Preliminary evaluation of a method for fitting hearing aids with extended bandwidth

References

• ANSI 1997. ANSI S3.5-1997, Methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index. New York: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI 2007. ANSI S3.4-2007. Procedure for the computation of loudness of steady sounds. New York: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Baer T., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K. 2002. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 1133–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C.I., Wexler K.F., Jerger J.F., Halperin H.R., Smith S. 1978. Superior ultra-audiometric hearing: A new type of hearing loss which correlates highly with unusually good speech in the ‘profoundly deaf’. Otolaryngology, 86, 111–116.
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology 2004. Pure-tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking and determination of uncomfortable loudness levels. Reading, UK: British Society of Audiology.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhard M.D., Sachs R.M. 1975. Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research. J Acoust Soc Am, 58, 214–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Ching T., Katsch R., Keidser G. 2001. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching T., Dillon H., Byrne D. 1998. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 1128–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks J.R. 1982. Judgments of hearing aid processed music. Ear Hear, 3, 18–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse S. 1992. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: Evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 92, 1258–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. 1986. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 1020–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. 1990. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res, 47, 103–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamacher V. 2006. Perzeptive Evaluierung von Methoden zur Sprachverbesserung in modernen digitalen Hörgeräten (Perceptual evaluation of methods for improving speech intelligibility in modern digital hearing aids). Sprachkommunikation 2006 (ITG-FB 192), Kiel, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan C.A., Turner C.W. 1998. High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 432–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kates J.M. 2008. Digital Hearing Aids. San Diego: Plural.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser G., Dillon H., Byrne D. 1995. Candidates for multiple frequency response characteristics. Ear Hear, 16, 562–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion M.C., Tillman T.W. 1982. Evaluation of high-fidelity hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res, 25, 15–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. 2005. Detection Theory: A User's Guide, 2nd New York: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2000. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore ‘normal’ loudness for speech at different levels. Br J Audiol, 34, 165–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2003. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 5th San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2004. Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis and clinical applications. Ear Hear, 25, 98–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2005. The use of a loudness model to derive initial fittings for hearing aids: validation studies. T. Anderson, C.B. Larsen, T. Poulsen, A.N. Rasmussen, J.B. Simonsen Hearing Aid Fitting, Denmark: Holmens Trykkeri, 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2007. Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological and Technical Issues, 2nd Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2008. The choice of compression speed in hearing aids: Theoretical and practical considerations, and the role of individual differences. Trends Amplif, 12, 103–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Füllgrabe C. 2010. Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multi-channel amplitude compression. Ear Hear, (in press) doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e1cd0d.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Füllgrabe C., Stone M.A. 2010a. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. J Acoust Soc Am, (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. 1998. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids. Br J Audiol, 32, 317–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. 2004. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Hear Res, 188, 70–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. 1999. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. Br J Audiol, 33, 241–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. 2004. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear, 25, 478–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. 2010b. Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF. Int J Audiol, 49, 216–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Stone M.A., Füllgrabe C., Glasberg B.R., Puria S. 2008. Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear, 29, 907–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Tan C.T. 2003. Perceived naturalness of spectrally distorted speech and music. J Acoust Soc Am, 114, 408–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Wojtczak M., Vickers D.A. 1996. Effect of loudness recruitment on the perception of amplitude modulation. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 481–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray N., Byrne D. 1986. Performance of hearing-impaired and normal hearing listeners with various high-frequency cut-offs in hearing aids. Aust J Audiol, 8, 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts T.A., Dittberner A.B., Johnson E.E. 2008. High-frequency amplification and sound quality in listeners with normal through moderate hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 160–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson J., Baer T., Moore B.C.J. 2007. Using transposition to improve consonant discrimination and detection for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 46, 293–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie S., Seewald R., Cornelisse L., Moodie S., Bagatto M. 2005. The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends Amplif, 9, 159–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skinner M.W., Miller J.D. 1983. Amplification bandwidth and intelligibility of speech in quiet and noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology, 22, 253–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Lewis D.E., Choi S., Hoover B. 2007. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear, 28, 483–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Lewis D.E., Larson L.L., Jesteadt W. 1987. Growth of masking as a measure of response growth in hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 81, 1881–1887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Pittman A.L., Hoover B.M., Lewis D.E. 2001. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 2183–2190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G.A. 1985. A ‘rationalized’ arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res, 28, 455–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vickers D.A., Moore B.C.J., Baer T. 2001. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 1164–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers D.A., Robinson J., Füllgrabe C., Baer T., Moore B.C.J. 2009. Relative importance of different spectral bands to consonant identification: Relevance for frequency transposition in hearing aids. Int J Audiol, 48, 334–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar