523
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparison of five classification systems for interpreting electronic fetal monitoring in predicting neonatal status at birth

, , , , &
Pages 487-490 | Received 23 Aug 2012, Accepted 25 Sep 2012, Published online: 06 Nov 2012

References

  • MacDonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Pereira M, Boylan P, Chalmers T. The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152:425–539.
  • Boylan P. Intrapartum fetal monitoring. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1987;1:73–95.
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2001). The use of electronic fetal monitoring: The use and interpretation of cardiotocography in intrapartum fetal surveillance. Evidence-based clinical guideline number 8. Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. London, U.K.: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press.
  • Liston R, Sawchuck D, Young D; Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada; British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:S3–56.
  • Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:661–666.
  • Parer JT, Ikeda T. A framework for standardized management of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:26.e1–26.e6.
  • Fleiss JL. The measurement of interrater agreement. In: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1981. pp 212–236.
  • ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:192–202.
  • Freeman RK, Nageotte MP. Comments on American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin no. 106. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:411–412.
  • Bannerman CG, Grobman WA, Antoniewicz L, Hutchinson M, Blackwell S. Assessment of the concordance among 2-tier, 3-tier, and 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:288.e1–288.e4.
  • Coletta J, Murphy E, Rubeo Z, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. The 5-tier system of assessing fetal heart rate tracings is superior to the 3-tier system in identifying fetal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:226.e1–226.e5.
  • ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. Umbilical cord blood gas and acid-base analysis (ACOG Committee Opinion No. 348). Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1319–1322.
  • Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. Short-term fetal heart rate variation, decelerations, and umbilical flow velocity waveforms before labor. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:673–678.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.