Twin pregnancy in patients with a uterine anomaly

References

• Simón C, Martinez L, Pardo F, et al. Müllerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 1991;56:1192–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, et al. Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2277–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, et al. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:161–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, et al. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:761–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acién P. Incidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1372–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, et al. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:371–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichman D, Laufer MR, Robinson BK. Pregnancy outcomes in unicornuate uteri: a review. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1886–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludmir J, Samuels P, Brooks S, Mennuti MT. Pregnancy outcome of patients with uncorrected uterine anomalies managed in a high-risk obstetric setting. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:906–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, et al. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001;7:161–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980–2009. NCHS data brief, no 80. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Sugaya S. Twin pregnancy after in vitro fertilization in a woman with a unicornuate uterus. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2010;37:317–8
   Google Scholar
• Nahra-Lynch M, Toffle RC. Multiple gestation in a unicornuate uterus. A case report. J Reprod Med 1997;42:451–4
   Google Scholar
• Check JH, Lee G, Nowroozi K, Baker A. Successful delivery of twins in a woman with a unicornuate uterus. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1992;34:124–5
   Google Scholar
• Aruh I, Aslan D, Karaarslan F, et al. Twin pregnancy in the horns of a bicornuate uterus after in vitro fertilization and split embryo transfer: a case report. J Reprod Med 2005;50:213–5
   Google Scholar
• Weissman A, Eldar I, Malinger G, et al. Successful twin pregnancy in a patient with complete uterine septum corrected during cesarean section. Fertil Steril 2006;85:494.e11–4
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad FK, Sherman SJ, Hagglund KH. Twin gestation in a woman with a uterus didelphys. A case report. J Reprod Med 2000;45:357–9
   Google Scholar
• Barmat LI, Damario MA, Kowalik A, et al. Twin gestation occupying separate horns of a bicornuate uterus after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2316–8
   Google Scholar
• Brown O. Twin pregnancy in a uterus didelphys, with unilateral placental abruption and onset of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;39:506–8
   Google Scholar
• Kekkonen R, Nuutila M, Laatikainen T. Twin pregnancy with a fetus in each half of a uterus didelphys. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991;70:373–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohara M, Nakayama M, Masamoto H, et al. Twin pregnancy in each half of a uterus didelphys with a delivery interval of 66 days. BJOG 2003;110:331–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora M, Gupta N, Neelam, Jindal S. Unique case of successful twin pregnancy after spontaneous conception in a patient with uterus bicornis unicollis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007;276:193–5
   Google Scholar
• Kuczynski AW, Szcześniak W, Szczygielski A. A case of successful twin pregnancy placed in separate horns of bicornuate, unicollis uterus. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1998;47:201–4
   Google Scholar
• Narlawar RS, Chavhan GB, Bhatgadde VL, Shah JR. Twin gestation in one horn of a bicornuate uterus. J Clin Ultrasound 2003;31:167–9
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin 56. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2004
   Google Scholar
• The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 1988;49:944–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oken E, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards J, Gillman MW. A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatr 2003;3:6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garite TJ, Clark RH, Elliott JP, Thorp JA. Twins and triplets: the effect of plurality and growth on neonatal outcome compared with singleton infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:700–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollier LM, McINtire DD, Leveno KJ. Outcome of twin pregnancies according to intrapair birth weight differences. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:1006–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary-Goldman J, D'Alton ME. Growth abnormalities and multiple gestations. Semin Perinatol 2008;32:206–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: diagnosis and management of preeclampsia. ACOG Practice Bulletin 33. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Fox NS, Rebarber A, Dunham S, Saltzman DH. Outcomes of multiple gestations with advanced maternal age. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:593–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo L, Arduino S, Febo G, et al. Cervical Cerclage for malformed uterus. Clin Exp Obstetr Gynecol 1997;24:104–6
   Google Scholar
• Roman AS, Rebarber A, Pereira L, et al. The efficacy of sonographically indicated cerclage in multiple gestations. J Ultrasound Med 2005;24:763–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar