Auditory evoked response to gaps in noise: Older adults

References

• Alain C., Schneider J. 2008. Age-related differences in auditory evoked responses during rapid perceptual learning. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 356–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsz K., Ison J., Snell K., Walton J. 2002. Behavioral and neural measures of auditory temporal acuity in aging humans and mice. Neurobiology of Aging, 23, 565–578.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ceponiene R., Westerfield M., Torki M., Townsend J. 2008. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research, 1215, 53–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen M. 1982. Coronal topography of the middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEPs) in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 53, 231–236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creasey H., Rapoport S. 1985. The aging human brain. Annals of Neurology, 17, 2–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dien J., Frishkoff G.A. 2005. Principal components analysis of event- related potential datasets. T. Handy, Event-related potentials: A methods handbook. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eddins D., Hall J., Grose J. 1992. The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth. J Acoustic Soc Am, 91, 1069–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbons P., Gordon-Salant S. 1987. Minimum stimulus levels for temporal gap resolution in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoustic Soc Am, 81, 1542–1545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbons P., Gordon-Salant S. 1995. Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli. J Acoustic Soc Am, 98, 3140–3145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgibbons P., Gordon-Salant S., Friedman S. 2006. Effects of age and sequence presentation rate on temporal order recognition. J Acoustic Soc Am, 120, 991–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein M., Folstein S.E., McHugh P.R. 1975. ‘Mini-mental state’: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res, 12(3), 189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehr S., Sommers M. 1999. Age differences in backward masking. J Acoustic Soc Am, 106, 2793–2799.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasberg B., Moore B., Bacon S. 1987. Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects. J Acoustic Soc Am, 81, 1546–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S., Fitzgibbons P. 1993. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 36, 1276–1285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse S.W., Geisser S. 1959. On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde M. 1997. The N1 response and its applications. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 2, 281–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Key A., Dove G., Maguire M. 2005. Linking brainwaves to the brain: An ERP primer. Dev Neuropsychol, 27, 183–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoustic Soc Am, 49, 467–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister J., Besing J., Koehnke J. 2002. Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap duration discrimination. J Acoustic Soc Am, 111, 2793–2800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister J., Maxfield N., Pitt G. 2007. Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: Within-channel and across-channel conditions. Ear Hear, 28, 862–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister J., Roberts R. 2005. Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: Narrow-band stimuli. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 48, 482–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister J., Tarver K. 2004. Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 47, 257–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merzenich M., Jenkins W., Johnston P., Schreiner C., Miller S. 1996. Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science, 271, 77–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naatanen R., Picton T. 1987. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 24, 375–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostroff J., Martin B., Boothroyd A. 1998. Cortical evoked responses to acoustic change within a syllable. Ear Hear, 19, 290–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A. 2000. Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection. J Acoustic Soc Am, 107, 2215–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D., Taylor T., Hall S., Carr M., Mossop J. 1997. Detection of silent intervals between noises activating different perceptual channels: Some properties of central auditory gap detection. J Acoustic Soc Am, 101, 3694–3705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. 1964. Rate of decay of auditory sensation. J Acoustic Soc Am, 36, 277–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider B., Hamstra S. 1999. Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners. J Acoustic Soc Am, 106, 371–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonnquist-Uhlen I., Ponton C., Eggermont J., Kwong B., Don M. 2003. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: The T-complex. Clin Neurophysiol, 114, 685–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay K., Billings C., Rohila N. 2004. Speech evoked cortical potentials: Effects of age and stimulus presentation rate. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 226–237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tremblay K., Friesen L., Martin B., Wright R. 2003. Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear Hear, 24, 225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay K., Kraus N., McGee T., Ponton C., Otis B. 2001. Central auditory plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear Hear, 22(2), 79–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Ingelghem M., van Wieringen A., Wouters J., Vandenbussche E., Onghena P. . 2001. Psychophysical evidence for a general temporal processing deficit in children with dyslexia. NeuroReport, 12, 3603–3607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walhovd K., Fjell A. 2002. One-year test-retest reliability of auditory ERPs in young and old adults. Int J Psychophysiol, 46, 29–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton J., Barsz K., Wilson W. 2008. Sensorineural hearing loss and neural correlates of temporal acuity in the inferior colliculus of the C57bl/6 mouse. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 9, 90–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton J., Frisina R., Ison J., O'Neill W. 1997. Neural correlates of behavioral gap detection in the inferior colliculus of the young CBA mouse. J Comp Physiol, 181, 161–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton J., Frisina R., O'Neill W. 1998. Age-related alteration in processing of temporal sound features in the auditory midbrain of the CBA mouse. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2764–2776.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• West R. 1996. An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 272–292.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolpaw J., Penry J. 1975. A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 609–620.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeng F., Oba S., Garde S., Sininger Y., Starr A. 1999. Temporal and speech processing deficits in auditory neuropathy. NeuroReport, 10, 3429–3435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar