical profile vs. amniocentesis in predicting infection in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:488–494.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs IB, Henrich W, Osthues K, Dudenhausen JW. Sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes presenting with threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:554–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinoza J, Goncalves LF, Romero R, Nien JK, Stites S, Kim YM, Hassan S, Gomez R, Yoon BH, Chaiworapongsa T, Lee W, Mazor M. The prevalence and clinical significance of amniotic fluid “sludge” in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:346–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane SM, Pandis GK, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH. Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:40–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane SM, Guirgis, RR, Higgins, B, Nicolaides KH. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis O, Silveira, R, Zentner, A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, Redarce T, Rudigoz RC. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:868–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, Howard R, Nicholaides KH. Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position. J Matern Fetal Neonatol Med 2002;12:172–177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sherer DM, Midovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O. Intrapartum fetal health position. I. Comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:258–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O. Intrapartum fetal head position. II. Comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:264–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:437–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souka AP, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antasklis A. Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;13:58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Zahalka N, Sadan O, Malinger G, Liberati M, Boaz M, Glezerman M, Rotmensch S. Comparison of transvaginal sonography with digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position in the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:381–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz HP, Lanzarone V. Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:165–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kamena A, Tutschek B. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic land marks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ulltrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:753–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbera A, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte D, Hobbins J. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbera A, Becker T, Macfarlane H, Hobbins J. Assessment of fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Teaching DVD. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2003. p 176.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo L, Romero R. Sonographic evaluation I the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:253–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillipe HJ, Nisand I. Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus. Lancet 1996;347:281–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown MA, Sirlin CB, Farahmand N, Hoyt DB, Casola G. Screening sonography in pregnant patients with blunt abdominal trauma. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:175–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar