Perception of temporal fine-structure cues in speech with minimal envelope cues for listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss

References

• Bacon S.P., Viemeister N.F. 1985. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology, 24, 117–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskent D. 2006. Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 2908–2925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss E., Hall J.W. 3rd, Grose J.H. 2004. Temporal fine-structure cues to speech and pure tone modulation in observers with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear, 25, 242–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cheveigne A., Kawahara H. 2002. YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 1917–1930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng L., Geisler C.D. 1987. Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to nasal consonant-vowel syllables. J Acoust Soc Am, 82, 1977–1988.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drullman R. 1995. Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 585–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno J.R., Dirks D.D. 1989. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 85, 1666–1675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullgrabe C., Meyer B., Lorenzi C. 2003. Effect of cochlear damage on the detection of complex temporal envelopes. Hear Res, 178, 35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert G., Lorenzi C. 2006. The ability of listeners to use recovered envelope cues from speech fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 2438–2444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C. 1986. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 1020–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz M.G., Swaminathan J. 2009. Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopkins K., Moore B.C. 2007. Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 1055–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins K., Moore B.C. 2009. The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 442–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins K., Moore B.C., Stone M.A. 2008. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 1140–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 60318-1 2009 Electroacoustics – Simulators of human head and ear – Part 1: Ear simulator for the measurement of supra-aural and circumaural earphones. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Lacher-Fougere S., Demany L. 2005. Consequences of cochlear damage for the detection of interaural phase differences. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 2519–2526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Debruille L., Garnier S., Fleuriot P., Moore B.C. 2009. Abnormal processing of temporal fine structure in speech for frequencies where absolute thresholds are normal. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 27–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Gilbert G., Carn H., Garnier S., Moore B.C. 2006. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103, 18866–18869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Moore B.C. 2008. Role of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in speech perception: A review. T. Dau, J.M. Buchholz, J.M. Harte, T.U. Christiansen. Auditory Signal Processing in Hearing-impaired Listeners, 1st International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research (ISAAR 2007). Denmark: Centertryk A/S, 263–72.
   Google Scholar
• Miller G.A., Nicely P.E. 1955. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am, 27, 338–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.. 2007. Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological, and Technical Issues. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C. 2008a. The choice of compression speed in hearing AIDS: Theoretical and practical considerations and the role of individual differences. Trends Amplif, 12, 103–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2008b. The role of temporal fine structure in normal and impaired hearing. T. Dau, J.M. Buchholz, J.M. Harte, T.U. Christiansen. Auditory Signal Processing in Hearing-impaired Listeners, 1st International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research (ISAAR 2007). Denmark: Centertryk A/S, 249–272.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Glasberg B.R. 1998. Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids. Br J Audiol, 32, 317–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Glasberg B.R. 2001. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 1067–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Glasberg B.R., Hopkins K. 2006. Frequency discrimination of complex tones by hearing-impaired subjects: Evidence for loss of ability to use temporal fine structure. Hear Res, 222, 16–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Moore G.A. 2003. Discrimination of the fundamental frequency of complex tones with fixed and shifting spectral envelopes by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Hear Res, 182, 153–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C., Sek A. 2009. Development of a fast method for determining sensitivity to temporal fine structure. Int J Audiol, 48, 161–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C., Skrodzka E. 2002. Detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: Effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and added amplitude modulation. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 327–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patterson R.D., Nimmo-Smith I., Holdsworth J., Rice P. 1987. An effecient auditory filterbank based on the gammatone function. Meeting of the IOC Speech Group on Auditory Modeling at RSRE. Malvern, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Peters R.W., Moore B.C. 1992. Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies in young and elderly hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 256–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen S. 1992. Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 336, 367–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santurette S., Dau T. 2007. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Hear Res, 223, 29–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. 1995. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheft S., Ardoint M., Lorenzi C. 2008. Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues. J Acoust Soc Am, 124, 562–575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith Z.M., Delgutte B., Oxenham A.J. 2002. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416, 87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza P.E., Boike K.T. 2006. Combining temporal-envelope cues across channels: Effects of age and hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 49, 138–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone M.A., Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C. 1992. Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method. Br J Audiol, 26, 329–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C. 2008. Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multichannel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 1063–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelcyk O., Dau T. 2009. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 3328–3345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers V., Cord M.T. 2007. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: Effects of hearing loss and frequency region. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 1130–1137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner C.W., Souza P.E., Forget L.N. 1995. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 2568–2576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R.S., Hall J.W., Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C., Patterson R.D. 1984. Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired. J Acoust Soc Am, 76, 1363–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G., Nie K., Liu S., Stickney G., Del Rio E. . 2004. On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 1351–1354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeng F.G., Nie K., Stickney G.S., Kong Y.Y., Vongphoe M. . 2005. Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102, 2293–2298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar