Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix

References

• Gudex G. Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2; a prospective audit. NZ Med J 1993;106:78–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Induction of labour. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 9. London: RCOG Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop E. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964;24:266–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange AP, Secher NJ, Westergaard JG, Skovard IB. Prelabor evaluation of inducibility. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ. The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:214–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman H, Verspyck E, Vercoustre L, Degre S, Col JY, Firmin JM, Caron P, Marpeau L. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:357–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel R, Darnaud T, Chalot F, Gonzalez N, Leymarie F, Quereux C. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:254–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware V, Raynor BD. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1030–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno B, San-Frutos L, Salazar F, Perez-Medina T, Engels V, Archilla B, et al Variables that predict the success of labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:1093–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartha JL, Romero-Carmona R, Martinez-Del-Fresno P, Comino-Delgado R. Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasound for preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized clinical trial, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peregrine E, O'Brien P, Omar R, Jauniaux E. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggebø TM, Heien C, Okland I, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:199–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keepanasseril A, Suri V, Bagga R, Aggarwal N. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;47:389–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonen R, Degani S, Ron A. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and Bishop score. Eur J Ultrasound 1998;7:183–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chandra S, Crane JM, Hutchens D, Young DC. Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:2–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenberg P, Chevret S, Chastang C, Ville Y. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score. BJOG 2005;112:192–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis FM, Gervasi MT, Florio P, Bracalente G, Fadalti M, Severi FM, et al Prediction of successful induction of labor at term: role of clinical history, digital examination, ultrasound assessment of the cervix, and fetal fibronectin assay. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1361–1367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM, Delaney T, Butt KD, Bennett KA, Hutchens D, Young DC. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:319–323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park KH. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women. J Korean Med Sci 2007;22:722–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutanen EM, Karkkainen TH, Lehtovirta J, Uotila JT, Hinkula MK, Hartikainen AL. Evaluation of a rapid strip test for insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in the diagnosis of ruptured fetal membranes. Clin Chim Acta 1996;253:91–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuutila M, Hiilesmaa V, Karkkainen T, Ylikorkala O, Rutanen EM. Phosphorylated isoforms of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in the cervix as a predictor of cervical ripeness. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:243–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kekki M, Kurki T, Karkkainen T, Hiilesmaa V, Paavonen J, Rutanen EM. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 in cervical secretion as a predictor of preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:546–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembet A, Eroglu D, Ergin T, Kuscu E, Zeyneloglu H, Batioglu S, et al New rapid bed-side test to predict preterm delivery: phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in cervical secretions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:706–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akercan F, Kazandi M, Sendag F, Cirpan T, Mgoyi L, Terek MC, et al Value of cervical phosphorylated insulinlike growth factor binding protein-1 in the prediction of preterm labor. J Reprod Med 2004;49:368–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akercan F, Cirpan T, Kazandi M, Terek MC, Mgoyi L, Ozkinay E. The value of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in the cervical-vaginal secretion detected by immunochromatographic dipstick test in the prediction of delivery in women with clinically unconfirmed preterm premature rupture of membranes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;121:159–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonek J, Shellhaas C. Cervical sonography: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:71–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 31. London: RCOG Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Law LW, Lau TK. Prediction of intrapartum Cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre-version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:416–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam H, Leung WC, Lee CP, Lao TT. The use of fetal Doppler cerebroplacental blood flow and amniotic fluid volume measurement in the surveillance of postdated pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:844–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar