“After birth” abortion: a biomedical and conceptual nonsense

References

• Giubilini A, Minerva F. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? J Med Ethics 2012;[E-pub ahead of print: Doi:1136/medethics-2011-100411]
   Google Scholar
• Selgelid MJ. After-birth abortion. Monash Bioeth Rev 2012;30:1–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuhse H. Some comments on the paper ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live'? Monash Bioeth Rev 2012;30:44–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biegler P. Public distress as a moral consideration in after-birth abortion. Monash Bioeth Rev 2012;30:48–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oakley J. ‘After-birth abortion' and arguments from potential. Monash Bioeth Rev 2012;30:58–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ainsworth S. Killing babies. Br J Health Care Manag 2012;18:181
   Google Scholar
• Hauskeller M. Reflections from a troubled stream: giubilini and Minerva on “after-birth abortion”. Hastings Center Rep 2012;42:17–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camosy CC. Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva. J Med Ethics 2012;[E-pub ahead of print: Doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100411]
   Google Scholar
• Consulta di Bioetica (Milan, Italy) Comunicato stampa: lettera ad Avvenire in Difesa della Libertà di Ricerca [Press Release: letter to “Avvenire” in defence of freedom of research] 23 March 2012. Available from: http://www.consultadibioetica.org/news/?id=132
   Google Scholar
• Mori. M. In difesa di Giubilini e Minerva (In defence of Giubilini & Minerva) L'Unità 3 march 2012
   Google Scholar
• Giubilini A, Minerva F. Defending after-birth abortion: responses to some critics. Monash Bioeth Rev 2012;30:49–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tooley M. Abortion and infanticide. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1983
   Google Scholar
• Singer P. Practical ethics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Collins English Dictionary. Complete and unabridged. London: Harper Collins Publishers. 2010
   Google Scholar
• Boland R. Second trimester abortion laws globally: actuality, trends and recommendations. Reprod Health Matters 2010;18:67–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benagiano G, Mori M, Ford N, Grudzinskas G. Early pregnancy wastage: ethical considerations. Reprod BioMed Online 2011;22:692–700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landeweerd L. Reconstructing the self: issues of choice, fate and justification in the eugenics debate [doctoral dissertation]. Maastricht: Datawyse; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Ballotpedia. “Mississippi: life begins at the moment of fertilization”. Amendment, Initiative 26 (2011). Available from: http://www.ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Mississippi_Life_Begins_at_the_Moment_of_Fertilization_amendment,_Initiative_26_(2011) [last accessed 20 Jan 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Benagiano G, Farris M, Grudzinskas G. The fate of fertilised human oocytes. Reprod BioMed Online 2010;21:732–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford NM. The prenatal person. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Ross WD. The generation of animals. “The works of Aristotle” translated into english (translation by Arthur Platt). Vol. V. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1912 (reprinted):735--6
   Google Scholar
• Sen AK. Missing women. Brit Med J 1992;304:586–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen AK. Editorial. Missing women-revisited. Brit Med J 2003;327:1297–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathalla MF. The one hundred million missing females are dead: let it happen never again. Internat J Gynecol Obstet 1994;46:101–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathalla MF. Women’s health: an overview. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1994;46:105–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberstadt N. Global war against baby girls. The New Atlantis 2011;3:3–18
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Division World Population Prospects. 2010 Revision. File 4. Sex ratio by major area, region and country, 1950–2010 (males per 100 females). Available from: http://www.Esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/excel-data/population.htm [last accessed 03 Dec 2012]
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau’s International Programs Center (IPC). 2012. International Data Base. Avilable from: http://www.census.gov/population/international/data/idb/informationGateway.php [last accessed 20 Dec 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Hesketh, T, Xing, ZW. Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2006;103:13271–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junhong, C. Prenatal sex determination and sex-selective abortion in rural central China. Pop Develop Rev 2001;27:259–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesketh, T. Selecting sex: the effect of preferring sons. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2012;67:152–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin TC. The decline of son preference and rise of gender indifference in Taiwan since 1990. Dem Res 1990;20:377–402
   Google Scholar
• Chung WJ, Das Gupta M. Why is son preference declining in South Korea? The role of development and public policy, and the implications for China and India. The World Bank Development Research Group. Human Development and Public Services Team, October 2007. Policy Research Working Paper 4373. Available from: http://www.unfpa.org/gender/docs/sexselection/indiapublishedpapers/UNFPA_Publication-39869.pdf [last accessed 17 Jan 2013]
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Preventing gender-biased sex selection: an interagency statement OHCHR, UNFPA, UNICEF, UN Women and WHO. Geneva: World Health Organisation: Geneva; 2011
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Information Network (POPIN) – UN Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, with support from the UN Population Fund (UNFPA). Report of the international conference on population and development (Cairo, 5–13 September 1994). Document A/CONF.171/13: Report of the ICPD (94/10/18). New York: United Nations; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Williams J. Sex-selective abortion: a matter of choice. Law Philos. 2012;31:125–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petition: Stop gendercide now: the lethal bias against baby girls. Available from: http://www.stopgendercidenow.com/ [last accessed 25 Jan 2013]
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1989. Convention on the rights of the Child. Available from: http://www.unicef.org/crc/ [last accessed 20 Dec 2012]
   Google Scholar