References
- Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:290.e1–6
- Chauhan SP, Gupta LM, Hendrix NW, Berghella V. Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:409. e1
- Jacobsson B, Ahlin K, Francis A, et al. Cerebral palsy and restricted growth status at birth: population-based case-control study. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;115:1250–5
- M Kady S, Gardosi J. Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstetr Gynaecol 2004;18:397–410
- Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Green-Top Guidelines. The Investigation and management of the small-for-gestational- age fetus; 2002. Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk/guidelines [last accessed 26 Dec 2012]
- Marsál K, Persson PH, Larsen T, et al. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Paediatrica 1996;85:843–8
- Maulik D. Hemodynamic interpretation of the arterial Doppler waveform. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol 1993;3:219–27
- Platz E, Newman R. Diagnosis of IUGR: traditional biometry. Semin Perinatol 2008;32:140–7
- Berkley E, Chauhan SP, Abuhamad A. Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstetr Gynecol 2012;206:300–8
- Marconi AM, Ronzoni S, Vailati S, et al. Neonatal morbidity and mortality in intrauterine growth restricted (IUGR) pregnancies is predicated upon prenatal diagnosis of clinical severity. Reprod Sci 2009;16:373–9
- Thornton JG, Hornbuckle J, Vail A, et al. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the Growth Restriction Intervention Trial (GRIT): multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:513–20
- Roy A, Mukherjee S, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Perinatal outcome in pregnancies with intra-uterine growth restriction by using umbilical and middle cerebral artery colour Doppler. J Ind Med Assoc 2010;110:154–7, 163
- Anshul D, Neelu S, Suneeta G. Significance of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in the perinatal outcome of the growth restricted fetuses. J Obstetr Gynecol India 2010;60:38–43
- Malhotra N, Chanana C, Kumar S, et al. Comparison of perinatal outcome of growth-restricted fetuses with normal and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms. Ind J Med Sci 2006;60:311–17
- Trudinger BJ, Cook CM, Giles WB, et al. Fetal umbilical artery velocity waveforms and subsequent neonatal outcome. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 1991:98:378–84
- Soregaroli M, Bonera R, Danti L, et al. Prognostic role of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in growth-restricted fetuses. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002;11:199–203
- Jang DG, Jo YS, Lee SJ, et al. Perinatal outcomes and maternal clinical characteristics in IUGR with absent or reversed end-diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical artery. Arch Gynecol Obstetr 2011;284:73–8
- Karsdorp VHM, Van Vugt JMG, Van Geijn HP, et al. Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet 1994;344:1664–8