The effects of isolated single umbilical artery on first and second trimester aneuploidy screening test parameters

References

• Heifetz SA. The umbilical cord: obstetrically important lesions. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1996;39:571–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thummala MR, Raju TN, Langenberg P. Isolated single umbilical artery anomaly and the risk for congenital malformations: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:580–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granese R, Coco C, Jeanty P. The value of single umbilical artery in the prediction of fetal aneuploidy: findings in 12,672 pregnant women. Ultrasound Q 2007;23:117–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gornall AS, Kurinczuk JJ, Konje JC. Antenatal detection of a single umbilical artery: does it matter? Prenat Diagn 2003;23:117–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salihoglu O, Karatekin G, Uslu S, et al. New intrauterine growth percentiles: a hospital-based study in Istanbul, Turkey. J Pak Med Assoc 2012;62:1070–4
   Google Scholar
• Spencer K, Cowans NJ, Spencer CE, Achillea N. A re-evaluation of the influence of maternal insulin-dependent diabetes on fetal nuchal translucency thickness and first-trimester maternal serum biochemical markers of aneuploidy. Prenat Diagn 2010;30:937–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig TS, Sørensen S, Jørgensen FS. Are there characteristics of the false-negative cases from the first trimester combined screening programme for Down syndrome? Curr Opin Obstet 2014;26:110–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer K, Heath V, El-Sheikhah A, et al. Ethnicity and the need for correction of biochemical and ultrasound markers of chromosomal anomalies in the first trimester: a study of Oriental, Asian and Afro-Caribbean populations. Prenat Diagn 2005;25:365–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowans NJ, Stamatopoulou A, Spencer K. The effect of Rhesus status on first-trimester pregnancy screening markers free beta human chorionic gonadotropin, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and nuchal translucency. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:505–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abuhamad AZ, Shaffer W, Mari G, et al. Single umbilical artery: does it matter which artery is missing? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:728–32
   Google Scholar
• Voskamp BJ, Fleurke-Rozema H, Oude-Rengerink K, et al. Relationship of isolated single umbilical artery to fetal growth, aneuploidy and perinatal mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:622–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkrand JW, Pettigrew C, Lentz SU, et al. Volumetric umbilical artery blood flow: comparison of the normal versus the single umbilical artery cord. J Matern Fetal Med 2001;10:116–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mu SC, Lin CH, Chen YL, et al. The perinatal outcomes of asymptomatic isolated single umbilical artery in full term neonates. Pediatr Neonatol 2008;49:230–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hua M, Odibo AO, Macones GA, et al. Single umbilical artery and its associated findings. Gynecol 2010;115:930–4
   Google Scholar
• Dagklis T, Defigueiredo DI, Casagrandi D, Nicolaides KH. Isolated single umbilical artery and fetal karyotype. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:291–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Hof MC, Wilson RD; Diagnostic Imaging Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada; Genetics Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Fetal soft markers in obstetric ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2005;27:592–636
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James DK, Steer PJ, Weiner CP, Gonik B. High risk pregnancy. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders; 1995:614–15
   Google Scholar
• Coskun A, Balbay O, Duran S, et al. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and asthma. Adv Ther 2007;24:362–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laterza OF, Cameron SJ, Chappell D, et al. Evaluation of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A as a prognostic indicator in acute coronary syndrome patients. Clin Chim Acta 2004;348:163–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamberty CO, de Carvalho MH, Miguelez J, et al. Ultrasound detection rate of single umbilical artery in the first trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 2011;31:865–8
   Google Scholar
• Murray MJ, Nicholson JC. α-Fetoprotein. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2011;96:141–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Los FJ, Debruijn HWA, Van Beek Calkoen-Carpay T, et al. AFP transport across the fetal membranes in the human. Prenat Diagn 1985;5:277–81
   Google Scholar
• Brownbill P, Edwards D, Jones C, et al. Mechanisms of alphafetoprotein transfer in the perfused human placental cotyledon from uncomplicated pregnancy. J Clin Invest 1995;96:2220–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, et al. Prenatal assessment of Wharton's jelly in umbilical cords with single artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:42–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownbill P, Mahendran D, Owen D, et al. Denudations as paracellular routes for alphafetoprotein and creatinine across the human syncytiotrophoblast. Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2000;278:R677–83
   Google Scholar
• Newby D, Dalgliesh G, Lyall F, Aitken DA. Alphafetoprotein and alphafetoprotein receptor expression in the normal human placenta at term. Placenta 2005;26:190–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:102–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AIUM Practice Guideline for the Performance of Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations. Available from: http://www.aium.org/publications/guidelines/obstetric.pdf [last accessed 3 Mar 2011]
   Google Scholar
• Cuckle H, Benn P, Wright D. Down syndrome screening in the first and/or second trimester: model predicted performance using meta-analysis parameters. Semin Perinatol 2005;29:252–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar