References
- Italian Supreme Court, http://www.cortedicassazione.it/
- Fanos A, Tagliabue P, Greco L, et al. Neonatal malpractice claims in Italy: how big is the problem and which are the causes? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:493–97
- Cascardo D. The medical malpractice crisis: what is the cause? Is there a cure? J Med Pract Manage 2007;22:283–6
- Fisher-Jeffes L, Barton C, Finlay F. Clinicians' knowledge of informed consent. J Med Ethics 2007;33:181–4
- Jackson A. Wrongful life and wrongful birth. The English conception. J Legal Med 1996;17:349–81
- Muriithi PM. Does the rejection of wrongful life claims rely on a conceptual error? J Med Ethics 2011;37:433–44
- Italian Supreme Court, Section III, Judgement n. 1674, October, 2, 2012
- Whitney DW, Rosenbaum KN. Recovery of damages for wrongful birth. J Leg Med 2011;32:167–204
- Amagwula T, Chang PL, Hossain A, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a systematic review of litigation in the face of new technology. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1277–82
- Hunt LM, de Voogd KB, Castañeda H. The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making? Patient Edu Couns 2005;56:302–12
- Stapleton H, Kirkham M, Thomas G. Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. Br Med J 2002;324:639--43
- Mujezinovic F, Alfirevic Z. Procedure-related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:687–94
- Ekelund CK, Jørgensen FS, Petersen OB, et al. Impact of a new National screening policy for Down’s syndrome in Denmark: population based cohort study. Br Med J 2008;337:a2547--54
- Italian Society of Prenatal Diagnosis and Maternal Fetal Medicine: Guidelines on Investigations in Prenatal Diagnosis, Rome, December 2006
- Italian Institute of Health, Ceveas: Guidelines on the Normal Pregnancy, Rome, September 2011
- Green JM, Hewison J, Bekker HL, et al. Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2004;8:1–109
- European Court of Human Rights, Vo France (2004) ECHR 326, n.84
- Cour de cassation de France. Assemblée plénière. Arrêt du 17 novembre 2000
- Loi 2002-303 du 4 mars 2002 relative aux droits des malades et à la qualityé du système de santé [Law 2002-303 of March 4, 2002 on Patients' Rights and Quality of the Health System], JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE LA REPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE [J.O.] [OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF FRANCE], March 4, 2002, p. 4118
- European Court of Human Rights, Maurice v. France, October, 6 2005; French Supreme Cour de Cassation n.135; French Supreme Cour de Cassation n.195; French Supreme Cour de Cassation n.196
- Spanish Tribunal Supremo, n. 532, June 5, 1998; Spanish Tribunal Supremo Judgement n. 6580 June 30, 2006; Spanish Tribunal Supremo Judgement n. 837, July 6 2007; Spanish Tribunal Supremo Judgement n. 1197, November 23 2007
- Spanish Tribunal Supremo Judgement n. 1184 18 December 2003
- Spanish Tribunal Supremo Judgement n. 5716, June 16, 2010
- Hafner E. ‘Wrongful birth – a step in the right direction?’ Ultraschall in der Medizin 2011;32:107–8
- Crockin SL. Ethics, legal, social, counselling reproduction, genetics and the law. RBM Online 2005;10:692–704