Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition

References

• Armstrong M., Pegg P., James C., Blamey P. 1997. Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. Am J Otol, 18, S140–S141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balkany T., Hodges A., Menapace C., Hazard L., Driscoll C. . 2007. Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 136, 757–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassim M.K., Buss E., Clark M.S., Kolln K.A., Pillsbuy C.H. . 2005. MED-EL Combi40+ cochlear implantation in adults. Laryngoscope, 115, 1568–1573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown C., Bacon S. 2009. Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone. Ear Hear, 30(5), 489–493.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buss E., Pillsbury H.C., Buchman C.A., Pillsbury C.H., Clark M.S. . 2008. Multicenter U.S. bilateral MED-EL cochlear implantation study: peech perception over the first year of use. Ear Hear, 29, 20–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang J.E., Bai J.Y., Zeng F.G. 2006. Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 53, 2598–2601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y. 2005. The evidence calls for making binaural-bimodal fitting routine. Hear J, 58, 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y., Van Wanrooy E., Dillon H. 2007. Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: review. Trends Amplif, 11, 161–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Incerti P., Hill M. 2004. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear, 25, 9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton-Conley C.L., Neuman A.C., Killion M.C., Levitt H. 2004. Performance of directional microphones for hearing aids: Real-world versus simulation. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 440–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cutler A., Carter D.M. 1987. The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Comp Speech Lang, 2, 133–142.
   Google Scholar
• Dorman M., Gifford R., Spahr A., Mckarns S. 2008. The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice, and melodies. Audiol Neurootol, 13, 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman M.F., Gifford R., Lewis K., Mckarns S., Ratigan J. . 2009. Word recognition following implantation of conventional and 10-mm hybrid electrodes. Audiol Neurootol, 14, 181–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faulkner A., Rosen S. 1999. Contributions of temporal encodings of voicing, voicelessness, fundamental frequency, and amplitude variation to audio-visual and auditory speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 2063–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firszt J.B., Holden L.K., Skinner M.W., Tobey E.A., Peterson A. . 2004. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear Hear, 25, 375–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz B.J., Turner C. 2004. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol, 124, 344–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford R., Dorman M., Shallop J., Sydlowski S. 2010. Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear Hear, Jan 12 Epub ahead of print.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gifford R., Shallop J., Peterson A. 2008. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: Considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiol Neurootol, 13, 193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford R.H., Dorman M.F., Mckarns S.A., Spahr A.J. 2007. Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: Word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 50, 835–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstoettner W., Kiefer J., Baumgartner W.D., Pok S., Peters S. . 2004. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol, 124, 348–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzavi J., Pok S., Gstoettner W., Baumgartner W-D. 2004. Speech perception with a cochleaer implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear. Int J Audiol, 43, 61–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry A., Turner C., Behrens A. 2005. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: Norman hearing, hearing impaired and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 1111–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer J., Gstoettner W., Baumgartner W., Pok S.M., Tillein J. . 2004. Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol, 124, 272–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer J., Pok M., Adunka O., Sturzebecher E., Baumgartner W. . 2005. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: Results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol, 10, 134–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y., Carlyon R. 2007. Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 3717–3727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y.Y., Stickney G.S., Zeng F.G. 2005. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 1351–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral A., Hartmann R., Mortazavi D., Klinke R. 1998. Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: The electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents. Hear Res, 121, 11–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson D.T., Wilson B. Zerbi M., Finley C. 1999. Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses, 1999, 4th QPR; NIH N01DC-8-2105:1–27. Available at http://www.rti.org/capr/caprqprs.html
   Google Scholar
• Li N., Loizou P.C. 2008. The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 124, 3947.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liberman A.M. 1996. Speech: A Special Code, Cambridge, USA: The Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Litovsky R., Parkinson A., Arcaroli J., Sammeth C. 2006. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: A multicenter clinical study. Ear Hear, 27, 714–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlebrooks J.C., Bierer J.A. 2002. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: Coding of stimulus channel and current level. J Neurophysiol, 87, 493–507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mok M., Grayden D., Dowell R.C., Lawrence D. 2006. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 49, 338–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M., Soli S.D., Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A., Bacon S. 2004. Psychophysical manifestations of compression: Normal-hearing listeners. S.P. Bacon, R.R. Fay, and A.N. Popper .Compression from Cochlea to Cochlear Implants, New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson G.E., Lehiste I. 1962. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 27, 62–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plomp R., Mimpen A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts T.A., Grantham D.W., Ashmead D.H., Haynes D.S., Labadie R.F. 2006. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources. Ear Hear, 27, 763–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallop J., Arndt P., Turnacliff K. 1992. Expanded indications for cochlear implantation: Perceptual results in seven adults with residual hearing. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology & Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon R.V., Zeng F.G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. 1995. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder R.L., Middlebrooks J.C., Bonham B.H. 2008. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity. Hear Res, 235, 23–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spahr A.J., Dorman M.F., Loiselle L.H. 2007. Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: Effects of input dynamic range. Ear Hear, 28, 260–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer S., Liss J., Spahr T., Dorman M., Lansford K. 2009. The use of fundamental frequency for lexical segmentation in listeners with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, EL236–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens K.N. 2002. Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 1872–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C.W., Gantz B.J., Vidal C., Behrens A., Henry B.A. 2004. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 1729–1735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R.S., Parkinson A.J., Wilson B.S., Witt S., Preece J.P. . 2002. Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: Speech perception and localization. Ear Hear, 23, 98–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Ilberg C., Kiefer J., Tillein J., Pfenningdorff T., Hartmann R. 1999. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 61, 334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B., Dorman M. 2009. The design of cochlear implants. J.K. Niparko, Cochlear Implants, Principals and Practices. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 95–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wouters J., Damman W., Bosman A.J. 1994. Vlaamse opname van woordenlijsten voor spraakaudiometrie. Logopedie, 7, 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitler D.M., Kessler M.A., Terushkin V., Roland T.J. Jr., Svirsky M.A. . 2008. Speech perception benefits of sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children and adults: A retrospective analysis. Otol Neurotol, 29, 314–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T., Spahr A., Dorman M. 2010. Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation. Ear Hear, 31(1), 63–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zue V. 1985. The use of speech knowledge in speech recognition. Proc IEEE, 73, 1602–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar