References
- Heinrich J. [A central fetal monitoring system in the labor room] [Article in German]. Zentralbl Gynakol 1976;98(16):976–981.
- Tucker SM. Pocket Guide to Fetal Monitoring. Mosby-Year Book. 2nd edition, 1992.
- Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. The advantages of computerized fetal heart rate analysis. J Perinat Med 1991;19(1–2):39–45.
- Searle JR, Devoe LD, Phillips MC, Searle NS. Computerized analysis of resting fetal heart rate tracings. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71(3 Pt 1):407–411.
- Maeda K. Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms and fetal movements. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1990;4(4):797–813.
- Bernardes J, Moura C, de Sa JP, Leite LP. The Porto system for automated cardiotocographic signal analysis. J Perinat Med 1991;19(1–2):61–65.
- Ayres-de-Campos D, Sousa P, Costa A, Bernardes J. Omniview-SisPorto 3.5 – a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram + ST event analysis. J Perinat Med 2008;36(3):260–264.
- Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, van Geijn HP, Pereira-Leite L. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1997;57(1):33–7.
- Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Pereira-Leite L. Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106(12):1307–1310.
- Bernardes J, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa-Pereira A, Pereira-Leite L, Garrido A. Objective computerized fetal heart rate analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998;62(2):141–147.
- Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J. Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005;118(1):52–60.
- Pattison N, McCowan L. Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD001068.
- Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(3):CD006066.
- Gagnon R, Bocking AD, Richardson BS, McLean P. A flat decelerative fetal heart rate tracing with normal fetal heart rate variability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171(5):1379–1381.
- Weiss PM, Balducci J, Reed J, Klasko SK, Rust OA. Does centralized monitoring affect perinatal outcome? J Matern Fetal Med 1997;6(6):317–319.
- Withiam-Leitch M, Shelton J, Fleming E. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate. Birth 2006;33(4):284–288.
- Ayres-de Campos D, Bernardes J, Garrido A, Marques-de-Sa J, Pereira-Leite L. SisPorto 2.0: a program for automated analysis of cardiotocograms. J Matern Fetal Med 2000;9(5):311–318.
- Obstetrical data management systems. Health Devices 1997;26(3):84–122.
- Amaral J, Costa C, Ayres-de Campos D, Bernardes J. Impact of a computer-derived “normal” alert on the duration of antepartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Ginecol Port 2008;(suppl 1):208.
- Goncalves H, Rocha AP, Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J. Internal versus external intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring: the effect on linear and nonlinear parameters. Physiol Meas 2006;27(3):307–319.
- Bakker PC, Colenbrander GJ, Verstraeten AA, Van Geijn HP. The quality of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;116(1):22–27.