First trimester 3D volumetry. Association of the gestational volumes with the birth weight

References

• Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, Kim SM, Han BK, Kim EK, Kim MH, Chung SY, Choi HY, Im JG. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional US. Radiology 2006;240:26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang K, Rogers AJ, Light ED, von Allmen D, Smith SW. Three-dimensional ultrasound guidance of autonomous robotic breast biopsy: feasibility study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010;36:173–177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irwin MR, Downey DB, Gardi L, Fenster A. Registered 3-D ultrasound and digital stereotactic mammography for breast biopsy guidance. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008;27:391–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang SF, Chang RF, Moon WK, Lee YH, Chen DR, Suri JS. Analysis of tumor vascularity using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008;27: 320–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang RF, Chang-Chien KC, Takada E, Suri JS, Moon WK, Wu JH, Cho N, Wang YF, Chen DR. Breast density analysis in 3-D whole breast ultrasound images. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006;1:2795–2798.
   Google Scholar
• Hosny IA, Elghawabit HS, Mosaad MM. The role of 2D, 3D ultrasound and color doppler in the diagnosis of benign and malignant endometrial lesions. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2007;19: 275–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghate SV, Crockett MM, Boyd BK, Paulson EK. Sonohysterography: do 3D reconstructed images provide additional value? Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:W227–W233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupesic S, Plavsic BM. Adnexal torsion: color Doppler and three-dimensional ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 2010;35:602–620.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vizer M, Kiesel L, Szabó I, Arany A, Tamás P, Szilágyi A. Assessment of three-dimensional sonographic features of polycystic ovaries after laparoscopic ovarian electrocautery. Fertil Steril 2007;88:894–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amer A, Hammadeh ME, Kolkailah M, Ghandour AA. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional ultrasound measurement of follicular volume: are they comparable? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2003;268:155–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Järvelä IY, Mason HD, Sladkevicius P, Kelly S, Ojha K, Campbell S, Nargund G. Characterization of normal and polycystic ovaries using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography. J Assist Reprod Genet 2002;19:582–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan HA, Cheng YC, Li CH, Wu MH, Chang FM. Ovarian stroma flow intensity decreases by age: a three-dimensional power doppler ultrasonographic study. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28: 425–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapaire O, Alder J, Peukert R, Holzgreve W, Tercanli S. Two- versus three-dimensional ultrasound in the second and third trimester of pregnancy: impact on recognition and maternal-fetal bonding. A prospective pilot study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007;276:475–479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gadelha PS, Da Costa AG, Filho FM, El Beitune P. Amniotic fluid volumetry by three-dimensional ultrasonography during the first trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32:1135–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Kanenishi K, Akiyama M, Tanaka H, Kimura K. Real-time 3-D sonographic observation of fetal facial expression. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2005;31:337–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CH, Yu CH, Ko HC, Chang FM, Chen HY. Prenatal assessment of normal fetal humerus volume by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:1675–1680.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B. Three-dimensional US of the fetus: volume imaging. Radiology 2006;238:988–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash CJ, Treece GM, Berman LH, Gee AH, Prager RW. 3D reconstruction of the skeletal anatomy of the normal neonatal foot using 3D ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2005;78:587–589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michailidis GD, Papageorgiou P, Morris RW, Economides DL. The use of three-dimensional ultrasound for fetal gender determination in the first trimester. Br J Radiol 2003;76:448–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves LF, Nien JK, Espinoza J, Kusanovic JP, Lee W, Swope B, Soto E, Treadwell MC, Romero R. What does 2-dimensional imaging add to 3- and 4-dimensional obstetric ultrasonography? J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:691–699.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fang KH, Wu JL, Chen M, Yeh GP, Chou PH, Hsu JC, Hsieh CT. Prenatal sonographic features of hypospadia: two- and three-dimensional findings. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2006;45:53–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen CP, Chang TY, Chern SR, Wang W. Third-trimester 3D ultrasound evaluation of thanatophoric dysplasia type I. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2007;46:281–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tseng JJ, Chou MM, Chen WH. Prenatal 3- and 4-dimensional ultrasonographic findings of giant fetal nuchal hemangioma. J Chin Med Assoc 2007;70:460–463.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nardozza LM, Araújo Júnior E, Simioni C, Torloni MR, Moron AF. Evolution of 3-D power Doppler indices of fetal brain in normal pregnancy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009;35:545–549.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang CH, Tsai PY, Yu CH, Ko HC, Chang FM. Predicting fetal growth restriction with renal volume using 3-D ultrasound: efficacy evaluation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008;34: 533–537.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hackmon R, Le Scale KB, Horani J, Ferber A, Divon MY. Is severe macrosomia manifested at 11–14 weeks of gestation? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:740–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorsell M, Kaijser M, Almstroms H, Amdolf E. Large fetal size in early pregnancy associated with macrosomia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:390–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GCS, Smith MFS, McNay MB, Fleming JEE. First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight. NEJM 1998;339:1817–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukowski R, Smith GSC, Malone FE, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Hankins GDV, Berkowitz RL, Gross SJ, DugoffL, Craigo SD, Timot-Trisch IE, Carr SR, Wolfe HM, D'Alton ME. BMJ 2007; FASTER Research Consortium. Fetal growth in early pregnancy and risk of delivering low birth weight infant:prospective cohort study 2007;334–836.
   Google Scholar
• Rolo LC, Nardozza LMM, Araujo E Jr, Nowak PM, Bortoletti Filho J, Moron AF. Measurement of embryo volume at 7–10 weeks' gestation by 3D-sonography. J Obstet Gynecol 2009;29:188–191.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nardozza LM, Nowak PM, Araujo Junior E, Guimaraes Filho HA, Rolo TC, Tprloni MR, Moron AF. Evaluation of placental volume at 7–10+6 weeks of pregnancy by 3D-sonography. Placenta 2009;30:585–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolo TC, Nardozza LM, Araujo Junior E, Nowak PM, Moron AF. Gestational sac volume by 3D-sonography at 7–10 weeks of pregnancy using the VOCAL method. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009;279:821–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson HP, Fleming JEE. A critical evaluation of sonar crown rump length measurements. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1975;82:702–710.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blaas H-G, Taipale P, Torp H, Eik-Nes SH. Three-dimensional ultrasound volume calculations of human embryos and young fetuses: a study on the volumetry of compound structures and its reproducibility. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:640–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccabona M, Nelson TR, Pretorius DH. Three-dimensional ultrasound: accuracy of distance and volume measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7:429–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar