The effect of varying stimulus phase between frequency and amplitude modulation on auditory steady-state responses in neonates

References

• Brennan S.K., Brooke R.E., Stevens J.C. & Brown B.H. 2010. Effect of varying phase between frequency and amplitude modulation on bone conduction auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 31, 815–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatfield C. (ed.). 1970. Statistics for Technology. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen L.T., Rickards F.W. & Clark G.M. 1991. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 90, 2467–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B., Dowell R.C., Tomlin D., Rance G. & Ming W.J. 2002a. The auditory steady-state response: Comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 173–87, 225–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cone-Wesson B., Rickards F., Poulis C., Parker J., Tan L. . 2002b. The auditory steady-state response: Clinical observations and applications in infants and children. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 270–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Boer. 1980. Auditory physics. Physical principles in hearing theory I. Phys Rep, 62, 87–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., John M.S., Van Roon P., Purcell D.W., Adamonis J. . 2002. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 205–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dau T., Wegner O., Mellert V. & Kollmeier B. 2000 Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion. J Acoust Soc Am, 107(3), 1530–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J.J. & Salamy A. 1988. Maturational time course for the ABR in preterm and full term infants. Hear Res, 33, 35–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J.J., Ponton C.W, Coupland S.G. & Winkelaar R. 1991. Maturation of the traveling-wave delay in the human cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 90(1), 288–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont J.J., Brown D.K., Ponton C.W. & Kimberley B.P. 1996. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and auditory brain stem response (ABR) traveling wave delay measurements suggests frequency-specific synapse maturation. Ear Hear, 17(5), 386–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher N.I. 1993. Statistical Analysis of Circular Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folsom R.C. & Wynne M.K. 1987. Auditory brainstem responses from human adults and infants: Wave V tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am, 81(2), 412–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatton J. & Stapells D.R. 2011. The efficiency of the single- versus multiple-stimulus auditory steady state responses in infants. Ear Hear, 32(3), 349–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T. & Stapells D.K. 2003. Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol, 42, 237–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Picton T.W. & Stapells D.R. 2002. Place specificity of multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 1569–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S. & Picton T.W. 2000a. MASTER: A Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 61, 125–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S. & Picton T.W. 2000b. Human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones: Phase and latency measurements. Hear Res, 141, 57–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A. & Picton T.W. 2002a. Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear Hear, 23, 106–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A. & Picton T.W. 2003. Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 24, 406–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Lins O.G., Boucher B.L. & Picton T.W. 1998. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology, 37, 59–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., van Roon P. & Picton T.W. 2001. Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiol Neurootol, 6, 12–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Purcell D.W., Dimitrijevic A. & Picton T.W. 2002b. Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 246–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M.S., Brown D.K., Muir P.J. & Picton T.W. 2004. Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants. Ear Hear, 25, 539–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton P.E., Picton T.W., Champagne S.C. & Durieux-mith A. 1995. Auditory steady-state responses to tones amplitude-modulated at 80–110 Hz. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 3051–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W., Boucher B.L., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S.C. . 1996. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear, 17, 81–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Dimitrijevic A. & John M.S. 2002. Multiple auditory steady-state responses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 189, 16–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T.W., van Roon P. & John M.S. 2009. Multiple auditory steady state responses (80–101 Hz): Effects of ear, gender, handedness, intensity, and modulation rate. Ear Hear, 30, 100–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S., Purcell D.W. & Plourde G. 2003a. Human auditory steady-state responses: The effects of recording technique and state of arousal. Anesth Analg, 97, 1396–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A. & Purcell D. 2003b. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42, 177–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickards F.W., Tan L.E., Cohen L.T., Wilson O.J., Drew J.H. . 1994. Auditory steady-state evoked potential in newborns. Br J Audiol, 28, 327–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savio G., Cardenas J., Perez Abalo M., Gonzalez A. & Valdes J. 2001. The low and high frequency auditory steady-state responses mature at different rates. Audiol Neurootol, 6, 279–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spetner N.B. & Olsho L.W. 1990. Auditory frequency resolution in human infancy. Child Dev, 61(3), 632–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens J. 2001. State of the art neonatal hearing screening with auditory brainstem response. Scand Audiol Suppl, 10–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshinaga-Itano C., Sedey A.L., Coulter D.K. & Mehl A.L. 1998. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics, 102, 1161–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar