References
- Chauhan SP, Berghella V, Sanderson M, et al. Randomized clinical trials behind level A recommendations in obstetric practice bulletins; compliance with CONSORT statement. Am J Perinatol 2009;26:69–80
- Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354:1896–900
- Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:e1–34
- Consultants for the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1 January 2005–31 December 2005. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:e49–e63
- Editorial consultants. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1165–457
- Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV. The art of peer-reviewing an original research paper. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29:513–18
- Villar J, Carroli G, Belizan JM. Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Lancet 1995;345:772–6
- LeLorier J, Grégoire G, Benhaddad A, et al. Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 1997;337:536–42
- Vas J, Aranda JM, Nishishinya B, et al. Correction of nonvertex presentation with moxibustion: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:241–59
- Guittier MJ, Pichon M, Dong H, et al. Moxibustion for breech version: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1034–40
- Klein MC. The tyranny of meta-analysis and the misuse of randomized controlled trials in maternity care. Birth 2012;39:80–2
- Fowler FJ. Survey research methods. Applied social research methods series. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2009:49–67