The French digit triplet test: A hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise

References

• Bosman A.J. and Smoorenburg G.F. 1995. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology, 34, 260–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse S. and Noble W. 2004. The speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S., Lantz J. and Fitzgibbons P. 1994. Age effects on measures of hearing disability. Ear Hear, 15, 262–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallberg L.R-M. 1998. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the hearing disabilities and handicaps scale, based on a clinical sample of 101 men with noise-induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol, 27, 21–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B. & Wesselkamp M. 1997. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 2412–2421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Kapteyn T.S. & Festen J.M. 1998. The self-reported handicapping effect of hearing disabilities. Audiology, 37, 302–312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luts H., Boon E., Wable J. & Wouters J. 2008. FIST: A French sentence test for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 47, 373–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nondahl D.M., Cruickshanks K.J., Wiley T.L., Tweed T.S., Klein R.. 1998. Accuracy of self-reported hearing loss. Audiology, 37, 295–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R. & Mimpen A.M 1979a. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. J Acoust Soc Am, 66, 1333–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. and Mimpen A.M. 1979b. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popelka M. M., Cruickshanks K.J., Wiley T.L., Tweed T.S., Klein B.E.K.. 1998. Low prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults with hearing loss: The epidemiology of hearing loss study. J Am Geriatr Soc, 46, 1075–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C. & Houtgast T. 2005. Results from the Dutch speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Ear Hear, 26, 89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C. Houtgast T. 2006. Measurements and calculations on the simple up-down adaptive procedure for speech-in-noise tests. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 1608–1621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Kapteyn T.S. and Houtgast T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol, 43, 15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Kramer S.E. & Houtgast T. 2006a. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population. Ear Hear, 27, 538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Merkus P. & Houtgast T. 2006b. How we do it: The Dutch functional hearing-screening tests by telephone and internet. Clin Otolaryngol, 31, 436–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F. 1992. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 421–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumble S.C. & Piterman L. 1992. Hearing loss in the elderly. A survey in general practice. Med J Aust, 157, 400–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaillancourt V., Laroche C., Mayer C., Basque C., Nali M.. 2005. Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Franco–phone populations. Int J Audiol, 44, 358–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wieringen A. & Wouters J. 2008. LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 47, 348–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versfeld N.J., Daalder L., Festen J.M. & Houtgast T. 2000. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 107 (3), 1671–1684.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagener K.C., Bräcker T., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 2006. Evaluation des Ziffern-Tripel-Tests über Kopfhörer und Telefon. 9. DGA Jahrestagung. Köln.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener K.C., Josvassen J.L. & Ardenkjaer R. 2003. Design, optimization, and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise. Int J Audiol, 42, 10–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar