Determinants affecting pregnant women’s utilization of prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a review of the literature

References

• Gezondheidsraad. Wet bevolkingsonderzoek: prenatale screening op downsyndroom en neurale buisdefecten(Health Counsil of The Netherlands Population Screening Act: Prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome and neural tube defects); 2007. Report no. 2007/05WBO
   Google Scholar
• Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect 2001;4:99–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ekelund CK, Andersen HJ, Christensen J, et al. Down’s syndrome risk assessment in Denmark–secondary publication. Ugeskr Laeger 2010;172:1759–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ekelund CK, Jorgensen FS, Petersen OB, et al. Danish Fetal Medicine Research Group. Impact of a new national screening policy for Down’s syndrome in Denmark: population based cohort study. Br Med J 2008;337:a2547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelund CK, Petersen OB, Skibsted L, et al. First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in Denmark: implications for detection and birth rates of trisomy 18 and trisomy 13. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:140–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward P. Down’s syndrome screening in England. Committee UNS 2011
   Google Scholar
• Schielen PC. Quality control parameters of the Dutch Down syndrome screening Laboratories 2010 National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Diagnostic Laboratory for Infectious Diseases and Perinatal Screening The Netherlands; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Boyd PA, Devigan C, Khoshnood B, et al. Survey of prenatal screening policies in Europe for structural malformations and chromosome anomalies, and their impact on detection and termination rates for neural tube defects and Down’s syndrome. BJOG 2008;115:689–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Heuvel A, Chitty L, Dormandy E, et al. Is informed choice in prenatal testing universally valued? A population-based survey in Europe and Asia. BJOG 2009;116:880–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Heuvel A, Chitty L, Dormandy E, et al. Informed choice in prenatal testing: a survey among obstetricians and gynaecologists in Europe and Asia. Prenat Diagn 2008;28:1238–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall S, Chitty L, Dormandy E, et al. Undergoing prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome: presentation of choice and information in Europe and Asia. Eur J Hum Genet 2007;15:563–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995;36:1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts KA, Dixon-Woods M, Fitzpatrick R, et al. Factors affecting uptake of childhood immunisation: a Bayesian synthesis of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Lancet 2002;360:1596–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Choosing a mixed methods design. In: Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed, Chapter 3. Thousand Oaks: SAGE publications; 2011:104
   Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Harden A, Oakley A, et al. Integrating qualitative research with trials in systematic reviews. Br Med J 2004;328:1010–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams C, Sandall J, Lewando-Hundt G, et al. Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:1983–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant LD, Green JM, Hewison J. The role of attitudes towards the targets of behaviour in predicting and informing prenatal testing choices. Psychol Health 2009;25:1175–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredsdottir H, Bjornsdottir K, Sandall J. How do prospective parents who decline prenatal screening account for their decision? A qualitative study. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:274–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santalahti P, Hemminki E, Latikka AM, Ryynanen M. Women’s decision-making in prenatal screening. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:1067–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia E, Timmermans DR, van Leeuwen E. The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:753–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia E, Timmermans DRM, Van Leeuwen E. Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making. Prenat Diagn 2008;28:115–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg M, Timmermans DR, Kleinveld JH, et al. Accepting or declining the offer of prenatal screening for congenital defects: test uptake and women’s reasons. Prenat Diagn 2005;25:84–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etchegary H, Potter B, Howley H, et al. The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions. Genet Test 2008;12:115–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carroll JC, Brown JB, Reid AJ, Pugh P. Women’s experience of maternal serum screening. Can Fam Physician 2000;46:614–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredsdottir H, Sandall J, Bjornsdottir K. ‘This is just what you do when you are pregnant’: a qualitative study of prospective parents in Iceland who accept nuchal translucency screening. Midwifery 2009;25:711–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid B, Sinclair M, Barr O, et al. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women’s decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:1561–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg M, Timmermans DR, Kleinveld JH, et al. Are counsellors’ attitudes influencing pregnant women’s attitudes and decisions on prenatal screening? Prenat Diagn 2007;27:518–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker M, Birnie E, Pajkrt E, et al. Low uptake of the combined test in the Netherlands - which factors contribute? Prenat Diagn 2012;32:1305–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Dormandy E, Marteau TM. The multi-dimensional measure of informed choice: a validation study. Patient Educ Couns 2002;48:87–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Jacques S, Grenier S, Charland M, et al. Decisional needs assessment regarding Down syndrome prenatal testing: a systematic review of the perceptions of women, their partners and health professionals. Prenat Diagn 2008;28:1183–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar