192
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Effects of reverberation on acceptable noise level measurements in younger and older adults

, , &
Pages 832-838 | Received 24 Mar 2009, Accepted 02 May 2010, Published online: 12 Oct 2010

References

  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 1970. Acoustical Terminology (ANSI-S1.1-1970). New York: American National Standards Institute.
  • American National Standards Institute. 1991. Maximum Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms (ANSI-S3.1-1991). New York: American National Standards Institute.
  • American National Standards Institute. 1996. American National Standards Specification for Audiometers (ANSI-S3.6-1996). New York: American National Standards Institute.
  • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). 2005. Guidelines for Audiologic Manual Pure-tone Threshold Audiometry. ASHA.
  • Bilger B.C., Nuetzel J.M., Rabinowitz W.M., Rzeczkowski C. 1984. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Hear Res, 27, 32–48.
  • Bolt R.H., MacDonald A.D. 1949. Theory of speech masking by reverberation. J Acoust Soc Am, 21 (6), 577–80.
  • Bradley J.S., Sato H., Picard M. 2003. On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms. J Acoust Soc Am, 113 (6), 3233–44.
  • Crandell C.C., Smaldino J.J. 2000. Classroom acoustics for children with normal hearing and with hearing impairment. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, 31, 362–70.
  • Crowley H.F., Nabelek I.V. 1996. Estimation of client assessed hearing aid performance based upon unaided variables. J Speech Hear Res, 39, 19–27.
  • Duquesnoy A.J., Plomp R. 1980. Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis. J Acoust Soc Am, 68 (2), 537–44.
  • Finitzo-Hieber T., Tillman T.W. 1978. Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res, 21, 440–58.
  • Franklin C.A., Thelin J.W., Nabelek A.K., Burchfield S.B. 2006. The effect of speech presentation level on acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 17 (2), 141–46.
  • Freyaldenhoven M.C., Thelin J.W., Plyler P.N., Nabelek A.K., Burchfield S.B. 2005. Effect of stimulant medication on the acceptance of background noise in individuals with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Audiol, 16 (9), 677–86.
  • Gelfand S.A., Hochberg I. 1976. Binaural and monaural speech discrimination under reverberation. Audiology, 15, 72–84.
  • Gelfand S.A., Silman S. 1979. Effects of small room reverberation upon the reception of some consonant features. J Acoust Soc Am, 66 (1), 22–9.
  • Gordon-Hickey S. 2007. Effect of different stimulus conditions on acceptable noise levels for young adults with normal hearing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of South Alabama, University Microfilms, Mobile, USA.
  • Gordon-Hickey S., Moore R.E. 2007. Influence of music and music preference on acceptable noise levels in listeners with normal hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 18 (5), 417–27.
  • Gordon-Hickey S., Moore R.E. 2008. Acceptance of noise with intelligible, reversed, and unfamiliar primary discourse. Am J Audiol, 17, 129–35.
  • Gordon-Salant S., Fitzgibbons P.J. 1995. Recognition of multiply degraded speech by young and elderly listeners. J Speech Hear Res, 38, 1150–56.
  • Harkrider A.W., Smith S.B. 2005. Acceptable noise level, phoneme recognition in noise, and measures of auditory efferent activity. J Am Acad Audiol, 16 (8), 530–45.
  • Harkrider A.W., Tampas J.W. 2006. Differences in responses from the cochleae and central nervous systems of females with low versus high acceptable noise levels. J Am Acad Audiol, 17 (9), 667–76.
  • Harris R.W., Reitz M.L. 1985. Effects of room reverberation and noise on speech discrimination by the elderly. Audiology, 24, 319–24.
  • Helfer K. 1992. Aging and the binaural advantage in reverberation and noise. J Speech Hear Res, 35, 1394–1401.
  • Helfer K. 1994. Binaural cues and consonant perception in reverberation and noise. J Speech Hear Res, 37, 429–38.
  • Helfer K., Wilber L.A. 1990. Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. J Speech Hear Res, 33, 149–55.
  • Houtgast T., Steeneken H.J.M. 1973. The modulation transfer function in room acoustics as a predictor of speech intelligibility. Acoustica, 28, 66–73.
  • Kreul E.J., Nixon N.C., Kryter K.C., Bell D.W., Land J.S. 1968. A proposed clinical test of speech discrimination. J Speech Hear Res, 11, 536–52.
  • Lochner J., Burger J. 1964. The influence of reflections in auditorium acoustics. J Sound & Vibration, 4, 426–454.
  • Nabelek A.K., Freyaldenhoven M.C., Tampas J., Burchfield S.B., Muenchen R.A. 2006. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use. J Am Acad Audiol, 17 (9), 626–39.
  • Nabelek A.K., Letowski T.R., Tucker F.M. 1989. Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification. J Acoust Soc Am, 86 (4), 1259–65.
  • Nabelek A.K., Mason D. 1981. Effects of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms. J Speech Hear Res, 24, 375–83.
  • Nabelek A.K., Pickett J.M. 1974. Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation, and hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 56 (2), 628–39.
  • Nabelek A.K., Robinette L. 1978. Reverberation as a parameter in clinical testing. Audiology, 17, 239–59.
  • Nabelek A.K., Tampas J.W., Burchfield S.B. 2004. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 47, 1001–11.
  • Nabelek A.K., Tucker F.M., Letowski T.R. 1991. Toleration of background noises: Relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res, 34, 679–85.
  • Rogers D.S., Harkrider A.W., Burchfield S.B., Nabelek A.K. 2003. The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise. J Am Acad Aud, 14 (7), 372–82.
  • Sato H., Morimoto M., Ota R. 2007. Acceptable range of speech level for both young and aged listeners in reverberant and quiet sound fields. J Acoust Soc Am, 122 (3), 1616–23.
  • Tampas J. W., Harkrider A.W. 2006. Auditory evoked potentials in females with high and low acceptance of background noise when listening to speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 119 (3), 1548–61.
  • von Hapsburg D., Bahng J. 2006. Acceptance of background noise levels in bilingual (Korean-English) listeners. J Am Acad Aud, 17, 649–58.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.