Music perception of cochlear implant users: A questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program

References

• Bismarck G.V. 1974. Timbre of steady sounds: a factorial investigation of its verbal attributes. Acustica, 30, 146–159.
   Google Scholar
• Blamey P., Arndt P., Bergeron F., Bredberg G., Brimacombe J. . 1996. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neuro Otol, 1, 293–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Driscoll V.D., Oleson J., Jiang D. & Gfeller K. 2009. Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 71–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetterman B.L., Domico E.H. 2002. Speech recognition in background noise of cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 126, 257–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J., Nogaki G. 2007. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear, 28, 302–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin J.J., Fu Q.J., Oba S. 2008. Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am EL, 124(4), 189–195.
   Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Turner C. 2003. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope, 113, 1726–1730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Turner C. 2004. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 124, 344–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Turner C., Gfeller K.E., Lowder M.W. 2005. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope, 115, 796–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K. 1998. Music appreciation, from the perspective of implant recipients Contact, 12(3), 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Christ A., Knutson J., Witt S., Mehr M. 2003. The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. J Music Ther, 40, 78–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Christ A., Knutson J.F., Witt S., Murray K.T. . 2000a. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 390–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K., Knutson J.F., Woodworth G., Witt S., DeBus B. 1998. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K., Mehr M., Witt S. 2001. Aural rehabilitation of music perception and enjoyment of adult cochlear implant users. JARA, 34, 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Oleson J., Knutson J.F., Breheny P., Driscoll V. . 2008. Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 120–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Turner C., Knutson J., Zhang X., Froman R. . 2004. Relationships among music, cognitive, and speech in noise measures. Paper presented at The 8th Cochlear Implant Conference. Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Turner C., Oleson J., Zhang X., Gantz B. . 2007. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear, 28, 412–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Witt S., Adamek M., Mehr M., Rogers J. . 2002a. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 132–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K., Witt S., Stordahl J., Mehr M., Woodworth G. 2000b. The effects of training on melody recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant recipients. J Acad Rehabil Audiol, 33, 115–138.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Witt S., Woodworth G., Mehr M.A., Knutson J. 2002b. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 111, 349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmeder M., Lutman M. 2006. The identification of musical instruments through Nucleus cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants Int, 7, 148–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiefer J., Pok M., Adunka O., Sturzebecher E., Baumgartner W. . 2005. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: Results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol, 10, 134–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y.Y., Cruz R., Jones J.A., Zeng F.G. 2004. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear, 25, 173–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y.Y., Stickney G.S., Zeng F.G. 2005. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 117, 1351–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassaletta L., Castro A., Bastarrica M., Perez-Mora R., Madero R. . 2007. Does music perception have an impact on quality of life following cochlear implantation? Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 127, 682–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi V. 2008. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception: A review. Otorinolaringologia, 58(4), 169–190.
   Google Scholar
• Looi V., McDermott H., McKay C., Hickson L. 2008a. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Ear Hear, 29, 421–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi V., McDermott H., McKay C., Hickson L. 2008b. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing. Int J Audiol, 47, 257–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi V., McDermott H., McKay C., & Hickson L. 2007. Comparisons of quality ratings for music by cochlear implant and hearing aid users. Ear Hear, 28(2 suppl), 59s–61s.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott H.J. 2004. Music perception with cochlear implants: A review. Trends Amplif, 8, 49–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKay C.M. 2004. Psychophysics and electrical stimulation. F.G. Zeng, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing. New York: Springer, 286–333.
   Google Scholar
• McKay C.M. 2005. Spectral processing in cochlear implants. M.S. Malmierca, D.R.F. Irvine Auditory Spectral Processing. London: Academic Press, 474–509.
   Google Scholar
• Mirza S., Douglas S.A., Lindsey P., Hildreth T., Hawthorne M. 2003. Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: A patient questionnaire. Cochlear Implants Int, 4, 85–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oxenham A.J., Bernstein J.G., Penagos H. 2004. Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101, 1421–1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijl S. 1997. Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally hearing subjects. Ear Hear, 18, 364–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijl S., Schwarz D.W. 1995. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am, 98, 886–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulkind M.D. 1999. Long-term memory for temporal structure: evidence form the identification of well-known and novel songs. Mem Cognit, 27, 896–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon R.V., Fu Q.J., Galvin J., Friesen L. 2004. Speech perception with cochlear implants. F.G. Zeng, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing. New York: Springer, 334–376.
   Google Scholar
• Sucher C.M., McDermott H.J. 2007. Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users. Hear Res, 230, 80–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y.C., Clark G.M. 1985. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am, 77, 1881–1888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C., Gantz B.J., Vidal C., Behrens A., Henry B.A. 2004. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 1729–1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R.S., Parkinson A.J., Wilson B.S., Witt S., Preece J.P. . 2002. Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: Speech perception and localization. Ear Hear, 23, 98–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G. 2002. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hear Res, 174, 101–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G. 2004. Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif, 8, 1–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar