Influence of an education program of pregnant women on delivery

References

• WHO. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:437–8
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Technical Working Group, World Health Organization. Birth 1997;24:121–3
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Social Policy. Clinical practice guidelines on normal childbirth care. 1st ed. Vitoria: Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Wagner M. Fish can't see water: the need to humanize birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001;75:S25–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr M, Riesco ML. Rekindling of nurse-midwifery in Brazil: public policy and childbirth trends. J Midwifery Womens Health 2007;52:406–11
   Google Scholar
• Behruzi R, Hatem M, Fraser W, et al. Facilitators and barriers in the humanization of childbirth practice in Japan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010;27:25
   Google Scholar
• Artieta-Pinedo I, Paz-Pascual C, Grandes G, et al. The benefits of antenatal education for the childbirth process in Spain. Nurs Res 2010;59:194–202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consonni EB, Calderon IM, Consonni M, et al. A multidisciplinary program of preparation for childbirth and motherhood: maternal anxiety and perinatal outcomes. Reprod Health 2010;29:28 . doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-7-28
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli A, Baglio G, Donati S, et al. Do antenatal classes benefit the mother and her baby? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003;13:94–101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gagnon AJ, Sandall J. Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;18:CD002869
   Google Scholar
• Fabian HM, Radestad IJ, Waldesnström U. Childbirth and parenthood education classes in Sweden. 2005. Women's opinion and possible outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:436–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroto-Navarro G, García-Calvente MM, Mateo-Rodríguez I. The challenge of maternity in Spain: social and health difficulties. Gac Sanit 2004;18:13–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Junta de Andalucía. Regional Department of Health. Integrated assistencial process of pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium. 2nd ed. Seville: Andalusian Department of Health; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Márquez García A, Pozo Muñoz F, Sierra Ruiz M, et al. Profile of pregnant women who do not go to a maternal education program. Med Fam (And) 2001;2. Available from: http://www.samfyc.es/Revista/PDF/v2n3/original5.pdf [last accessed 23 May 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Goberna I Tricas J, García Riesco P, Gálvez Ladó M. Evaluation of the quality of prenatal care. Aten Primaria 1996;18:75–6
   Google Scholar
• Tajada N, Bernués, A, López F, et al. Prenatal health education: characteristics of participation in a health area. Enferm Científ 1991;116:4–6
   Google Scholar
• Pina F, Martínez ME, Rojas P, et al. The planning and maternal education favors the development of labor. Enferm Clín 1994;4:209–15
   Google Scholar
• Molina Salmerón M, MartínezGarcía AM, MartínezGarcía FJ, et al. Impact of maternal education: maternal subjective experience and evolution of the birth. Enferm Univ Albacete 1996;6:20–9
   Google Scholar
• Bergström M, Kieler H, Waldenström U. Effects of natural childbirth preparation versus standard antenatal education on epidural rates, experience of childbirth and parental stress in mothers and fathers: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. BJOG 2009;116:1167–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves Monteiro MA, Lima Tavares TJ. The group practice of pregnant women in the effectiveness of the humanization of birth. Rev RENE 2004;5:73–8
   Google Scholar
• Kim HH, Nava-Ocampo AA, Kim SK, et al. Is prenatal childbirth preparation effective in decreasing adverse maternal and neonatal response to labor? A nested case-control study. Acta Biomed 2008;79:18–22
   Google Scholar
• Reyes Hoyos LM. Psychoprofilaxis benefits associated obstetric maternal perinatal in primiparous attended at the National Institute Maternal Perinatal January-December 2002 [thesis]. Lima (Peru) 2004. Available from: http://www.cybertesis.edu.pe/sisbib/2004/reyes_hl/html/index-frames.html [last accessed 30 Dec 2010]
   Google Scholar
• Moore ER, Anderson GC, Bergman N, Dowswell T. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;5:CD003519 . doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003519.pub3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago Alvarado A, Vidal Polo P. Factors associated with active participation in the delivery room of the mother with obstetrical psychoprofilaxis [thesis]. Lima (Perú) 2004. Available from: http://www.cybertesis.edu.pe/sisbib/2004/vidal_pp/html/sdx/vidal_pp-TH.7.html [last accessed 1 Jan 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Araneda H, Cabrera C, Cabrera J, et al. Prenatal education and its relation to the mode of delivery: a route to natural childbirth. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2006;71:98–103
   Google Scholar
• Simpson KR, Newman G, Chirino OR. Patient education to reduce elective labor inductions. Am J Matern Child Nurs 2012;35:188–94; quiz 195–6
   Google Scholar
• Bastani F, Hidarnia A, Montgomery KS, et al. Does relaxation education in anxious primigravid Iranian women influence adverse pregnancy outcomes?: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2006;20:138–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh A, Roosta F, Chaichian S, Alaghehbandan R. Evaluation of the impact of birth preparation courses on the health of the mother and the newborn. Am J Perinatol 2005;22:7–9
   Google Scholar
• Khunpradit S, Tavender E, Lumbiganon P, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;15:CD005528 . doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Avila Fabián AC. Vulvoperineal trauma and their risk factors in pregnant women at the Hospital Santa Rosa, during the months of January to June 2 [thesis]. Lima (Peru) 2004. Available from: http://www.cybertesis.edu.pe/sisbib/2004/avila_fa/pdf/avila_fa.pdf [last accessed 02 Jan 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Herrera B, Gálvez A. Selective episiotomy: a change in practice based on the evidence. Prog Obstet Ginecol 2004;47:414–22
   Google Scholar
• da Silva FM, de Oliveira SM, Bick D, et al. Risk factors for birth-related perineal trauma: a cross-sectional study in a birth centre. J Clin Nurs 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04133.x. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar