Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods

References

• Agus T., Akeroyd M.A., Noble W., Bhullar N. 2009. An analysis of the masking of speech by competing speech using self-report data (L). J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 23–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bargh J.A., Chen M., Burrows L. 1996. The automaticity of social behaviour: Direct effects of trait concept and stereotype activation on action. J Pers Soc Psychol, 71, 230–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasteen A.L., Bhattacharyya S., Horhota M., Tam R., Hasher L. 2005. How feelings of stereotype threat affect older adults’ memory performance. Exp Aging Res, 31, 235–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw E.D. 1992. Data Quality in Mail, Telephone, and Face-to-face Surveys. Amsterdam: TT Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Demorest M., Erdman S.A. 1987. Development of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Disord, 52, 129–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demorest M., Walden B. 1984. Psychometric principles in the selection, interpretation and evaluation of communication self-assessment inventories. J Speech Hear Disord, 49, 226–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijksterhuis A., Bargh J.A. 2001. The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. M.P. Zanna, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 33, San Diego: Academic Press, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Dubno J.R., Dirks D.D., Morgan D.E. 1984. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech reception in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 87–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumper J., Hodgetts B., Liu R., Brandner N. 2009. Implications for bone-anchored hearing aids: A functional study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 38, 96–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duquesnoy A.J. 1983. Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source up on the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 739–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S., Noble W. 2004. The Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham A., Goss C., Xu S., Magid D.J., DiGuiseppi C. 2007. Effect of using different modes to administer the AUDIT-C on identification of hazardous drinking and acquiescence to trial participation among injured patients. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 42, 423–429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall M.F. 1995. Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results. J Health Care Mark, 15, 54–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hess T.M., Hinson J.T., Hodges E.A. 2009. Moderators of and mechanisms underlying stereotype threat effects on older adults’ memory performance. Experimental Aging Research, 35, 153–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell D.C. 2006. Statistical Methods for Psychology. (6th) Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury/Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hétu R. 1996. The stigma attached to hearing impairment. Scand Audiol, 25(Suppl 43), 12–24.
   Google Scholar
• House J.W., Kutz J.W. Jr., Chung J., Fisher L.M. 2010. Bone-anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness. Laryngoscope, 120, 601–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L.E. 2002. Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 1112–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummert M.L., Garstka T.A., Shaner J.L., Strahm S. 1994. Stereotypes of the elderly held by young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. J Gerontol B-Psychol, 49, 240–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac S., Michael W.B. 1971. Handbook in Research and Evaluation, San Diego: Edits.
   Google Scholar
• Kite M.E., Stockdale G.D., Whitley B.E. Jr., Johnson B.T. 2005. Attitudes toward younger and older adults: An updated meta-analytic review. J Soc Issues, 61, 241–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong See S.T., Ryan E.B. 1999. Intergenerational communication: The survey interview as a social exchange. N. Schwarz, D. Park, B. Knäuper, S. Sudman, Cognition, Aging, and Self-reports, Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, 245–62.
   Google Scholar
• Levy B.R., Langer E.J. 1994. Aging free from negative stereotypes: Successful memory among the American deaf and in China. J Per Soc Psychol, 66, 935–943.
   Google Scholar
• Levy B.R., Slade M.D., Gill T. 2006. Hearing decline predicted by elders’ age stereotypes. J Gerontol B-Psychol, 61, 82–87.
   Google Scholar
• MRC Institute of Hearing Research. 2009. The Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale. Retrieved September 18, 2009, from the MRC Institute of Hearing Research website (http://www.ihr.mrc.ac.uk/products/index.php?page=questionnaire_downloads).
   Google Scholar
• Murphy K.R., Davidshofer C.O. 2005. Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications, 6th. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Noble W.G. 1979. The Hearing Measurement Scale as a paper-and-pencil form: Preliminary results. Journal of the American Auditory Society, 5, 95–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noble W., Gatehouse S. 2004. Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap. Int J Audiol, 43, 100–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W., Gatehouse S. 2006. Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fittings on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 45, 172–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W., Tyler R., Dunn C., Bhullar N. 2008. Unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants and the implant-plus-hearing-aid profile: Comparing self-assessed and measured abilities. Int J Audiol, 47, 505–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble W., Tyler R.S., Dunn C.C., Bhullar N. 2009. Younger- and older-age adults with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants: Speech and spatial hearing self-ratings and performance. Otol Neurotol, 30, 921–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally J.C. 1978. Psychometric Theory (2nd). New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K., Singh G. 2006. Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing aid fitting and audiological rehabilitation. Trends in Amplif, 10, 29–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K., Souza P. 2003. Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech. Int J Audiol, 42, 11–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. 1978. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 63, 533–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman W.L., Kiesler S., Weisband S., Drasgow F. 1999. A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. J Appl Psychol, 84, 754–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schum D.J., Mathews L.J., Lee F. 1991. Actual and predicted word-recognition performance of elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 636–642.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steele C.M., Aronson J. 1995. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J Pers Soc Psychol, 69, 797–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele C.M., Spencer S., Aronson J. 2002. Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. M. Zanna, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 37. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein B.E., Spitzer J.B., Ventry I.M. 1986. Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for the elderly. Ear Hear, 5, 295–299.
   Google Scholar