Alteration of vascularization in preeclamptic placentas measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound

References

• Matijevic R, Kurjak A. The assessment of placental blood vessels by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. J Perinat Med 2002;30:26–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu CH, Chang CH, Ko HC, et al. Assessment of placental fractional moving blood volume using quantitative three-dimensional power doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:19–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin JM, Bude RO, Carson PL, et al. Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US. Radiology 1994;190:853–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pairleitner H, Steiner H, Hasenoehrl G, Staudach A. Three-dimensional power Doppler sonography: imaging and quantifying blood flow and vascularization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:139–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinzler WL, Vintzileos AM. Fetal growth restriction: a modern approach. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2008;20:125–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Nicolaides KH. The role of uterine artery Doppler in predicting adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004;18:383–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain N, Paidas MJ. Adverse pregnancy outcome, the uteroplacental interface, and preventive strategies. Semin Perinatol 2007;31:208–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiot C, Gaglioti P, Oberto M, et al. Is three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound useful in the assessment of placental perfusion in normal and growth-restricted pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:171–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi J, Hata K, Tanaka H, Hata T. Placental vascular sonobiopsy using three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in normal and growth restricted fetuses. Placenta 2009;30:391–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon BH, Lee CM, Kim SW. An abnormal umbilical artery waveform: a strong and independent predictor of adverse perinatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:713–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdom JC, Burrell SJ, Kaufmann P. Pathology and clinical implications of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:271–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang KG, Chen CP, Yang JM, Su TH. Impact of reverse end-diastolic flow velocity in umbilical artery on pregnancy outcome after the 28th gestational week. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;77:527–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Gyte GM. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;20:CD007529
   Google Scholar
• Report of the national high blood pressure education program working group on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:S1–S22
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh TT, Hsu JJ, Chen CJ, et al. Analysis of birth weight and gestational age in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 1991;90:382–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soothill PW, Ajayi RA, Campbell S, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of morbidity in small and normally grown fetuses by fetal heart rate variability, biophysical profile score and umbilical artery Doppler studies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:742–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chien PF, Owen P, Khan KS. Validity of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:856–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2010;376:631–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merce LT, Barco MJ, Bau S, et al. Assessment of placental vascularization by three-dimensional power Doppler “vascular biopsy” in normal pregnancies. Croat Med J 2005;46:765–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuuli MG, Houser M, Odibo L, et al. Validation of placental vascular sonobiopsy for obtaining representative placental vascular indices by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography. Placenta 2010;31:192–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Paula CF, Ruano R, Campos JA, Zugaib M. Quantitative analysis of placental vasculature by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography in normal pregnancies from 12 to 40 weeks of gestation. Placenta 2009;30:142–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalud I, Shaha S. Evaluation of the utero-placental circulation by three-dimensional Doppler ultrasound in the second trimester of normal pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007;20:299–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thame M, Osmond C, Wilks R, et al. Second-trimester placental volume and infant size at birth. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:279–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hafner E, Metzenbauer M, Höfinger D, et al. Placental growth from the first to the second trimester of pregnancy in SGA-foetuses and pre-eclamptic pregnancies compared to normal foetuses. Placenta 2003;24:336–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozkurt N, Basgul Yigiter A, Gokaslan H, Kavak ZN. Correlations of fetal–maternal outcomes and first trimester 3-D placental volume/3-D power Doppler calculations. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2010;37:26–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guimarães Filho HA, Araujo Júnior E, Mattar R, et al. Placental blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound at 26 to 35 weeks gestation in normal pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:69–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa J, Rice H, Cardwell C, et al. An assessment of vascularity and flow intensity of the placenta in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia using three-dimensional ultrasound. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:894–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomorski M, Zimmer M, Florjanski J, et al. Comparative analysis of placental vasculature and placental volume in normal and IUGR pregnancies with the use of three-dimensional power Doppler. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;285:331–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar