Auditory steady-state evoked potentials vs. compound action potentials for the measurement of suppression tuning curves in the sedated dog puppy

References

• Abbas P.J., Gorga MP. 1981. AP responses in forward masking paradigms and their relationship to responses of auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am, 69, 492–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Kim Y., Suzuki Y., Fuse T. . 1993. Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hear Res, 6, 253–261.
   Google Scholar
• Blake R. 2002. Electronic Communication Systems. USA: Delmar.
   Google Scholar
• Boettcher F.A, Poth E.A., Mills J.H., Dubno J.R. 2001. The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hear Res, 153, 32–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown C.J., Abbas P.J. 1987. A comparison of AP and ABR tuning curves in the guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Am, 25, 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• Coppens A., Resibois A., Poncelet L. 2000. Bilateral deafness in a Maltese terrier and a great Pyrenean puppy: Inner ear morphology. J Comp Path, 122, 223–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppens A., Kiss R., Heizmann C., Deltenre P., Poncelet L. 2001. An original inner ear neuroepithelial degeneration in a deaf Rottweiler puppy. Hear Res, 161, 65–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppens A., Steinberg S., Poncelet L. 2003. Inner ear morphology in a bilaterally deaf Dogo Argentino pup. J Comp Path, 128, 67–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppens A.G., Gilbert-Gregory S., Steinberg S.A., Heizmann C., Poncelet L. 2005. Inner ear histopathology in ‘nervous Pointer dogs’ with severe hearing loss. Hear Res, 200, 51–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P., Cheatham M.A. 1976. Compound action potential (AP) tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am, 59, 591–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P., Cheatham M.A. 1976. Analog of two-tone suppression in whole nerve responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 62, 1048–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan T.G., Mills J.H., Schmiedt R.A. 1985. A comparison of brainstem, whole-nerve AP, and single-fiber tuning curves in the gerbil: Normative data. Hear Res, 17, 259–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer E., Bouwmeester J. 1974. Critical bands and sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol, 13, 236–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Egan J.P., Hake H.W. 1950. On the masking pattern of simple auditory stimulus. J Acoust Soc Am, 22, 622–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J.J., Odenthal D.W., Schmidt P.H., Spoor A. 1974. Electrocochleography. Basic principles and clinical applications. Act Otolaryngol, Suppl. 316, 1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Eggermont J.J. 1977. Compound action potential tuning curves in normal and pathological human ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 62, 1247–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans E.F. 1972. The frequency response and other properties of single fibers in the guinea pig cochlear nerve. J Physiol, 226, 263–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans E.F. 1975. Cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus. W.D. Keidel and W.D. Neff Handbook of Sensory Physiology: Vol. V. Auditory System, Berlin: Springer, 2–108.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H. 1940. Auditory patterns. Rev Mod Phys, 12, 47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florentine M., Houtsma A.J.M. 1983. Tuning curves and pitch matching in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 73, 961–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. 1986. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 1020–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., McGee T., Walsh E.J., Javel E., Farley J.R. 1983. ABR measurements in the cat using a forward-masking paradigm. J Acoust Soc Am, 73, 256–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris D.M. 1979. Action potential suppression, tuning curves, and thresholds: Comparison with single-fiber data. Hear Res, 1, 133–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison R.V. 1981. Rate-versus-intensity functions and related AP responses in normal and pathological guinea pig and human cochleas. J Acoust Soc Am, 70, 1036–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison R.V., Aran J.M., Erre J.P. 1981. AP tuning curves from normal and pathological human and guinea pig cochleas. J Acoust Soc Am, 69, 1374–1385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison R.V. 1984. Objective measures of cochlear frequency selectivity in animals and in man. A review. Acta Neurol Belg, 84, 213–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey S.J., Mount R., Sado Y., Naito I., Ninomiya Y. . 2001. The inner ear of dogs with X-linked nephritis provides clues to the pathogenesis of hearing loss in X-linked Alport syndrome. Am J Path, 159, 1097–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellstrom L.I., Schmiedt R.A. 1996. Measures of tuning and suppression in single-fiber and whole-nerve responses in young and quiet-aged gerbils. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 3275–3285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Lins O., Van Roon P., Stapells D.R., Scherg M. . 2002. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Br Topogr, 15, 69–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepsen M.L., Ewert S.D., Dau T. 2008. A computational model of human auditory signal processing and perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 124, 422–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna S.M., Teich M.C. 1989. Spectral characteristics of the responses of primary auditory-nerve fibers to amplitude-modulated signals. Hear Res, 9, 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Kiang N.Y., Sachs M.B., Peake W.T. 1967. Shapes of tuning curves for single auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am, 42, 1341–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein A.J., Mills J.H. 1981. Physiological (waves I and V) and psychophysical tuning curves in human subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 69, 760–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein A.J. 1986. Properties of the brain-stem response slow-wave component. II. Frequency specificity. Arch Otolaryngol, 109, 74–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kluk K., Moore B.C.J. 2004. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally-hearing subjects. Hear Res, 194, 118–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K., Moore B.C.J. 2005. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions. Hear Res, 200, 115–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwada S., Batra R., Maher V.L. 1986. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res, 21, 179–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi E.C., Folsom R.C., Dobie R.A. 1993. Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): Effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state. Hear Res, 68, 42–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton P.E., Picton T.W. 1995. Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80-110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 3051–3063.
   Google Scholar
• Markessis E., Poncelet L., Colin C., Coppens A., Hoonhorst I. . 2009. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady-state evoked potentials: A proof-of-concept study. Ear Hear, 30, 43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell C., Fowler C. 1980. Tuning curves of cochlear and brainstem responses in the guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Am, 68, 896–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 1978. Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am , 63, 524–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 1995. Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 1998. Cochlear Hearing Loss. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Alcántara J.I., Dau T. 1998. Masking patterns for sinusoidal and narrowband noise maskers. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 1023–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R., Alcántara J.I. 2000. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Brit J Audiol, 34, 205–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2004. Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear, 25, 98–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niparko J.K., Pfingst B.E., Johansson C., Kileny P.R., Kemink J.L.. 1993. Cochlear wall titanium implants for auditory nerve stimulation. Ann Otolaryngol Rhino Laryngol, 102, 447–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick G.F., Evans E.F., Wilson J.P. 1977. Frequency resolution in patients with hearing loss of cochlear origin. E.F. Evans, J.P. Wilson. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing. London: Academic Press, 273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Skinner C.R., Champagne S.C., Kellett A.J., Maiste A.C. 1987. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am, 82, 165–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F.W., Cohen L.T., De Vidi S., Clark G.M. 1995. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear, 16, 499–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggero M.A., Temchin A.N. 2005. Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 102, 18614–18619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz M. 1980. Information Transmission, Modulation and Noise. New York, McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers M.L., Humes L.E. 1993. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise masked normal, and elderly listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 1449–1450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel K.P., Bock G.R. 1993. Hereditary inner ear abnormalities in animals. Relationships with human abnormalities. Arch Otolaryngol, 109, 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Strain G.M. 1996. Aetiology, prevalence and diagnosis of deafness in dogs and cats. British Veterinary Journal, 152, 17–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strain G.M. 2004. Deafness prevalence and pigmentation and gender associations in dog breeds at risk. The Veterinary Journal, 167, 23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supin A.Y., Popov V.V., Klishin V.O. 1993. ABR frequency tuning curves in dolphins. J Comp Physiol, 173, 649–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasaki I. 1954. Nerve impulses in individual auditory nerve fibers of guinea pig. J Neurophysiol, 17, 97–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A.R., Abbas P.J. 1980. Low-frequency hearing loss: Perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 67, 638–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogten L.L.M. 1974. Pure-tone masking: A new result from a new method. E. Zwicker, E Terhardt. Facts and Models in Hearing, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 142–155.
   Google Scholar
• Vogten L.L.M. 1978. Simultaneous pure-tone masking: The dependence of masking asymmetries on intensity. J Acoust Soc Am, 63, 1509–1519.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogten L.L.M. 1978. Low-level pure-tone masking: A comparison of ‘tuning curves’ obtained with simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 63, 1520–1527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E., Jaroszewski A. 1982. Inverse frequency dependence of simultaneous tone-on-tone masking patterns at low levels. J Acoust Soc Am, 71, 1508–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E., Schorn, K. 1978. Psychoacoustical tuning curves in audiology. Audiol, 17, 120–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• E. Zwicker, E Terhardt. Facts and Models in Hearing. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 142–155.
   Google Scholar