References
- Feltovic H, Hall TJ, Berghella V. Beyond cervical length: emerging technologies for assessing the pregnant cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:345–54
- Gravett MG, Rubens CE, Nunes TM; GAPPS Review Group. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (2 of 7): discovery science. BMC Pregn Childbirth 2010;10:S2
- Romero R. Vaginal progesterone to reduce the rate of preterm birth and neonatal morbidity: a solution at last. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2011;7:501–4
- Brandão RS, Pires CR, Souza E, et al. [Biometric analysis of uterine cervix during pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging]. Radiol Bras 2008;1:235–9
- Levine D, Hulka CA, Ludmir J, Li W, Edelman RR. Placenta accreta: evaluation with color Doppler US, power Doppler US, and MR imaging. Radiology 1997;205:773–6
- Matijević R, Grgić O, Klobucar A. [Diagnosis and therapy of cervical insufficiency]. Acta Med Croatica 2003;57:287–94
- Oláh KS. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of the cervical hydration state. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;101:255–7
- Chan YL, Lam WW, Lau TK, et al. Cervical assessment by magnetic resonance imaging – its relationship to gestational age and interval to delivery. Br J Radiol 1998;71:155–9
- Rae DW, Smith FW, Templeton AA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the human cervix: a study of the effects of prostaglandins in the first trimester. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1744–7
- House M, O'Callaghan M, Bahrami S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix during pregnancy: effect of gestational age and prior vaginal birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1554–60
- Hricak H, Chang YC, Cann CE, Parer JT. Cervical incompetence: preliminary evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1990;174:821–6
- Scoutt LM, McCauley TR, Flynn SD, et al. Zonal anatomy of the cervix: correlation of MR imaging and histologic examination of hysterectomy specimens. Radiology 1993;86:159–62
- Berghella V, Berghella M. Cervical length assessment by ultrasound. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:543–4
- Gomez R, Galasso M, Romero R, et al. Ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix is better than cervical digital examination as a predictor of the likelihood of premature delivery in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:956–64
- Carr DB, Smith K, Parsons L, et al. Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:554–8
- Smith FW, Adam AH, Phillips WD. NMR imaging in pregnancy. Lancet 1983;1:61–2
- Brown R, Gagnon R, Delisle MF, et al. Cervical insufficiency and cervical cerclage. J Obstet Gynecol Can 2013;35:1115–27
- de Tejada BM, Faltin DL, Kinkel K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervix in women at high risk for preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:1392–7