Monaural and binaural frequency selectivity in hearing-impaired subjects

References

• Baker R.J. & Rosen S. 2002. Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am, 111(3), 1330–1339.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beutelmann R. & Brand T. 2006. Prediction of speech intelligibility in spatial noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 120(1), 331–342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Boer E. & Bos C.E. 1962. On the concept of the critical band. 4th Int. Congr. Acoust., Copenhagen, H13.
   Google Scholar
• Brand T. & Hohmann V. 2002. An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling. J Acoust Soc Am, 112(4), 1597–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst A.W. & Plomp R. 1992. Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 92(6), 3132–3139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cramer E.M. & Huggins W.H. 1958. Creation of pitch through binaural interaction. J Acoust Soc Am, 30(5), 413–417.
   Google Scholar
• Culling J.F., Summerfield A.Q. & Marshall D.H. 1998. Dichotic pitches as illusions of binaural unmasking. I. Huggins’ pitch and the ‘binaural edge pitch’. J Acoust Soc Am, 103(6), 3509–3526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasberg B.R. & Moore B.C.J. 1986. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am, 76(2), 419–427.
   Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R. & Moore B.C.J. 1990. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res, 47, 103–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J.W., Tyler R.S. & Fernandes M.A. 1983. Monaural and binaural auditory frequency resolution measured using bandlimited noise and notched-noise masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 73(3), 894–898.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Häusler R., Colburn H.S. & Marr E.M. 1983. Sound localization in subjects with impaired hearing. Acta Otolaryngol, S400, 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hohmann V. 2002. Frequency analysis and synthesis using a Gammatone filterbank. Acta Acust Acust, 88, 433–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holube I. 1993. Experimente und Modellvorstellungen zur Psychoakustik und zum Sprachverstehen bei Normal- und Schwerhörigen (Experiments and models concerning psychoacoustics and speech perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners), PhD thesis, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Holube I. & Kollmeier B. 1996. Speech intelligibility prediction in hearing-impaired listeners based on a psychoacoustically motivated perception model. J Acoust Soc Am, 100(3), 1703–1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E., Espinoza-Varas B. & Watson C.S. 1988. Modeling sensorineural hearing loss. I. Model and retrospective evaluation. J Acoust Soc Am, 83(1), 188–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irino T. & Patterson R.D.2001. A compressive gammachirp auditory filter for both physiological and psychophysical data. J Acoust Soc Am, 109(5), 2008–2022.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinkel M., Kollmeier B. & Holube I. 1991. Binaurales Hören bei Normal-hörenden und Schwerhörigen I: Meßmethode und Meßergebnisse (Bin-aural interaction with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners I: Measurement methods and experimental results). Audiologische Akustik, 30(6), 192–201.
   Google Scholar
• Kinkel M. & Kollmeier B.1992. Binaurales Hören bei Normalhörenden und Schwerhörigen II: Analyse der Ergebnisse (Binaural interaction with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners II: Analysis of the results). Audiologische Akustik, 31(1), 22–34.
   Google Scholar
• Koehnke J., Culotta C.P., Hawley M.L. & Colburn H.S.1995. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Ear Hear, 16(4), 331–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kollmeier B.. 1999. On the four factors involved in sensorineural hearing loss. In: T. Dau, V. Hohmann, B. Kollmeier. Psychophysics, Physiology and Models of Hearing, Singapore, World Scientific, ISBN 981-02-3741-3, pp. 211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Leek M.R. & Summers V. 1993. Auditory filter shapes of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners in continuous broadband noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 94(6), 3127–3137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am, 49(2), 467–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D. 1968. Masking-level differences determined with and without interaural disparities in masker intensity. J Acoust Soc Am, 44(1), 212–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nitschmann M. 2008a. Frequenzauflösung beim binauralen Hören (Frequency selectivity in binaural hearing). Zeitschrift für Audiologie, 47(3), 116–117.
   Google Scholar
• Nitschmann M., Verhey J.L. & Kollmeier B.2008b. Spektrale Aspekte der binauralen Verarbeitung bei Schwerhörigen (Spectral aspects of bin-aural processing in hearing-impaired subjects). In:11. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie, Zeitschrift für Audiologie, Suppl. 11, CDROM.
   Google Scholar
• Nitschmann M., Verhey J.L. & Kollmeier B. 2008c. Frequency selectivity in diotic and dichotic masking conditions for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 3457.
   Google Scholar
• Nitschmann M., Verhey J.L. & Kollmeier B. 2009. The role of across-frequency processes in dichotic listening conditions. J Acoust Soc Am, 126(6), 3188–3198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van de Par S. & Kohlrausch A. 1999. Dependence of binaural masking level differences on center frequency, masker bandwidth, and interaural parameters. J Acoust Soc Am, 106(4), 1940–1947.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson R.D. 1976. Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 59(3), 640–654.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson R.D., Nimmo-Smith I., Weber D.L. & Milroy R.1982. The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 72(6), 1788–1803.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson R.D., Allerhand M.H. & Giguère C. 1995. Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: A modular architecture and a software platform. J Acoust Soc Am, 98(4), 1890–1894.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson R.D., Unoki M. & Irino T. 2003. Extending the domain of center frequencies for the compressive gammachirp auditory filter. J Acoust Soc Am, 114(3), 1529–1542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peissig J. & Kollmeier B. 1997. Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 101(3), 1660–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters R.W. & Moore B.C.J. 1992. Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies in young and elderly hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 91(1), 256–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen S., Baker R.J. & Darling A. 1998. Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 Hz in normal hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 103(5), 2539–2550.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santurette S. & Dau T. 2007. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Hear Res, 223, 29–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verhey J.L., Anweiler A.K. & Hohmann V. 2006 Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration in hearing-impaired listeners. Int J Audiol, 45, 287–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener K.C. 2003. Factors influencing sentence intelligibility in noise, PhD thesis, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Universität, Oldenburg. An online version is available at http://medi.uni-oldenburg.de/html/dissertations.html (last viewed in December, 2009).
   Google Scholar