Prescribed real-ear and achieved real-life differences in children's hearing aids adjusted according to the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions

References

• Bagatto M., Moodie S.T., Scollie S., Seewald R., Moodie K.S. . 2005. Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the desired sensation level method. Trends Amplif, 9, 199–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Ching T., Katsch R. Keidser G. 2001. NALNL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan J.C. Geisler C.D. 1990. Estimation of eardrum acoustic pressure and of ear canal length from remote points in the canal. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 1237–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C. Britton L. 2008. Repeatability of real-ear-to-coupler differences measured by an acoustic method for determining probe tube insertion depth. Aus NZ J Audiol, 30(2), 91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Britton L., Dillon H. Agung K. 2002. RECD, REAG, NAL-NL1: Accurate and practical methods for fitting non-linear hearing aids to infants and children. Hear Rev, 9(8), 12–20, 52.
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C. Dillon H. 2003. Prescribing amplification for children: Adult-equivalent hearing loss, real-ear aided gain, and NAL-NL1. Trends Amplif, 7(1), 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Dillon H., Katsch R. Byrne D. 2001. Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear, 22(3), 212–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Scollie S.D., Dillon H. Seewald R. (2010). A crossover, double-blind comparison of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children with mild to moderately severe hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 49, S4–S15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelisse L.E., Seewald R.C. Jamieson D.G. 1995. The input/output (i/o) formula: A theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 1854–1864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon H. 1999. NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids. Hear J, 52, 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H. 2001. Hearing Aids. New York: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks D.D. Kincaid G.E. 1987. Basic acoustic considerations of ear canal probe measurements. Ear Hear, 8, 60S–67S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber N.P. Witt L.H. 1977. Effects of stimulus intensity on speech perception by deaf children. J Speech Hear Disord, 42, 271–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gengel R.W., Pascoe D. Shore I. 1971. A frequency-response procedure for evaluating and selecting hearing aids for severely hearing impaired children. J Speech Hear Disord, 36, 341–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamm C., Dirks D.D. Mickey M.R. 1978. Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable level judgements. J Speech Hear Disord, 21, 668–681.
   Google Scholar
• Macrae J. 1986. Relationships between the hearing threshold levels, aided threshold levels and aided speech discrimination of severely and profoundly deaf children. NAL Report No. 107.
   Google Scholar
• Moodie K.S., Seewald R.C. Sinclair S.T. 1994. Procedure for predicting real-ear hearing aid performance in young children. Am J Audiol, 3, 23–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pascoe D.P. 1978. An approach to hearing aid selection. Hear Instr, 29, 12–16, 36.
   Google Scholar
• Seewald R.C., Moodie S.T. Scollie S.D. 2005. The DSL method for pediatric hearing instrument fitting: Historical perspective and current issues. Trends Amplif, 9(4).
   Google Scholar
• Seewald R.C., Cornelisse L.E., Ramji K.V. . 1997. DSL v4.1 for Windows: A software implementation of the desired sensation level (DSL[i/o]) method for fitting linear gain and wide-dynamic-range compression hearing instruments. Users’ manual. London, Ontario: Hearing Health Care Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair S.T., Beauchaine K.L., Moodie K.S., Feigin J.A., Seewald R.C. . 1996. Repeatability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement as a function of age. Am J Audiol, 5, 52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Smith L.Z. Boothroyd A. 1989. Performance intensity function and speech perception in hearing impaired children. Presented at Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. St Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Storey L. Dillon D. 2001. Estimating the location of probe microphones relative to tympanic membrane. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 150–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan R. 1988. Probe tube microphone placement near the tympanic membrane. Hear Instrum, 39(7), 43–44, 60.
   Google Scholar
• Tharpe A.M., Sladen D., Huta H.M. Rothpletz A.M. 2001. Practical considerations of real-ear-to-coupler difference measures in infants. Am J Audiol, 10, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zemplenyi J., Dirks D.D. Gilman S. 1985. Probe-determined hearing-aid gain compared to functional and other coupler gains. J Speech Hear Res, 28, 394–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar