References
- Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2175–84
- Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher AJ, et al. Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:976–85
- Hillman SC, Pretlove S, Coomarasamy A, et al. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:6–14
- Hillman SC, McMullan DJ, Hall G, et al. Prenatal chromosomal microarray use: a prospective cohort study of fetuses and a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:610–20
- Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, et al. A working group of the american college of medical genetics ACMG laboratory quality assurance commitee. American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variation. Genet Med 2011;13:680–85
- Bernhardt BA, Soucier D, Hanson K, et al. Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results. Genet Med 2013;15:139–45
- Kleeman L, Bianchi DW, Shaffer LG, et al. Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:1213–17
- Maya I, Davidov B, Gershovitz L, et al. Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting. Prenat Diagn 2010;30:1131–37
- Coppinger J, Alliman S, Lamb AN, et al. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:1156–66
- D'Amours G, Kibar Z, Mathonnet G, et al. Whole-genome array CGH identifies pathogenic copy number variations in fetuses with major malformations and a normal karyotype. Clin Genet 2012;81:128–41
- Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Rosenfeld JA, et al. Referral patterns for microarray testing in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:611
- Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, et al. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:D561–68
- Connacher AA, Forsyth CC, Stewart WK. Orofaciodigital syndrome type I associated with polycystic kidneys and agenesis of the corpus callosum. J Med Genet 1987;24:116–18
- Flynn M, Zou YS, Milunsky A. Whole gene duplication of the PQBP1 gene in syndrome resembling Renpenning. Am J Med Genet A 2011;155:141–44
- Palumbo O, Palumbo P, Palladino T, et al. An emerging phenotype of interstitial 15q25.2 microdeletions: clinical report and review. Am J Med Genet A 2012;158:3182–89
- Hillman SC, Skelton J, Quinlan-Jones E, et al. “If it helps …” the use of microarray technology in prenatal testing: Patient and partners reflections. Am J Med Genet A 2013;161:1619–27