The effect of cerclage in twin gestations with short cervix: a Bayesian evaluation

References

• Goodman SN. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: the p value fallacy. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:995–1004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Carlin J, Stern H, Rubin D. Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman and Hall, CRC; 2004
   Google Scholar
• GRIT Study Group. A randomized trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 2003;110:27–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likis FE, Velez-Edwards DR, Andrews JC, et al. Progestogens for preterm birth prevention. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:897–907
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santolaya J, Faro R. Twins – twice more trouble? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012;55:296–306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honest H, Bachmann LM, Coomarasamy A, et al. Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:305–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zork N, Biggio J, Tita A, et al. Decreasing prematurity in twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:375–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Odibo A, To M, et al. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient based data. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:181–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Pract Bull 2012;Issue 31
   Google Scholar
• To M, Fonseca E, Molina F, Cacho ANK. Maternal characteristics and cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous early preterm delivery in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1360–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnwald C, Momirova V, Peaceman A, et al. Second trimester cervical length and risk of perterm birth in women with twin gestations treated with 17 alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010;23:1360–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman R, Kromback SMM, McGee D. Effect of cerclage on obstetrical outcome in twin gestations with a shortened cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:634–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Kuhlman K, Daly S, Berghella V. Prediction of preterm birth by second trimester cervical sonography in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:288–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Miodovnik M, et al. The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:1047–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehsanipoor RM, Haydon ML, Gaffaney CL, et al. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and preterm birth in twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;40:81–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berghella V, Odibo A, Tolosa J. Cerclage for prevention of perterm birth in women with a short cervix found on transvaginal ultrasound examination: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1311–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust O, Atlas R, Reed J van Gaalen J, Balducci J. Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: Why cerclage may not help. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1098–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN: 3-9000051-07-0 2012 [Online] Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Albert J. Bayesian computation with R, 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb WL, Chaiworapongsa T, Luke DA, Burgdorf K. An odd measure of risk: use and misuse of the odds ratio. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:685–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard J. The 2 × 2 table: a discussion from Bayesian viewpoint. Statist Sci 1998;13:351–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Ludmir J, Simonazzi G, Owen J. Transvaginal cervical cerclage: evidence for perioperative management strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:181–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israfil-Bayli F, Toozs-Hobson P, Lees C, et al. Cervical cerclage and type of suture material: a survey of UK consultants’ practice. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; [Epub ahead of print]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berghella V, Szychowski JM, Owen J, et al. Suture type and ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:2287–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionnidis JP. Contradicted and initially stronger effect in highly cited clinical research. JAMA 2005;294:218–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson VE. Revised standards for statistical evidence. PNAS 2013;110:19313–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen A, Alfirevic A, Tudur-Smith C, Williamson P. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss: individual patient data meta-analysis. BJOG 2007;114:1460–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin I, Salzer L, Maslovitz S, et al. Outcomes of mid-trimester emergency cerclage in twin pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012;32:246–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon L, Nasr B, Nizard J, et al. Emergency cerclage in cases of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome with a short cervix at the time of surgery and relationship to perinatal outcome. Prenat Diagn 2008;28:1256–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebarber A, Bender S, Silverstein M, et al. Outcomes of emergency or physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies compared to singleton pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;173:43–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar