Maternal outcomes according to mode of delivery in women with severe preeclampsia: a cohort study

References

• Noronha Neto C, Souza ASR, Amorim MMR. Tratamento da pré-eclâmpsia baseado em evidências [Evidence-based treatment of preeclampsia]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2010;32:459–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sibai BM. Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:369–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozurkewich E, Chilimigras J, Koepke E, et al. Indications for induction of labour: a best-evidence review. BJOG 2009;116:626–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza AS, Amorim MM, Feitosa FE. Comparison of sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour: a systematic review. BJOG 2008;115:1340–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catanzarite V, Quirk JG, Aisenbrey G. How do perinatologists manage preeclampsia? Am J Perinatol 1991;8:7–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanis MC, Robinson CJ, Hulsey TC, et al. Early-onset severe preeclampsia: induction of labour vs elective Caesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:262. e1–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coppage KH, Polzin WJ. Severe preeclampsia and delivery outcomes: is immediate Caesarean delivery beneficial? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:921–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drife J. Mode of delivery in the early preterm infant (<28 weeks). BJOG 2006;113:S81–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassar AH, Adra AM, Chakhtoura N, et al. Severe preeclampsia remote from term: labour induction or elective Caesarean delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1210–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Collabourating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Caesarean section. London (UK): National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2004:142
   Google Scholar
• ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:159–67
   Google Scholar
• Magee LA, Helewa M, Moutquin JM, von Dadelszen P, for the Hypertension Guideline Committee. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline, No. 206. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008;30:S1–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blackwell SC, Redman ME, Tomlinson M, et al. Labour induction for the preterm severe pre-eclamptic patient: is it worth the effort? J Matern Fetal Med 2001;10:305–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xenakis EM, Piper JM, Field N, Conway D, Langer O. Preeclampsia: is induction of labour more successful? Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:600–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuklina EV, Ayala C, Callaghan WM. Hypertensive disorders and severe obstetric morbidity in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:1299–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:S1–22
   Google Scholar
• Sibai BM. The HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets): much ado about nothing? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:311–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi SK, Powers JC, Nomeir AM, et al. The pathogenesis of acute pulmonary edema associated with hypertension. N Engl J Med 2001;344:17–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaño F, Gallego A, Pascual J, et al. Prognosis of acute tubular necrosis: an extended prospectively contrasted study. Nephron 1993;63:21–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Say L, Souza JP, Pattinson RC. WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications: maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:287–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:97–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victora CG, Huttly SR, Fuchs SC, Olinto MT. The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: a hierarchical approach. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26:224–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dissanayake VH, Samarasinghe HD, Morgan L, et al. Morbidity and mortality associated with pre-eclampsia at two tertiary care hospitals in Sri Lanka. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2007;33:56–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gowri V, Al-Zakwani I. Prevalence of Caesarean delivery in preeclamptic patients with elevated uric acid. Hypertens Pregnancy 2010;29:231–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, et al. World Health Organization 2005 Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. Br Med J 2007;335:1025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallasmaa N, Ekblad U, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, et al. Caesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:896–902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller EJ, Wu JM, Jannelli ML, et al. Neonatal outcomes associated with planned vaginal versus planned primary Caesarean delivery. J Perinatol 2010;30:258–64
   Google Scholar
• Eskild A, Vatten LJ. Abnormal bleeding associated with preeclampsia: a population study of 315,085 pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:154–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado Junior LC, Sevrin CE, Oliveira E, et al. [Association between mode of delivery and maternal complications in a public hospital in Greater Metropolitan São Paulo, Brazil]. Cad Saude Publica 2009;25:124–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng SY, Ithnin F, Sia AT, Ng CC. Ergometrine administration for post-partum haemorrhage in an undiagnosed pre-eclamptic. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008;36:113–15
   Google Scholar