Cervical funneling after cerclage in cervical incompetence as a predictor of pregnancy outcome

References

• Stromme WB, Haywa EW. Intrauterine fetal death in the second trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963;85:223–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann EC, McLaren WD, Hoyt OB. The physiology and clinical significance of the uterine isthmus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961;81:209–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’ Brien JM, Hill AL, Barton JR. Funneling to the stitch: an informative ultrasonographic finding after cervical cerclage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:252–255.
   Google Scholar
• Iam JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper RLL, Johnson F, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med 1996;334:567–572.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasegawa I, Tanaka K, Takahashi K, Tanaka T, Aoki K, Torii Y, Okai T, Saji F, Takahashi T, Sato K, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical assessment for the prediction of preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Med 1996;5:305–309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, Dang K, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC, Wolfe HM. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length < or = 15mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1458–1467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibard JU, Tart M, Moawad AH. Cervical length at 16–22 weeks’ gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:972–978.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guzman ER, Walters C, Ananth CV, O’Reilly-Green C, Benito CW, Palermo A, Vintzileos AM. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:204–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Sonographic measurement of the uterine cervix at 18–22 weeks gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:902–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Walters C, O’Reilly-Green C, Kinzler WL, Waldron R, Nigam J, Vintzileos AM. Use of cervical ultrasonography in prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1103–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JH, Kuhlman K, Daly S, Berghella V. Prediction of preterm birth by second trimester cervical sonography in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:288–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Owen J, MacPherson C, Yost N, Swain M, Dildy GA III, Miodovnik M, Langer O, Sibai B. Natural history of cervical funneling in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:863–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs-Jimenez J, Neubert AG. The microbiological effects ofendovaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length. JUltraound Med 2002;21:727–729.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dutta RL, Economides DL. Patient acceptance of transvaginal sonography in the early pregnancy unit setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:503–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell T, Leslie JR, Chien PF, Agustsson P. The reliability and validity of three dimensional ultrasound volumetric measurements using an in vitro Balloon and in vivo uterine model. BJOG 2001;108:573–582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Severi FJ, Bocchi C, Florio P, Picciolini E, D’Aniello G, Petraglia F. Comparsion of two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of the cervix to predict preterm delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:1261–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bega G, Lev-Toaff A, Kuhlman K, Berghella V, Parker L, Goldberg B, Wapner R. Three-dimensional multiplanar transvaginal ultrasound of the cervix in pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:351–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger M, Weber-Rossler T, Willmann M. Measurement of the pregnant cervix by transvaginal sonography: an interobserver study and new standards to improve the interobserver variability. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:188–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iam JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper RL, Johnson F, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Eng J Med 1996;334:567–572.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hibbard JU, Snow J, Moawad AH. Short cervical length by ultrasound and cerclage. J Perinatol 2000;3:161–165.
   Google Scholar
• de Carvalho MH, Bittar RE, Brizot Mde L, Bicudo C, Zugaib M. Prediction of preterm delivery in the second trimester. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:532–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To MS, Skentou C, Liao AW, Cacho A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length and funneling at 23 weeks of gestation in the prediction of spontaneous early preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:200–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung TN, Pang MW, Leung TY, Poon CF, Wong SM, Lau TK. Cervical length at 18–22 weeks of gestation for prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in Hong Kong Chinese women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:713–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust OA, Atlas RO, Kimmel S, Roberts WE, Hess LW. Does the presence of a funnel increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcome in a patient with a short cervix? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1060–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, Mazor M, Sorokin Y, Goncalves L, Treadwell M. Ultrasonographic examination of the cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of preterm delivery in patients with premature labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:956–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann K, Thorp JM, McDonald TL, Savitz DA, Granados JL. Cervical dimensions and risk of preterm birth: a perspective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:504–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzman ER, Walters C, Ananth CV, O’Reilly-Green C, Benito CW, Palermo A, Vintzileos AM. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:204–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar