A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction

References

• Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 1964; 24: 266–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollnow DM, Broekhuizen FF. Randomized, double-blind trial of prostaglandin E2intravaginal gel versus low-dose oxytocin for cervical ripening before induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1910–1916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson GM, Sharp HT, Varner MW. Cervical ripening before induction of labor: a randomized trial of prostaglandin E2versus low-dose oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 1092–1096
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H, Mitchell S, Frederick J, Simeon D, Brown D. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 244–247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wing DA, Jones MM, Rahall A, Goodwin TM, Paul RH. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1804–1810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing DA, Rahall A, Jones MM, Goodwin TM, Paul RH. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1811–1816
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buser D, Mora G, Arias F. A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 581–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschall DS, Borgida AF, Mihalek JJ, Sauer F, Rodis JE. A randomized clinical trial comparing misoprostol with prostaglandin E2gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1067–1070
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Del Valle GO, Delke I, Schroeder PA, Briones DK. Labor induction with the prostaglandin E1methyl analogue misoprostol versus oxytocin: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 332–336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer RL, Gilson GJ, Morrison DS, Martin D, Gonzales JL, Qualls CR. A randomized trial of misoprostol and oxytocin for induction of labor: safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 387–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varaklis K, Gumina R, Stubblefield PG. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2gel for induction of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 86: 541–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Wears RL, Delke I, Gaudier FL. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 633–642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuck FJ, Huffaker BJ. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1137–1142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundle WR, Young DC. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 521–525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surbek DV, Boesiger H, Hoesli I, Pavic N, Holzgreve W. A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2to induce labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1018–1023
   Google Scholar
• Windrim R, Bennett K, Mundle W, Young DC. Oral administration of misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 392–397
   Google Scholar
• Ngai SW, To WK, Lao T, Ho PC. Cervical priming with oral misoprostol in pre-labor rupture of the membranes at term. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 923–926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing DA, Paul RH. A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 158–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah LA, Sanchez-Ramos L, Rosa C, Del Valle GO, Gaudier FL, Delke I, Kaunitz AM. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1analog misoprostol for labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 364–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zieman M, Fong SK, Benowitz NL, Banskter D, Darney PD. Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90: 88–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magtibay PM, Ramin KD, Harris DY, Ramsey PS, Ogburn PL. Misoprostol as a labor induction agent. J. Matem. -Fetal Med 1998; 7: 15–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett BB. Uterine rupture during induction of labor at term with intravaginal misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 832–833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing DA, Lovett K, Paul RH. Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 828–830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar