References
- Zeitlin J, Blondel B, Alexander S, Breart G. Variation in rates of postterm birth in Europe: reality or artefact? BJOG 2007;114:1097–103
- Olesen AW, Westergaard JG, Olsen J. Perinatal and maternal complications related to postterm delivery: a national register based study, 1978–1996. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:222–7
- Caughey AB, Washington AE, Laros RK Jr. Neonatal complications of term pregnancy: rates by gestational age increase in a continuous, not threshold, fashion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:185–90
- Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;4:CD004945
- Sanchez-Ramos L, Olivier F, Delke I, Kaunitz AM. Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:1312–18
- Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellman J, et al. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian Multicenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1587–92
- Caughey AB, Musci TJ. Complications of term pregnancies beyond 37 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:57–62
- Wennerholm UB, Hagberg H, Brorsson B, Bergh C. Induction of labor versus expectant management for post-date pregnancy: is there sufficient evidence for a change in clinical pracitice? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:6-17
- Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:917–22
- Heimstad R, Romundstad PR, Hyett J, et al. Women’s experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labor for post-term pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:950–6
- Rayburn WF, Zhang J. Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:164–7
- Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:628–33
- Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:600–7
- Prysak M, Castronova FC. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a case-control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:47–52
- Macer JA, Macer CL, Chan LS. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1690–7
- Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ. Risk of caesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1565–72
- Cole RA, Howie PW, MacNaughton MC. Elective induction of labor: A randomized prospective trial. Lancet 1975;1979:767–70
- Tylleskar J, Finnstrom O, Leijon I, et al. Spontaneous labor and elective induction – a prospective randomized study. I. Effects on mother and fetus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979;58:513–18
- Amano K, Saito K, Shoda T, et al. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation: a prospective randomized trial. J Obstet Gynecol Res 1999;25:33–7
- Nielsen PE, Howard BC, Hill CC, et al. Comparison of elective induction of labor with favourable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial. J Mat Fet Neonat Med 2005;18:59–64
- Heimstad R, Skogvoll E, Mattson LA, et al. Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:609–17