Pregnancy outcome after induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section

References

• Landon MB; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Eng J Med 2004;351:2581–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. Practice Bulletins Number 115 – vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery; August 2010
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Consensus Development Conference statement. NIH Consensus Development Conference; 2010; Bethesda (MD)
   Google Scholar
• Benbow A, Semple D, Maresh M. Effective procedures in maternity care suitable for audit. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 2006;30:235–41 (Level III)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YT, Mello MM, Subramanian SV, Studdert DM. Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section. Med Care 2009;47:234–42 (Level III)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009;57:1–104
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie BS, Bradley SM, Embrey MP. Vaginal prostaglandins and labour induction for patients previously delivered by caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;91:7–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jelínek J, Páral V, Roztocil A, et al. Control of labor with prostaglandins after previous cesarean section. Zentralbl Gynakol 1993;115:109–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider KT, Lüftner D, Rath W, Thurmayr GR. Labor induction with prostaglandin in post-cesarean section status. Zentralbl Gynakol 1994;116:461–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:332–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK. Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with a previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1176–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, et al. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in women with one prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:882–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345:3–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamm BL, Goings JR, Fuelberth N, et al. Oxytocin during labor after previous cesarean section: results of a multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:709–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stovall TG, Shaver DC, Solomon SK, Anderson GD. Trial of labor in previous cesarean section patients, excluding classical cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:713–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul RH, Phelan JP, Yeh S. Trial of labor in the patient with a prior cesarean birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:297–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lao TT, Leung BFH. Labor induction for planned vaginal delivery in patients with previous cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987;66:413–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1656–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Estimated perinatal and neonatal mortality global, regional and country estimates. Geneva: WHO; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:976–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielchinsky Y, Rojansky N, Fasouliotis SJ, Ezra Y. Placenta accreta – summary of 10 years: a survey of 310 cases. Placenta 2002; 23:210–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1016–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, et al. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:698–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1511–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:600–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glantz JC. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes. J Reprod Med 2005;50:235–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:262–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley P. Contra-indications to prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel: evidence based? J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 1996;18:1143–52
   Google Scholar
• Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Hendler I, et al. Modified Bishop's score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1644–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin KS, Dachauer JD, Doeden AL, Rayburn WF. Uterine rupture after use of a prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert during vaginal birth after cesarean: a report of two cases. J Reprod Med 1999;44:571–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Lahav E, et al. Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;116:173–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar