Transabdominal evaluation of uterine cervical length during pregnancy fails to identify a substantial number of women with a short cervix

References

• Berghella V, Baxter JK, Hendrix NW. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(3): CD007235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskalakis G, Thomakos N, Hatziioannou L, Mesogitis S, Papantoniou N, Antsaklis A. Cervical assessment in women with threatened preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;17:309–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa I, Tanaka K, Takahashi K, Tanaka T, Aoki K, Torii Y, Okai Tet al. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical assessment for the prediction of preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Med 1996;5:305–309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honest H, Bachmann LM, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:305–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD. Prediction and early detection of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:402–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R. Prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: the role of sonographic cervical length in identifying patients who may benefit from progesterone treatment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:675–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenberg P, Gillet A, Ville Y. Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:302–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To MS, Skentou CA, Royston P, Yu CK, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of patient-specific risk of early preterm delivery using maternal history and sonographic measurement of cervical length: a population-based prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:362–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh A, Nicolaides K. Cervical screening for preterm delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002;14:195–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM, Hutchens D. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:579–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM, Hutchens D. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in asymptomatic high-risk women with a short cervical length in the previous pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:38–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnwald CP, Walker H, Lundy JC, Iams JD. Rates of recurrent preterm birth by obstetrical history and cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1170–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:312–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 1996;334:567–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, MacPherson C, Swain M, Dildy GA 3rd, Miodovnik M, et al.; Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Can shortened midtrimester cervical length predict very early spontaneous preterm birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:298–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen J, Szychowski JM, Hankins G, Iams JD, Sheffield JS, Perez-Delboy A, Berghella V, et al.; Vaginal Ultrasound Trial Consortium. Does midtrimester cervical length =25 mm predict preterm birth in high-risk women? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:393.e1–393.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V. Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18-22 weeks’ gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:902–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Renzo GC, Roura LC, Facchinetti F, Antsaklis A, Breborowicz G, Gratacos E, Husslein P, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous preterm labor: identification of spontaneous preterm labor, diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes, and preventive tools for preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:659–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, Dang K, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC, Wolfe HM. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length < or =15 mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1458–1467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaisbuch E, Romero R, Erez O, Kusanovic JP, Mazaki-Tovi S, Gotsch F, Romero Vet al. Clinical significance of early (< 20 weeks) vs. late (20-24 weeks) detection of sonographic short cervix in asymptomatic women in the mid-trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:471–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik E, To M, Gajewska K, Smith GC, Nicolaides KH; Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Cervical length and obstetric history predict spontaneous preterm birth: development and validation of a model to provide individualized risk assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:549–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovsepian DM, Auyeung A, Ratts VS. A combined surgical and radiologic technique for creating a functional neo-endocervical canal in a case of partial congenital cervical atresia. Fertil Steril 1999;71:158–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rock JA, Roberts CP, Jones HW. Congenital anomalies of the uterine cervix: lessons from 30 cases managed clinically by a common protocol. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1858–1863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acién P, Acién MI, Quereda F, Santoyo T. Cervicovaginal agenesis: spontaneous gestation at term after previous reimplantation of the uterine corpus in a neovagina: Case Report. Hum Reprod 2008;23:548–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anum EA, Hill LD, Pandya A, Strauss JF 3rd. Connective tissue and related disorders and preterm birth: clues to genes contributing to prematurity. Placenta 2009;30:207–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortoft G, Henriksen T, Hansen E, Petersen L. After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy. BJOG 2010;117:258–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CP, Rock JA. Surgical methods in the treatment of congenital anomalies of the uterine cervix. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011;23:251–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer RL, Sveinbjornsson G, Hansen C. Cervical sonography in pregnant women with a prior cone biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:613–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan S, Romero R, Hendler I, Gomez R, Khalek N, Espinoza J, Nien JK, et al. A sonographic short cervix as the only clinical manifestation of intra-amniotic infection. J Perinat Med 2006;34:13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KH, Hong JS, Kang WS, Shin DM. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting intra-amniotic infection and impending preterm delivery in preterm labor: a comparison with amniotic fluid white blood cell count. J Perinat Med 2008;36:479–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, Hassan S, Erez O, Chaiworapongsa T, Mazor M. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG 2006;113 Suppl 3:17–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Espinoza J, Gonçalves LF, Kusanovic JP, Friel L, Hassan S. The role of inflammation and infection in preterm birth. Semin Reprod Med 2007;25:21–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaisbuch E, Hassan SS, Mazaki-Tovi S, Nhan-Chang CL, Kusanovic JP, Chaiworapongsa T, Dong Z, et al. Patients with an asymptomatic short cervix (<or=15 mm) have a high rate of subclinical intraamniotic inflammation: implications for patient counseling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:433.e1–433.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaisbuch E, Romero R, Mazaki-Tovi S, Erez O, Kusanovic JP, Mittal P, Gotsch F, et al. The risk of impending preterm delivery in asymptomatic patients with a nonmeasurable cervical length in the second trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:446.e1–446.e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrachnis N, Vitoratos N, Iliodromiti Z, Sifakis S, Deligeoroglou E, Creatsas G. Intrauterine inflammation and preterm delivery. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010;1205:118–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer DG, Keeler SM, Rust OA, Wayock CP, Vintzileos AM, Hanna N. Is midtrimester short cervix a sign of intraamniotic inflammation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:374.e1–374.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlembach D, Mackay L, Shi L, Maner WL, Garfield RE, Maul H. Cervical ripening and insufficiency: from biochemical and molecular studies to in vivo clinical examination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;144 Suppl 1:S70–S76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ventolini G, Neiger R. Management of painless mid-trimester cervical dilatation: Prophylactic vs emergency placement of cervical cerclage. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;28:24–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feingold M, Brook I, Zakut H. Detection of cervical incompetence by ultrasound. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984;63:407–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haluska GJ, Cook MJ, Novy MJ. Inhibition and augmentation of progesterone production during pregnancy: effects on parturition in rhesus monkeys. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:682–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Espinoza J, Erez O, Hassan S. The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Mackeen AD.. Cervical length screening with ultrasound-indicated cerclage compared with history-indicated cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:148–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieroszewski P, Jasinski A, Perenc M, Banach R, Oszukowski P. The Arabin pessary for the treatment of threatened mid-trimester miscarriage or premature labour and miscarriage: a case series. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:469–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber-Trojnar Z, Patro-Malysza J, Leszczynska-Gorzelak B, Marciniak B, Oleszczuk J. Pessary use for the treatment of cervical incompetence and prevention of preterm labour. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:1493–1499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Fonseca EB, Bittar RE, Damião R, Zugaib M.. Prematurity prevention: the role of progesterone. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009;21:142–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell S. Universal cervical-length screening and vaginal progesterone prevents early preterm births, reduces neonatal morbidity and is cost saving: doing nothing is no longer an option. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFranco EA, O’Brien JM, Adair CD, Lewis DF, Hall DR, Fusey S, Soma-Pillay P, et al. Vaginal progesterone is associated with a decrease in risk for early preterm birth and improved neonatal outcome in women with a short cervix: a secondary analysis from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:697–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca EB, Celik E, Parra M, Singh M, Nicolaides KH; Fetal Medicine Foundation Second Trimester Screening Group. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med 2007;357:462–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan SS, Romero R, Vidyadhari D, Fusey S, Baxter JK, Khandelwal M, Vijayaraghavan J, et al.; PREGNANT Trial. Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:18–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetingoz E, Cam C, Sakalli M, Karateke A, Celik C, Sancak A. Progesterone effects on preterm birth in high-risk pregnancies: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;283:423–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rode L, Langhoff-Roos J, Andersson C, Dinesen J, Hammerum MS, Mohapeloa H, Tabor A. Systematic review of progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:1180–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim AC, Goossens A, Ravelli AC, Boer K, Bruinse HW, Mol BW. Use of progesterone treatment for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth: identification of obstacles to change. Am J Perinatol 2010;27:241–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd JM, Flenady VJ, Cincotta R, Crowther CA.. Progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:127–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A, Tabor A, O’Brien J, Cetingoz Eet al. Vaginal progesterone in women with an asymptomatic sonographic short cervix in the midtrimester decreases preterm delivery and neonatal morbidity: a systematic review and metaanalysis of individual patient data Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:124.e1–124.e19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen HF. Transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 1991;19:77–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Novakov A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:304–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacio M, Cobo T, Bosch J, Filella X, Navarro-Sastre A, Ribes A, Gratacós E. Cervical length and gestational age at admission as predictors of intra-amniotic inflammation in preterm labor with intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:441–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzberg BS, Livingston E, DeLong DM, McNally PJ, Fazekas CK, Kliewer MA. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix: transperineal versus endovaginal imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:1071–8; quiz 1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo G, Capponi A, Angelini E, Vlachopoulou A, Grassi C, Romanini C. The value of transvaginal ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting preterm delivery in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okitsu O, Mimura T, Nakayama T, Aono T. Early prediction of preterm delivery by transvaginal ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2:402–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, Hayashi RH. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:859–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbard JU, Tart M, Moawad AH. Cervical length at 16-22 weeks’ gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:972–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco BP, Garrone C. Can examination of the cervix provide useful information for prediction of cervical incompetence and following preterm labour? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;39:296–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Li W, Yang T. [Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix in pregnancy]. Hua Xi Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 1999;30:208–9, 213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown JE, Thieme GA, Shah DM, Fleischer AC, Boehm FH. Transabdominal and transvaginal endosonography: evaluation of the cervix and lower uterine segment in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:721–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul LL, Kurtzman JT, Hagemann C, Ghamsary M, Wing DA. Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment? J Ultrasound Med 2008;27:1305–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone PR, Chan EH, McCowan LM, Taylor RS, Mitchell JM; SCOPE Consortium. Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;50:523–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger M, Weber-Rössler T, Willmann M. Measurement of the pregnant cervix by transvaginal sonography: an interobserver study and new standards to improve the interobserver variability. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:188–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:85–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Requejo JH, Rubens C, et al. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ 2010;88:31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korvenranta E, Lehtonen L, Rautava L, Häkkinen U, Andersson S, Gissler M, Hallman M, et al.; PERFECT Preterm Infant Study Group. Impact of very preterm birth on health care costs at five years of age. Pediatrics 2010;125:e1109–e1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V. Every 30 seconds a baby dies of preterm birth. What are you doing about it? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:416–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler JC, Hebra A. Necrotizing enterocolitis in infants with very low birth weight. Semin Pediatr Surg 2000;9:63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Walsh MC, Hale EC, et al.; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010;126:443–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrou S, Abangma G, Johnson S, Wolke D, Marlow N. Costs and health utilities associated with extremely preterm birth: evidence from the EPICure study. Value Health 2009;12:1124–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistry H, Dowie R, Franklin RC, Jani BR. Costs of neonatal care for low-birthweight babies in English hospitals. Acta Paediatr 2009;98:1123–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colin AA, McEvoy C, Castile RG. Respiratory morbidity and lung function in preterm infants of 32 to 36 weeks’ gestational age. Pediatrics 2010;126:115–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooqi A, Hägglöf B, Sedin G, Serenius F. Impact at age 11 years of major neonatal morbidities in children born extremely preterm. Pediatrics 2011;127:e1247–e1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green NS, Damus K, Simpson JL, Iams J, Reece EA, Hobel CJ, Merkatz IR, et al.; March Of Dimes Scientific Advisory Committee On Prematurity. Research agenda for preterm birth: recommendations from the March of Dimes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:626–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moster D, Lie RT, Markestad T. Long-term medical and social consequences of preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2008;359:262–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrianakos-Hoobler AI, Msall ME, Huo D, Marks JD, Plesha-Troyke S, Schreiber MD. Predicting school readiness from neurodevelopmental assessments at age 2 years after respiratory distress syndrome in infants born preterm. Dev Med Child Neurol 2010;52:379–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker SM, Franck LS, Fitzgerald M, Myles J, Stocks J, Marlow N. Long-term impact of neonatal intensive care and surgery on somatosensory perception in children born extremely preterm. Pain 2009;141:79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer C, Urlesberger B, Maurer-Fellbaum U, Kutschera J, Müller W. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years in 23 to 26 weeks old gestation infants. Klin Padiatr 2007;219:23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes, Board on Health Sciences Policy. Preterm Birth Causes, Consequences, and Prevention, Behrman RE, Butler AS (eds). Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. The National Academies Press: Washington D.C., 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-Costello D. Risk factors for neurologic impairment among very low-birth-weight infants. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2001;8:120–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hou C, Norcia AM, Madan A, Tith S, Agarwal R, Good WV. Visual cortical function in very low birth weight infants without retinal or cerebral pathology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:9091–9098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecsedy M, Varsányi B, Szigeti A, Szrnka G, Németh J, Récsán Z. Cone function in children with a history of preterm birth. Doc Ophthalmol 2011;122:141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn GE, Gilbert C, Darlow BA, Zin A. Retinopathy of prematurity: an epidemic in the making. Chin Med J 2010;123:2929–2937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamholz KL, Cole CH, Gray JE, Zupancic JA. Cost-effectiveness of early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics 2009;123:262–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pau H. Retinopathy of prematurity: clinic and pathogenesis. Disproportion between apoptosis of vitreal and proliferation of retinal vascularization. Ophthalmologica 2008;222:220–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamrick SE, Hansmann G. Patent ductus arteriosus of the preterm infant. Pediatrics 2010;125:1020–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farstad T, Bratlid D, Medbø S, Markestad T; Norwegian Extreme Prematurity Study Group. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia - prevalence, severity and predictive factors in a national cohort of extremely premature infants. Acta Paediatr 2011;100:53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle LW, Anderson PJ. Pulmonary and neurological follow-up of extremely preterm infants. Neonatology 2010;97:388–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill AG, Odibo AO, Caughey AB, Stamilio DM, Hassan SS, Macones GA, Romero R. Universal cervical length screening and treatment with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth: a decision and economic analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:548.e1–548.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner EF, Han CS, Pettker CM, Buhimschi CS, Copel JA, Funai EF, Thung SF. Universal cervical-length screening to prevent preterm birth: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:32–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeanty P, d’Alton M, Romero R, Hobbins JC. Perineal scanning. Am J Perinatol 1986;3:289–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushnir O, Vigil DA, Izquierdo L, Schiff M, Curet LB. Vaginal ultrasonographic assessment of cervical length changes during normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:991–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH. Methods of sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnancy: a review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006;19:755–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podobnik M, Bulic M, Smiljanic N, Bistricki J. Ultrasonography in the detection of cervical incompetency. J Clin Ultrasound 1988;16:383–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonek JD, Iams JD, Blumenfeld M, Johnson F, Landon M, Gabbe S. Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:172–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstine RL, Lee SH, Crawford WL, Shimek MP. Sonographic evaluation of the incompetent cervix. J Clin Ultrasound 1981;9:417–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemlyn S. The length of the uterine cervix and its significance. J Clin Ultrasound 1981;9:267–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson JN, Economy KE, Feinberg BR, Norwitz ER. Cervical hydrosonography in pregnancy to assess cervical length by transabdominal ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:1023–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dongen L. Ultrasonography of the cervix. S Afr Med J 1984; 65:82–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Mazor M, Gomez R, Gonzalez R, Galasso M, Cotton D. Cervix, incompetence and premature labor. The Fetus 1993;3:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• To MS, Skentou C, Cicero S, Nicolaides KH. Cervical assessment at the routine 23-weeks’ scan: problems with transabdominal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:292–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite JM, Economides DL. Acceptability by patients of transvaginal sonography in the elective assessment of the first-trimester fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:91–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erasmus I, Nicolaou E, van Gelderen CJ, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks’ gestation–relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history in South African women. S Afr Med J 2005;95:691–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis D, Pelham JJ, Done E, Sawhney H, Talucci M, Berghella V. Uterine contractions in asymptomatic pregnant women with a short cervix on ultrasound. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;18:325–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Iams JD, Newman RB, Macpherson C, Goldenberg RL, Mueller-Heubach E, Caritis SN, Dombrowski MP; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Frequency of uterine contractions in asymptomatic pregnant women with or without a short cervix on transvaginal ultrasound scan. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1253–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonek J, Blumenfeld M, Foley M, Johnson F, Iams J. Cervical length may change during ultrasonographic examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1355–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londero AP, Bertozzi S, Fruscalzo A, Driul L, Marchesoni D. Ultrasonographic assessment of cervix size and its correlation with female characteristics, pregnancy, BMI, and other anthropometric features. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;283:545–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH. Dynamic cervical length changes: preliminary observations from 30-minute transvaginal ultrasound recordings. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007;20:481–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppert P.. Cervical softening,effacement and dilatation: A complex biochemical cascade J Matern Fetal Med 2011;1:213–23.
   Google Scholar
• Stys SJ, Clewell WH, Meschia G. Changes in cervical compliance at parturition independent of uterine activity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;130:414–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ. The accuracy of digital examination and ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical length. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:214–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentin L, Bergelin I. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:256–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell T, Cairns M, Leslie J. Reliability and validity of two methods of three-dimensional cervical volume measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:49–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinoza J, Gonçalves LF, Romero R, Nien JK, Stites S, Kim YM, Hassan S, et al. The prevalence and clinical significance of amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:346–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusanovic JP, Espinoza J, Romero R, Gonçalves LF, Nien JK, Soto E, Khalek Net al. Clinical significance of the presence of amniotic fluid ‘sludge’ in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:706–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar