Predicting pH at birth in pregnancies with abnormal pulsatility index and positive end-diastolic velocity in the umbilical artery

References

• Farine D, Ryan G, Kelly EN, Morrow RJ, Laskin C, Ritchie JW. Absent end-diastolic flow velocity waveforms in the umbilical artery–the subsequent pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:637–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochelson B, Schulman H, Farmakides G, Bracero L, Ducey J, Fleischer A, Penny B, Winter D. The significance of absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery velocity waveforms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:1213–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabin B, Siebert M, Jimenez E, Saling E. Obstetrical characteristics of a loss of end-diastolic velocities in the fetal aorta and/or umbilical artery using Doppler ultrasound. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1988;25:173–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baschat AA, Cosmi E, Bilardo CM, Wolf H, Berg C, Rigano S, Germer U et al. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:253–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsdorp VH, van Vugt JM, van Geijn HP, Kostense PJ, Arduini D, Montenegro N, Todros T. Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet 1994;344:1664–1668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baschat AA, Gembruch U, Harman CR. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:571–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vintzileos AM, Fleming AD, Scorza WE, Wolf EJ, Balducci J, Campbell WA, Rodis JF. Relationship between fetal biophysical activities and umbilical cord blood gas values. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:707–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arduini D, Rizzo G. Normal values of Pulsatility Index from fetal vessels: a cross-sectional study on 1556 healthy fetuses. J Perinat Med 1990;18:165–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan KH, Smyth R.. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;1:CD002963.
   Google Scholar
• Francisco RP, Miyadahira S, Zugaib M. Predicting pH at birth in absent or reversed end-diastolic velocity in the umbilical arteries. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1042–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijxhoorn MJ, Visser GH, Huisjes HJ, Fidler V, Touwen BC. The relation between umbilical pH values and neonatal neurological morbidity in full term appropriate-for-dates infants. Early Hum Dev 1985;11:33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blechner JN. Maternal-fetal acid-base physiology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;36:3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruth VJ, Raivio KO. Perinatal brain damage: predictive value of metabolic acidosis and the Apgar score. BMJ 1988;297:24–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberry M, Soothill P. Management of fetal growth restriction. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007;92:F62–F67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecher K, Bilardo CM, Stigter RH, Ville Y, Hackelöer BJ, Kok HJ, Senat MV, Visser GH. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:564–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrazzi E, Bozzo M, Rigano S, Bellotti M, Morabito A, Pardi G, Battaglia FC, Galan HL. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:140–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmi E, Ambrosini G, D’Antona D, Saccardi C, Mari G. Doppler, cardiotocography, and biophysical profile changes in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1240–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan OM, Turan S, Gungor S, Berg C, Moyano D, Gembruch U, Nicolaides KH et al. Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:160–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mari G, Deter RL. Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in normal and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1262–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghidini A. Doppler of the ductus venosus in severe preterm fetal growth restriction: a test in search of a purpose? Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:250–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kähler C, Schleussner E, Möller A, Seewald HJ. Doppler measurements in fetoplacental vessels after maternal betamethasone administration. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004;19:52–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozaki AM, Francisco RP, Fonseca ES, Miyadahira S, Zugaib M. Fetal hemodynamic changes following maternal betamethasone administration in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction and absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:350–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baschat AA, Galan HL, Bhide A, Berg C, Kush ML, Oepkes D, Thilaganathan B et al. Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur S, Picconi JL, Chadha R, Kruger M, Mari G. Biophysical profile in the treatment of intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses who weigh <1000 g. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:264.e1–264.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Gupta LM, Hendrix NW, Berghella V; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:409.e1–409.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattison N, McCowan L.. Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD001068.
   Google Scholar