Characterizing maternal glycemic control: a more informative approach using semiparametric regression

References

• McElvy SS, Miodovnik M, Rosenn B, Khoury JC, Siddiqi T, Dignan PS, Tsang RC. A focused preconceptional and early pregnancy program in women with type 1 diabetes reduces perinatal mortality and malformation rates to general population levels. J Matern Fetal Med 2000;9:14–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langer O, Conway DL. Level of glycemia and perinatal outcome in pregestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Med 2000;9:35–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bollepalli S, Dolan LM, Miodovnik M, Feghali M, Khoury JC. Asymmetric large-for-gestational-age infants of type 1 diabetic women: morbidity and abdominal growth. Am J Perinatol 2010;27:603–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1047–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence JM, Contreras R, Chen W, Sacks DA. Trends in the prevalence of preexisting diabetes and gestational diabetes mellitus among a racially/ethnically diverse population of pregnant women, 1999-2005. Diabetes Care 2008;31:899–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai MM. A mathematical model for the determination of total area under glucose tolerance and other metabolic curves. Diabetes Care 1994;172:152–154.
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick ES, Rigby AS, Goode K, Atkin SL. Relating mean blood glucose and glucose variability to the risk of multiple episodes of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2007;50:2553–2561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Service FJ, Molnar GD, Rosevear JW, Ackerman E, Gatewood LC, Taylor WF. Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability. Diabetes 1970;19:644–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichtkrull J, Munck O, Jersild M. The m-valve, an index of blood-sugar control in diabetics. Acta Med Scand 1965;177:95–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnar GD, Taylor WF, Ho MM. Day-to-day variation of continuously monitored glycaemia: a further measure of diabetic instability. Diabetologia 1972;8:342–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegelaar SE, Holleman F, Hoekstra JB, DeVries JH. Glucose variability; does it matter? Endocr Rev 2010;31:171–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanovic L. Using meal-based self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) data to guide dietary recommendations in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:1023–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert PC, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Halligan AW, Shennan A. Analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitor data using a hierarchical model incorporating restricted cubic splines and heterogeneous within-subject variances. Stat Med 2001;20:3789–3805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppert D, Wand MP, Carroll RJ. Semiparametric Regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wand MP. A comparison of regression spline smoothing procedures. Comput Stat 2000;15:443–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shults J, Whitt MC, Kumanyika S. Analysis of data with multiple sources of correlation in the framework of generalized estimating equations. Stat Med 2004;23:3209–3226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O. SAS for Mixed Models, 2nd Edition. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC, USA; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ngo L, Wand MP. Smoothing with mixed model software. J Stat Software 2004;9:1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert D. Selecting the number of knots for penalized splines. J Comput Graph Stat 2002;11:735–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maringwa JT, Geys H, Shkedy Z, Faes C, Molenberghs G, Aerts M, Ammel KV, et al. Application of semiparametric mixed models and simultaneous confidence bands in a cardiovascular safety experiment with longitudinal data. J Biopharm Stat 2008;18:1043–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike H. Maxmimum likelihood identification to Gaussian autoregressive moving average models. Biometrika 1973;60:255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilers PHC, Marx BD. Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties. Stat Science 1996;11:89–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Nelder JA, Pawitan Y. Generalized Linear Models with Random Effects: Unified Analysis via H-Likelihood. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay JO, Silverman BW. Functional Data Analysis. Springer, New York, USA; 1997. Chapter 1.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe SJ, Heller GZ, Leader LR. Functional data analysis with application to periodically stimulated foetal heart rate data. II: functional logistic regression. Stat Med 2002;21:1115–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behseta S, Kass RE. Testing equality of two functions using BARS. Stat Med 2005;24:3523–3534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez A, Dunson DB, Gelfand AE. Bayesian Nonparametric Functional Data Analysis Through Density Estimation. Biometrika 2009;96:149–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Jovanovic L, Hod M, Phillip M. Continuous glucose monitoring for the evaluation and improved control of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;14:256–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerssen A, Evers IM, de Valk HW, Visser GH. Poor glucose control in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus and ‘safe’ hemoglobin A1c values in the first trimester of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;13:309–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molenberghs G, Kenward KG. Missing Data in Clinical Studies, John Wiley and Sons, London, UK; 2007.
   Google Scholar