74
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Assessment of communicating systems on the basis of an ecological conceptual framework

Pages 23-33 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Bergman B., & Klefsjö B. Quality from customer needs to customer satisfaction. Studentlitteratur, Lund 1994
  • Borg E. Audiology in an ecological perspective—development of a conceptual framework. Scandinavian Audiology, Suppl 1998; 49: 132–139
  • Borg E. Ecological aspects of auditory rehabilitation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2000; 120: 232–241
  • Borg E., Danermark B., Borg B. Behavioural awareness, interaction and counseling education in audiological rehabilitation. Development of methods in application in a pilot study. International Journal of Audiology 2002a; 41: 308–322
  • Borg E., Risberg A., McAllister R., Undemar B.-M., Edquist G., Reinholdson A.-C., et al. Language development in hearing-impaired children. Establishment of a reference material for a ‘Language test for hearing-impaired children’, LATHIC. International Journal of Pediatric Otolaryngology 2002b; 65: 15–26
  • Carson A. J., Pichora-Fuller M. K. Health promotion and audiology: the community-clinic link. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology 1997; 30: 29–51
  • Clements F. E. Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 242 1916
  • Cox R. Editorial. Ear and Hearing 2000; 21: 1S.
  • Cox R., Hyde M., Gatehouse S., Noble W., Dillon H., Bentler R., et al. Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation. Ear and Hearing 2000; 21: 106S–115S
  • Dillon H., James A., Ginis J. Client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and its relationship or several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1997; 8: 27–43
  • Dunster J., Dunster K. Dictionary of natural resource management. CAB International, Wollingford 1996
  • Erber N. P. Communication therapy for adults with sensory loss. Claves Publishing, Melbourne 1996
  • Foster S. Communication as social engagement: implications for interactions between deaf and hearing persons. Scandinavian Audiology 1998; 27(suppl 49)116–124
  • Gatehouse S. Hearing aid benefit profile: derivation and validation of a client centred outcome measure for hearing-aid services. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1999; 10: 80–103
  • Haeckel E. Generelle Morphologic des Organismen. Verlag von Georg Rainier, Berlin 1866
  • Hallberg L.-M. Occupational hearing loss: coping and family life. Scandinavian Audiology 1996; 25(suppl 43)25–33
  • Ecological psychology in contact, H. Heft. Lawrence Erlbaum, London 2001
  • Johnson C. E., Pichora-Fuller M. K. How communication goals may alter handicap. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 1994; 18: 235–242
  • Liebig J. Die organische Chemie in Ihrer Anwendung auf Physiologie und Pathologie. Friedrich Bleweg u. Sohn, Braunschweig 1842
  • Newman C. W., Jacobson G. P. Self-assessment scales in audiology. Seminars in Hearing 1993; 14: 299–390
  • Noble W. Self-assessment of hearing and related functions. Whurr, London 1998
  • Noble W., Hétu R. An ecological approach to disability and handicap in relation to impaired hearing. Audiology 1994; 33: 117–126
  • Pichora-Fuller M. K., Johnson C. E., Roodenburg K. E. J. The discrepancy between hearing impairment and handicap: balancing transaction and interaction in conversation. Special Issue on Intergenerational and Aging Issues. Journal of Applied Communication Research 1998; 26: 99–119
  • Pichora-Fuller M. K., Robertson L. F. Hard of hearing residents in a home for the aged. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 1994; 18: 278–288
  • Pichora-Fuller M. K., Robertson L. F. Planning and evaluation of a rehabilitation programme in a home for the aged: use of hearing aids and assistive listening devices. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 1997; 21: 174–186
  • Assessment of health care technologies. Case studies, key concepts and strategic issues, A. Szcsepura, J. Kankaanpää. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester
  • Wessels R., de Witte L., Andrich R., Ferrario M., Persson J., Oberg B., et al. IPPA, a user-centred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology. Technology and Disability 2000; 13: 105–115

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.