Comparative study of Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr cesarean techniques: a randomized controlled trial

References

• Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai M, Shah A, Novikova N. Techniques for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;23: CD004662. Review.
   Google Scholar
• Federici D, Lacelli B, Muggiasca L, Agarossi A, Cipolla L, Conti M. Cesarean section using the Misgav Ladach method. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;57:273–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren G, Sjöholm L, Stark M. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:615–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier P, Ayres-De-Campos D, Reynolds A, Guimaraes M, Costa Santos C, Patricio B. The modified Misgav-Ladach versus the Pfannenstiel- Kerr technique for cesarean section: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:878–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulas T, Habek D, Karsa M, Bobic-Vukovic M. Modified Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: clinical experience. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2008;65:222–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres-de-Campos D, Patricio B. Modifications to the Misgav Ladach technique for cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:326–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark M, Chavkin Y, Kupfersztain C, Guedj P, Finkel AR. Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1995;48:273–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauth JC, Owen J, Davis R. Transverse uterine incision closure: one versus two layers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1108–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker JM, Hauth JC, Hodgkins P, Owen J, Winkler CL. Trial of labor after one- or two-layer closure of a low trans verse uterine incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:545–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Di Naro E, Miglierina M, Agosti M, et al Joel-Cohen or Pfannenstiel incision at cesarean delivery: does it make a difference? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:1040–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark M, Finkel AR. Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994;53:121–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darj E, Nordström M-L. The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel method. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:37–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathai M, Ambersheth S, George A. Comparison of two transverse abdominal incisions for cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;78:47–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björklund K, Kimaro M, Urassa E, Lindmark G. Introduction of the Misgav Ladach caesarean section at an African tertiary centre: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2000;107:209–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari AG, Frigerio L, Candotti G, Origoni M, Mariani A, Petrone M. Modified Stark procedure for cesarean section. First Italian experience. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;3:95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Grundsell HS, Rizk DEE, Kumar RM. Randomized study of non-closure of peritoneum in lower segment cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77:110–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagele F, Karas H, Spitzer D, Staudach A, Karasegh S, Beck A, et al Closure or non-closure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1366–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatusić Z, Kurjak A, Jasarević E, Hafner T. The Misgav Ladach method – a step forward in operative technique in obstetrics. J Perinat Med 2003;31:395–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Balestreri D, Beretta P, Maymon E, et al A randomized clinical trial of two surgical techniques for cesarean section. Am J Perinatol 1998;15:589–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallin G, Fall O. Modified Joel-Cohen technique for cesarean delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:221–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varga P, Bodis J. Comparative evaluation of the Misgav Ladach cesarean section with two traditional techniques. The first four years' experience. Letter. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:90–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen J, Andrews WW. Wound complications after cesarean sections. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994;37:842–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Valle GO, Coombs P, Qualls C, Curet LB. Does closure of Camper fascia reduce the incidence of postcesarean superficial wound disruption? Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:1013–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naumann RW, Hauth JC, Owens J, Hodgkins PM, Lincoln T. Aproximation of the subcutaneous tissue lowers the incidence of wound complications after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:341.
   Google Scholar