References
- Schröder J. Transplacental passage of blood cells. J Med Genet 1975;12:230–42
- Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, et al. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet 1997;350:485–7
- Lo YMD, Chiu RWK. Prenatal diagnosis: progress through plasma nucleic acids. Nat Rev Genet 2007;8:71–7
- Lo YM, Hjelm NM, Fidler C, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal RhD status by molecular analysis of maternal plasma. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1734–8
- Finning K, Martin P, Summers J, et al. Effect of high throughput RHD typing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma on use of anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD negative pregnant women: prospective feasibility study. Br Med J 2008;336:816–18
- Costa JM, Benachi A, Gautier E. New strategy for prenatal diagnosis of X-linked disorders. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1502
- Giambona A, Makrydimas G, Leto F, et al. Feasibility of DNA diagnosis of haemoglobinopathies on coelocentesis. Br J Haematol 2011;153:268–72
- Novelli A, Grati FR, Ballarati L, et al. Microarray application in prenatal diagnosis: a position statement from the cytogenetics working group of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU), 2011. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:384–8
- Jurkovic D, Jauniaux E, Campbell S, et al. Coelocentesis: a new technique for early prenatal diagnosis. Lancet 1993;341:1623–4
- Chatzimeletiou K, Makrydimas G, Sotiriadis A, et al. Aneuploidy screening in coelomic samples using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Prenat Diagn 2005;25:919–26
- Jouannic JM, Tachdjian G, Costa JM, Bénifla JL. Coelomic fluid analysis: the absolute necessity to prove its fetal origin. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;16:148–51
- Tonni G, Ventura A, Bonasoni MP. Acrania/encephalocele sequence (exencephaly) associated with 92,XXXX karyotype: early prenatal diagnosis at 9(+5) weeks by 3D transvaginal ultrasound and coelocentesis. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2009;49:113–15
- Crüger DG, Bruun-Petersen G, Kølvraa S. Quantitative evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) signals in uncultured coelomic cells. Prenat Diagn 1997;17:635–42
- Jauniaux E, Cirigliano V, Adinolfi M. Very early prenatal diagnosis on coelomic cells using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction. Reprod Biomed Online 2003;6:494–8
- Makrydimas G, Georgiou I, Bouba I, et al. Early prenatal diagnosis by celocentesis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:482–5
- Jouannic JM, Costa JM, Ernault P, Bénifla JL. Very early prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases based on coelomic fluid analysis: a feasibility study. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2185–8
- Crüger DG, Bruun-Petersen G, Kølvraa S. Early prenatal diagnosis: standard cytogenetic analysis of coelomic cells obtained by coelocentesis. Prenat Diagn 1996;16:945–9
- Ballif BC, Rorem EA, Sundin K, et al. Detection of low-level mosaicism by array CGH in routine diagnostic specimens. Am J Med Genet A 2006;140:2757–67
- Neill NJ, Torchia BS, Bejjani BA, et al. Comparative analysis of copy number detection by whole-genome BAC and oligonucleotide array CGH. Mol Cytogenet 2010;29:3–11
- Bui TH, Vetro A, Zuffardi O, Shaffer LG. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is conventional chromosome analysis necessary in the post-array CGH era? Prenat Diagn 2011;31:235–43
- Coskun S, Alsmadi O. Whole genome amplification from a single cell: a new era for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2007;27:297–302
- Giardina E, Pietrangeli I, Martone C, et al. Whole genome amplification and real-time PCR in forensic casework. BMC Genomics 2009;10:159