Deterioration of cortical responses to amplitude modulations of low-frequency carriers after high-frequency cochlear lesion in guinea pigs

References

• Bacon S.P., Gleitman R.M. 1992. Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses. J Speech Hear Res, 35, 642–653.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bacon S.P., Moore B.C. 1987. Transient masking and the temporal course of simultaneous tone-on-tone masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 81, 1073–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon S.P., Viemeister N.F. 1985. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology, 24, 117–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskent D. 2006. Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 2908–2925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buus S., Scharf B., Florentine M. 1984. Lateralization and frequency selectivity in normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 76, 77–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dau T., Kollmeier B., Kohlrausch A. 1997. Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. I. Detection and masking with narrow-band carriers. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 2892–2905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dau T., Kollmeier B., Kohlrausch A. 1997. Modeling auditory processing of amplitude modulation. II. Spectral and temporal integration. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 2906–2919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y., Wang J., Yin S. 2007. General anesthesia changes gap-evoked auditory responses in guinea pigs. Acta Oto Laryngologica, 127, 143–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y., Yin S., Wang J. 2009. Cortical responses to amplitude modulation in guinea pigs and the effects of general anesthesia by pentobarbital. Hear Res, 247, 40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florentine M., Buus S. 1984. Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments. J Speech Hear Res, 27, 449–455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Formby C. 1987. Perception of the temporal envelope of amplitude-modulation noise by hearing-impaired listeners. W.A. Yost, C.S. Watson Auditory Processing of Complex Sounds. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 136–146.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest T.G., Formby C., Sherlock L.P. 1995. Measurement and Modeling of Temporal Gap Detection for Normal and Meniere Listeners. Omaha, NE: Boys Town.
   Google Scholar
• Frisina R.D., Walton J.P., Lynch-Armour M.A., Byrd J.D. 1998. Inputs to a physiologically characterized region of the inferior colliculus of the young adult CBA mouse. Hear Res, 115, 61–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant K.W., Summers V., Leek M.R. 1998. Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 1051–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz A.R., Dubno J.R., Ahlstrom J.B. 2002. Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 409–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine D.R., Rajan R., Brown M. 2001. Injury- and use-related plasticity in adult auditory cortex. Audiol Neurootol, 6, 192–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joris P.X., Van De Sande B., van der Heijden M. 2005. Temporal damping in response to broadband noise. I. Inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol, 93, 1857–1870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlrausch A., Fassel R., Dau T. 2000. The influence of carrier level and frequency on modulation and beat-detection thresholds for sinusoidal carriers. J Acoust Soc Am, 108, 723–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwada S., Batra R., Maher V.L. 1986. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res, 21, 179–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leake P.A., Hradek G.T., Snyder R.L. 1999. Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness. J Comp Neurol, 412, 543–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leake P.A., Snyder R.L., Rebscher S.J., Moore C.M., Vollmer M. 2000. Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single- vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness. Hear Res, 147, 221–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Debruille L., Garnier S., Fleuriot P., Moore B.C. 2009. Abnormal processing of temporal fine structure in speech for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 27–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Gilbert G., Carn H., Garnier S., Moore B.C. 2006. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103, 18866–18869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin J.S., Jerger J.F. 2005. Some effects of aging on central auditory processing. J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, 25–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C. 1996. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear, 17, 133–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C. 2007. Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological and Technical Issues (2nd ed.). Chichester: UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Glasberg B.R. 1987. Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns. Hear Res, 28, 209–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Glasberg B.R. 2001. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 1067–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P., Rappaport J.M., Gulliver J.M. 1994. Impaired word recognition in noise by patients with noise-induced cochlear hearing loss: Contribution of temporal resolution defect. Am J Otol, 15, 679–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popelar J., Grecova J., Rybalko N., Syka J. 2008. Comparison of noise-induced changes of auditory brainstem and middle latency response amplitudes in rats. Hear Res, 245, 82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell D.W., John S.M., Schneider B.A., Picton T.W. 2004. Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 3581–3593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodenbrug M. 1977. Investigation of temporal effects with amplitude modulated signals. E.F. Evans, J.P. Wilson Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing. London: Academic, 429–437.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenburg M., Verweij C., van den Brink G. 1972. Analysis of evoked responses in man elicited by sinusoidally modulated noise. Audiology, 11, 283–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen S. 1992. Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 336, 367–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen S., Smith D.A.J. 1988. Temporally-based auditory sensation in the profoundly hearing-impaired listener. H. Duifhius, J.W. Horst, H.P. Wit Basic Issues in Hearing. London: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggero M.A. 1994. Cochlear delays and traveling waves: Comments on ‘Experimental look at cochlear mechanics’. Audiology, 33, 131–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salvi R.J.H., Boettcher F.A., Powers N. 1992. Functional changes in central auditory pathways resulting from cochlear disease, central auditory processing: A transdisciplinary view Mosby Year Book: St. Louis, 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Salvi R.J.W., Powers N. 1996. Rapid functional reorganization in the inferior colliculus and cochlear nucleus after acute cochlear damage. R.J.H. Salvi, D. Henderson, F. Fiorino, V. Colletti Auditory Plasticity and Regeneration. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 275–296.
   Google Scholar
• Smoski W.J., Trahiotis C. 1986. Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 1541–1547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder R.L., Vollmer M., Moore C.M., Rebscher S.J., Leake P.A. . 2000. Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated intracochlear electrical pulses in deaf cats. J Neurophysiol, 84, 166–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Linden D., Suffield J.B., Hamel G., Picton T.W. 1984. Human auditory steady state potentials. Ear Hear, 5, 105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland E.A., Viemeister N.F. 1997. The effects of frequency region and bandwidth on the temporal modulation transfer function. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 1799–1810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland E.A., Viemeister N.F., Van Tasell D.J., Preminger J.E. 2004. The role of high-CF fibers in speech perception: Comments on Horwitz et al (2002). J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 49–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A., Phillips D.P. 1996. Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners. Ear Hear, 17, 478–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A., Phillips D.P. 1998. Recognition of temporally distorted words by listeners with and without a simulated hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 199–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuart A., Phillips D.P., Green W.B. 1995. Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. Am J Otol, 16, 658–663.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szczepaniak W.S., Moller A.R. 1995. Evidence of decreased GABAergic influence on temporal integration in the inferior colliculus following acute noise exposure: A study of evoked potentials in the rat. Neuroscience Letters, 196, 77–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trees D.E., Turner C.W. 1986. Spread of masking in normal subjects and in subjects with high-frequency hearing loss. Audiology, 25, 70–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner C.W., Souza P.E., Forget L.N. 1995. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 2568–2576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viemeister N.F. 1977. Temporal factors in audition: A systems analysis approach. W. Evans Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing. London: Academic Press, 419–428.
   Google Scholar
• Viemeister N.F. 1979. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am, 66, 1364–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J., Ding D., Salvi R.J. 2002. Functional reorganization in chinchilla inferior colliculus associated with chronic and acute cochlear damage. Hear Res, 168, 238–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegrebe L., Patterson R.D. 1999. Quantifying the distortion products generated by amplitude-modulated noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 2709–2718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willott J.F. 1996. Physiological plasticity in the auditory system and its possible relevance to hearing aid use, deprivation effects, and acclimatization. Ear Hear, 17, 66s–77s.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin S.K., Feng Y.M., Chen Z.N., Wang J. 2008. The effect of noise-induced sloping high-frequency hearing loss on the gap-response in the inferior colliculus and auditory cortex of guinea pigs. Hear Res, 239, 126–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar